We work with information

[dron]

Each detective understands perfectly well that without any psychological portrait today no investigation or research is possible. But how much information is fully and effectively processed, how much information do we see or don’t see in the form of various markers? How much do we know the techniques and methods that give us knowledge of psychology, graphology, physiognomy, etc.? I suggest practicing studying some handwritten text. To do this, you should not rummage through the Internet and look for something like this, do not have to speculate and give names, the goal in another is to learn to see and learn to explain what you saw. Convincing request if someone has already seen this manuscript do not name the author’s surname, because this may prevent others from learning to work with the document — refrain from giving any names.
In order to structure your answers, I suggest answering the following questions:
Question No. 1 Is it a man or a woman? (which indicates this)
Question No. 2 This is a right-handed person, a left-hander, a retrained left-hander (which indicates this).
Question No. 3 Is this an aggressive person or not, if yes, what type of aggression do you see. (which indicates this).
Question No. 4 ** is it a thrifty person or not a thrifty person (which indicates this).
Question No. 5 Is it a strong-willed person or weak-willed? (which indicates this)
Question No. 6 This is an extrovert or introvert (which indicates this).
Question No. 7 ** Can such a person cause sympathy (trust). Why? (which indicates this).
Question No. 8 What do you think, what kind of education does this person have (higher, secondary or primary). (what does this indicate)?
Question No. 9 What do you think, how tall is this person? (Why do you think so)?
This is not a test of your suitability or anything else. You can give yourself ratings (if you want) at the end of the conference. Follow the conference in a few days, I will offer my own version with which you can compare your knowledge.

 

[dron]

I think this is not a bad opportunity to test your intuition and / or knowledge of graphology. And it’s possible to draw some knowledge.

 

[Kuznecov.Igorj]

Should a detective do this? There are specialists of this profile and it is unlikely that the detective will accurately determine this or that affiliation from the text. A simple training for such an examination, which not every graphologist can perform, I think is not enough. It’s just that, with nothing to do, test yourself.

 

[Орлан]

all the same, it is interesting and useful, because at work you come across different points.

 

[Александра]

I absolutely agree with Dmitry. In my opinion, a detective must be a diverse personality. In our practice, there are different situations and different people. And then it’s really interesting. We are waiting for an option to compare our knowledge.

 

[Дима-Минск]

A long time ago, about 4-5 years ago a guy from Uzbekistan offered me similar services, according to my list, he composed my psychological partret, but this was not relevant to me and I lost his contact

 

[dron]

I will ask you to follow the questions that have been asked in your comments. Perhaps they will be far from the truth, but this will allow the learning process. After some time of development of this branch, I will give my version and then there will already be a comparison (which you yourself will do). In the course of the development of the branch I will give leading questions. Do you agree with such regulations?

 

[Александра]

I agree

 

[dron]

The purpose of this conference is to teach to see what others do not see, unlike those who oppose the acquisition of new knowledge and new skills, they consider it stupid, they consider it not scientific. Their eyes are “blurred” to such an extent that they are obvious, they say that this is not - in my opinion this is a useful skill for a detective.
A simple example as a workout. Ask someone (assistant) to hold a coin in your hand secretly from you. How many times will you guess in which hand it is from 10 or 30 attempts? I am sure that no more than 50%. Children cope with this task in 90% of cases. The question is why? What has become wrong with you adults? The answer is obvious. Ask the child how he managed to guess so many times, he will not be able to explain this to you, but he will do better than you.
And one more example. If you were at resorts, then there are always many attractions for agility, accuracy of movements, etc. Some people willingly participate in this, even without the appropriate skills (they are not afraid and do not spare the money spent on this), others just look and pass by. Skills from the first attempt do not come, but unlike those who have not even tried, they do not even have feelings from the process. Here, in the same way, try your hand and skills, no one will take money from this. To teach to see something without trying to do this is impossible!
There will be comments on the topic, I will begin to prompt. I won’t just lay out my answer and understand that people don’t want even the slightest attempt to make themselves. But then it will turn out a simple reading, in a minute, you will forget about it.

 

[Александра]

I'm sorry, I do not know your name. Apparently I did not really understand your idea, tell me what to do? Do I understand correctly that it is necessary at the conference to answer the questions you posed from the 1-9th? And then you "decode" them