Those, but not quite those ... Trilogy ... part 1

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

In principle, it is now clear why all Soviet leaders so brutally suppressed dissent. Why did they so hate the past and its representatives. Why they so wanted to look like role models. And in life, and - especially - in biographies, which forced the “happy" Soviet people to study, as the saints used to do. Starting from kindergarten and introducing their biographical retouched layers into the curriculum in schools and universities. The paradox was that, having renounced the old world, they created a new world, according to new rules and with new people ...
... But if new rules could still be written, then there were nowhere to take new people. They had to be perelitsit and remodeled from the old "material" that they reared for the revolution, divided into warring irreconcilable classes, bleed in the civil war, and then crushed by the commissars crushed by the armed hordes gathered in the Red Army.

And they themselves didn’t really fit into the category of new people of the “world's first workers and peasants state”, which they intended to build on the site of the Russian Empire. Judge for yourselves: of the leaders of the October 1917 coup in the top five, Vladimir Lenin is a hereditary nobleman who ordered his classmates to be destroyed like dogs. Leon Trotsky is the son of a landowner-landowner, who was terribly happy when he found out that among some of the landowners the peasants tore the skin alive. Yakov Sverdlov is the son of a petty artisan bourgeois, among those who were primarily “reforged” into “new people”. Leo Kamenev (Rosenfeld) - the son of a privileged engineer. Grigory Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) - the son of a wealthy owner of a dairy farm ...

What can I say, when the first chief “reforger” of the country and people of that time, the “iron” Felix Dzerzhinsky was the son of a Polish nobleman who hardly spread his moral concepts and norms to communicate with workers, or even less so! - peasant slaves.

Nikita Khrushchev with his first wife Efrosinya Pisareva, who died in 1920. Nice peasant, huh?

It is also clear why the political and moral doctrine of the victorious society of “new people” was made by class racism, in which the workers and peasants proclaimed the foundation of the state, the only bearers of morality and truth, history and culture, the heirs of all that was good in the past, the smiths of everything, what is in the present and will be in the future. The most stupid, clogged, illiterate and uneducated sections of the population who wanted to compensate for their social and other inferiority at any cost, to make amends for their past dark and hopeless lives, were chosen as the basis. At least the removal of past evil and suffering that fell to their lot, on the former "masters of life." That is why, for example, in Poltava, the victorious Bolsheviks in the Cheka shot even the boys who had a trace of their cap on their hair. It seemed to the shooters that this was a trace from a gymnasium or cadet cap. And the workers and peasants in the gymnasium and cadets did not attend. For this, innocent executed children were avenged ...

In addition, it was very easy for the class-wise new people, "the backbone of the world's first worker-peasant state," to make their heads stupefied and then turn them into a herd of furious humanoids, who had lost their human essence, mercy and compassion, and set them on objectionable. Whoever set the first, he won. The first such herds shouted “Crucify!”. And in the 30s of the last century, their followers shouted "To shoot them like mad dogs!" Whom? And those who were pointed out by the clever manipulators who created the new life ...

At that time, the most important of them, of the "winners", Joseph Stalin, is also not quite a "new man." He is the son of a poor shoemaker, but he himself is a seminarian who, from childhood, inhaled “opium for the people”. And not without a trace: irrational fanaticism and intolerant ferocity in relation to "enemies" have always distinguished the actions of this leader. In addition, at any cost he dreamed of cutting out everyone who could remember his past, in which there was cooperation with the tsarist secret police (for the victory of the revolution), and a pure criminal - bank robberies ("exs" or "expropriations") and mail money to replenish the party treasury - and direct disobedience to the authorities, fraught with catastrophes of a national scale (cheating to annoy competitors, with orders during the Soviet-Polish war in 1920, which ended in the defeat of the Reds in Warsaw).

The first composition of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR. Solid workers and peasants ...

And remember this classic “... With glasses ... And he also put on his hat, a lousy intellectual!” Learned you on our head! " to those who even stood out in appearance from the gray bydlot mass and allowed themselves to disagree, contradict. And these are not the notions of filmmakers or journalists. It was, it was just recently ...

