Entrepreneurs will protect Russians from terrorists

[Марат]

In October, the law on anti-terrorist protection of facilities will enter into force. According to him, in crowded places of more than fifty people, the threat of terrorism should be fought by entrepreneurs who conduct business there - individuals and legal entities. They are charged with the obligation to identify, prevent, suppress, disclose and investigate terrorist acts.

Public places that fall under this law include concert venues, stadiums, clubs, cafes, restaurants, shops, etc. The implementation of new anti-terrorism security requirements will become quite costly for air transport. Indeed, according to the by-laws that are being prepared for the document, it is necessary to ensure constant online video surveillance at crowded sites. Carrying the Internet to the airborne and video broadcasting of the flight are expensive exercises. Equipping everything you need with just one aircraft, according to the most conservative estimates, will cost the owner about three hundred thousand dollars.

For non-compliance with the requirements of the law provides material and criminal liability. The Ministry of Internal Affairs has already prepared amendments to the Criminal Code and the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. According to them, a violation of the letter of the law for citizens will cost from 3,000 to 5,000 rubles, for officials from 30,000 to 50,000, for legal entities from 50,000 to 100,000.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Thank you Marat)))) In principle, these are changes to FZ-35 ... The new law that introduced these changes is No. 208 of July 23, 2013 ... Regarding the participation of legal entities and individuals in the investigation of terrorism, I think the Legislator is nonsense who didn’t think a bit (as always) of the wording of the amendments to the Law: lol: (with regards to the changes in Clause 4 of Article 3 of the Federal Law-35 ...) And, probably, the safety data sheets of the facilities will certainly force all entrepreneurs to conduct (another additional burden) for private business) ...

 

[Арсен]

Thanks Marat! But this bill is another idiocy of our right-wing amateurs. I wonder what the structures will do,
like the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the FSB? This is another stupid thing. In our country, entrepreneurs are not protected in any way, and additionally
offer to do another nonsense.

 

[Детектив-Юг]

In normal countries, this has been working for a long time and no one is bothering, everyone understands that this is for their safety, and the security services do not consist of two thugs with blunts.

But in principle, this is correct, merchants are simply obliged to create security conditions for their customers.
It should be added, and provide remote online access to video surveillance systems to law enforcement agencies.
Similar to communication systems, provided - you work, but no - they covered.

However, in reality, businessmen are only interested in profit and they are paralleled by what happens in their establishments, they sell drugs and young people hang out.
Some institutions, clubs of party-goers in general, in order to avoid problems, gather crowds of youngsters and cover them until the morning, and everyone understands what is happening there, Mouzon, drinks and everything that anyone needs.

 

[Роберт]

Well, I'm shocked at all. For ten years he was engaged in the organization and implementation of anti-terrorism measures. : cry: I’ve been responsible for my region for five years in my system: this is a complicated and expensive business, ordinary businessmen are not just far from it, it’s space for them. Access to video surveillance systems? Witty, they themselves do not want to buy-loaded on the business. Also through their firms they will be forced to buy at inflated prices. After all, it is not so easy to bring to the police, it is necessary that all this equipment dock with each other. And about the investigation, I am silent: D: D: D

 

[Роберт]

Why did you forget about detectives ?! This is basically a pro, even the masters of their craft sometimes come across: D how so ?!
A video can affect the security market. By posting a video, the business will limit private security payments. At best, this is a reduction in the security market.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Why did you forget about detectives ?! This is basically a pro, even the masters of their craft sometimes come across: D how so ?!
A video can affect the security market. By posting a video, the business will limit private security payments. At best, this is a reduction in the security market.

Robert))) Look at the changes to the Law))) In fact, there is nothing new (with the exception of some issues, maintaining a safety data sheet by a wider range of people ...)

 

[Роберт]

I look already.

 

[Детектив-Юг]

Well, I'm shocked at all. For ten years he was engaged in the organization and implementation of anti-terrorism measures. : cry: I’ve been responsible for my region for five years in my system: this is a complicated and expensive business, ordinary businessmen are not just far from it, it’s space for them. Access to video surveillance systems? Witty, they themselves do not want to buy-loaded on the business. Also through their firms they will be forced to buy at inflated prices. After all, it is not so easy to bring to the police, it is necessary that all this equipment dock with each other. And about the investigation, I am silent: D: D: D

Robert! It all depends on the approach to this issue, it is possible to swell (cut) billions of budget money and nothing will work.
And it’s possible to build everything perfectly at an affordable price. This can be done by commerce, especially by large, but the nominal ones already have almost everything. Only now nobody will let anyone into their garden.

 

[Роберт]

I know all these approaches. You can build, but the guards will still be reduced if so.
If you estimate, then a normal company spends about 1.5 million rubles on protection (if the protection does not have licenses, grandmothers are sitting, 5 per shift). This is the minimum where the guards get a minuscule. The effectiveness of them is zero, the maximum fright off the thieves and catch a drunk (at the factory). No one needs the extra costs now. It’s easiest for all grandmothers to dismiss and leave several watchmen at the gate and put the video system with one video observer per day.
Then we will normally fight terrorism: D here in St. Petersburg we have defense plants with only state money. Come, I don’t want to.