Imperfect Democracy or the Perfect World

[neowaypit]

“Democracy is imperfect, but mankind hasn’t come up with anything better,” said Winston Churchill.
Is it so?
A bird has two wings ... A planet has two poles ... Can you imagine a bird with one wing or a planet with one pole? Not? But it is in such an asymmetric society that we live, and it is such a one-winged world that we are building! Do not believe? Judge for yourself.
Science is developing by leaps and bounds and modern mankind knows what the British Prime Minister did not know. He did not know, for example, the Law of Identity of the Opposite. Meanwhile, this Law makes it possible to understand what the Communists were wrong in their time and what the Democrats are wrong in our time. Their main mistake is the CONTRADICTION between the OPPOSITE forms of ownership and power. You need to understand that we are talking about Private and State Property and, accordingly, about Personal and Public Power. If politicians did not come up with their own laws, but RECOGNIZED and instead of the term “lawmaking” armed themselves with the term LEGAL KNOWLEDGE (an objective law cannot be thought up - it can only be known), then things would go smoothly.
So, according to the Law of Identity of the Opposite, which, unfortunately, has not been taught in schools yet, the communists made a tragic mistake by putting state property NAD private and public power over personal. The result is a socio-economic crisis. The reason is a violation of the Law of Identity (EQUILIBRIUM) of the Opposite. In fact, they nationalized private property and socialized personality. What are democrats doing today? They do the same thing that the Communists did, only exactly the opposite. They privatized state property and the individual today virtually ignores social norms and principles. In other words, modern democracy is the arbitrary arbitrariness of the individual in relation to society. The result is a socio-economic crisis.
It is time, finally, to clarify once and for all - the bird should have TWO WINGS, and our economy should have TWO PROPERTY - Private and State.
Moreover, Private Property is not subject to nationalization, and State Property is not subject to privatization, and the one who did this committed an economic crime, chopping off one wing of an economic bird.
If we are guided by the OBJECTIVE Law of Identity of the Opposite, on which, by the way, the UNIVERSE stands, then you do not need to nationalize private property and do not need to privatize state property. You just need to sit down and find out, finally, what is private property and what is state property, and then transfer Private Property into the hands of the Person (PRODUCTION), and State Property into the hands of the Company (RAW). At the same time, one can even abandon the tax system (invented by the gentlemen for their lackeys), since it will be possible to produce private property and, therefore, be enriched only through the production of material and spiritual values, without taxing the Creator of these same values, but selling him raw materials for the production of his goods. If we allow a person to public property, then we will turn people not into creators, but parasites who will live off the exploitation of our natural wealth, and not through the production of goods and services (the so-called oligarch phenomenon).
Maybe enough to make the Universe laugh and it's time to finally build something better than democracy?