في دنيبرو ، تم احتجاز محققين خاصين للتنصت على الهواتف

[НСК-СБ]

In the Dnieper detained private detectives for wiretapping phones

Alena LITVINOVA (yesterday, 2:00 p.m.)

Spying on one person cost 3 thousand dollars

In the Dnieper, private detectives illegally monitored individuals and legal entities using special “spy” equipment. In the hands of the attackers fell records of conversations, correspondence in messengers, bank and personal data of the victims. About it reported in the press service of the SBU.

Security officers conducted searches in the offices and at the place of residence of private detectives, where they found information carriers on which personal data of some Dnepr residents were stored.

- For espionage, private detectives installed special software on the phones of the victims, which made it possible to wiretap and record telephone conversations, read messages in instant messengers, find out personal information and bank secrets. Detectives estimated the tracking of each person at 3 thousand dollars, the SBU reported.

As part of the criminal proceedings under Article 359 (illegal use of special technical means of tacitly obtaining information), security officials are looking for bank employees and law enforcement officers who have sold this information to the detective company, as well as surveillance customers. The suspects were handed notifications of suspicion, the issue of choosing him a preventive measure is being decided.

Private detectives outlawed

In Ukraine, private detectives are not officially recognized. People’s deputies tried several times to remove detectives from the shadows. In 2018, the Rada voted for the relevant law, but then-President Petro Poroshenko vetoed it. According to lawyers, this bills had two significant drawbacks.

Firstly, it did not provide for the right of detectives to operatively-search activities and the secret collection of information. So, if the client of a private detective doubts the transparency of the investigation by state law enforcement officers and hired a private detective, then the materials that the detective collected are right for the court not to consider.

Secondly, you can record audio, take photos and record videos only with the permission of the person being monitored. Roughly speaking, if a jealous husband decided to check his wife for fidelity, then by law, a private detective must take her written permission. Therefore, most private detectives continue to operate outside the law.

The last time the bill on the recognition of private detectives was filed by deputies from the Servant of the People in 2019, but it was also rejected.
In the Dnieper detained private detectives for wiretapping phones

 

[Детектив-Молдова]

Firstly, it did not provide for the right of detectives to operatively-search activities and the secret collection of information. So, if the client of a private detective doubts the transparency of the investigation by state law enforcement officers and hired a private detective, then the materials that the detective collected are right for the court not to consider.

Secondly, you can record audio, take photos and record videos only with the permission of the person being monitored. Roughly speaking, if a jealous husband decided to check his wife for fidelity, then by law, a private detective must take her written permission. Therefore, most private detectives continue to operate outside the law.

Colleagues, these restrictions are in all the laws on NPVs, where they exist. The existence of the NPV Law is not a guarantee that private detectives will not violate the Law.
The law on NPV is adopted in order to clearly attribute what cannot be done and what will have to be answered! And for the most part (99%), the existence of the NPV Law does not give any rights to a private detective.
As with him, and without him, we still can’t do anything except take an explanation with the consent of the person and take photos of the vacant lots, so as not to violate the right of ownership ...

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Colleagues, these restrictions are in all the laws on NPVs, where they exist. The existence of the NPV Law is not a guarantee that private detectives will not violate the Law.
The law on NPV is adopted in order to clearly attribute what cannot be done and what will have to be answered! And for the most part (99%), the existence of the NPV Law does not give any rights to a private detective.
As with him, and without him, we still can’t do anything except take an explanation with the consent of the person and take photos of the vacant lots, so as not to violate the right of ownership ...

Nikolay Vasilyevich, categorically agree !!!

 

[НСК-СБ]

Nikolay Vasilyevich, categorically agree !!!

 

[Арсен]

Colleagues, these restrictions are in all the laws on NPVs, where they exist. The existence of the NPV Law is not a guarantee that private detectives will not violate the Law.
The law on NPV is adopted in order to clearly attribute what cannot be done and what will have to be answered! And for the most part (99%), the existence of the NPV Law does not give any rights to a private detective.
As with him, and without him, we still can’t do anything except take an explanation with the consent of the person and take photos of the vacant lots, so as not to violate the right of ownership ...

I fully support, Nikolai Vasilievich!

 

[Детектив-Молдова]

Nikolay Vasilyevich, categorically agree !!!

Andrei Nikolayevich, Russia is probably the country in which there is a real possibility that the Parliament, in your case, in the State Duma will revise the NPV Law and supplement it with the necessary articles for the normal activities of private detectives, or it was adopted in a new edition . I came to this opinion, since I see in Russia real mechanisms that work in this direction. One of them is our MOD! In other countries, there are no prospects. And if so, let our colleagues prove it!
Colleagues, you can take this as a provocation to a discussion on this topic.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Andrei Nikolayevich, Russia is probably the country in which there is a real possibility that the Parliament, in your case, in the State Duma will revise the NPV Law and supplement it with the necessary articles for the normal activities of private detectives, or it was adopted in a new edition . I came to this opinion, since I see in Russia real mechanisms that work in this direction. One of them is our MOD! In other countries, there are no prospects. And if so, let our colleagues prove it!
Colleagues, you can take this as a provocation to a discussion on this topic.

Wait and see!
Thank!