At the same time, the most hopeless children-townspeople, whose fathers and mothers could not attach to a “warm place”, or immigrants from villages who went to cities and clung there for new life in factories went to the “backbone” of Soviet society. How they hated those who are better organized! And how did they despise those who have already “nestled” in this life. And how the leaders rejoiced when they watched this inner squabble, from which one part was easy to set against another, and then all together brazen or intimidated all together. At the same time, when choosing the bosses, belonging to the working or collective farm classes was appreciated. The great game of everyone with everyone began in total pretense, which in the end, and undermined the country from the inside, collapsed it, like an ear on clay feet. The Stanovy Ridge was stupid, drunk and rotten, so it could not withstand either the internal ridges or the external blows of the real, not imaginary enemies of the state ...

... Well, it began in large numbers in the former USSR under the “peasant-worker” Nikita Khrushchev, who replaced the “son of the shoemaker” at the helm and even started a certain “thaw”: he let the people breathe more freely, and the leading core - in the form of a final refusal Stalinism and the practice of the cult of personality - guaranteed an unassailable future in the commission of those almost any crimes ...

Werewolf Semyon Zadionchenko, a friend of Nikita Khrushchev

But the secret really always becomes apparent. Over time, it became clear that the biographies of the leaders of the USSR and then Russia in the last century were mostly legendary. No exception - and the biography of the aforementioned Khrushchev. The canonical version says that he came from a peasant family. Not canonical - that he was the illegitimate son of a Polish landowner.

The biography of Nikita Khrushchev is even more than even Stalin's, hidden from prying eyes. If you read all his biographies, it turns out that he came from a family of Kursk peasants. Then he leaned into the workers. It turned out, as you know, an exemplary biography for the leader of the workers 'and peasants' state. However, data from the KGB archives say that Khrushchev was not at all what he claimed to be.

In particular, in the book of the KGB Schnick Nikolai Zenkovich “USSR. The most famous shoots ”casually says this. In 1938-1939, when Khrushchev worked as the first secretary in Ukraine, the new head of the NKVD, Lavrenty Beria, decided to arrange a check for the first persons of this republic. Recall that during these years there was a powerful purge of the power and party apparatus from the proteges of the "bloody dwarf" really working origin Nikolai Yezhov. Khrushchev, too, was one of the friends of the author of the system of "hedgehogs", and therefore checking himself, as well as those close to him, went with special zeal.

Unhappy steelworker-Stakhanovite Makar Mazay

And here, from the top of the administrative apparatus of Ukraine, masks began to fly. First we found out that the acting the head of the Dnepropetrovsk city executive committee (1938) and then the first secretary of the Dnepropetrovsk city party committee Semyon Zadionchenko (1938-1941) is not the person he pretended to be. Let us explain that the Dnepropetrovsk region then occupied a third of the territory of Ukraine - it also included the territory of the current Zaporizhzhya region, part of the Kherson and Donetsk regions. The key region of Ukraine is the industrially developed, densely populated.

So, Zadionchenko (Khrushchev’s best friend, who he personally brought from Moscow) was not a native of a poor Ukrainian family, as indicated in the questionnaires, but a Jewish Zayonchik. His father was an activist of the Jewish Socialist Party "Paoley Zion" and, concurrently, a wealthy artisan. And Semyon Borisovich himself had a completely different name - Shimon Borukhovich Zayonchik.

This Zadionchenko, by the way, is also indirectly to blame for the death of Makar Mazay, a worker, innovator and leader, “Stakhanov” heats ”at Azovstal in Mariupol. On October 8, 1941, the Germans entered this Mariupol, and it turned out that some metallurgical enterprises, including Azovstal, did not manage to evacuate. Work was going on at Azovstal, and the Germans captured this factory for the production of high-quality steels in fully operational condition. He began to work for the enemy without a pause. And the main culprit of the incident was precisely Zadionchenko, who by that time was not only not shot for forgery, but emerged as a member of the military council of the Southern Front. And this member, together with the command, criminally missed the approach of the enemy to the city, without giving the order to “knock over” the furnace in time. At the end of 1941, the Nazis created the Vostok mining and metallurgical society, which was supposed to operate the production facilities of the Donetsk coal basin, and decided to involve the Soviet Makar Mazay in their work. He also did not have time to retreat. Mazay was caught, tortured for a long time, but he refused to cooperate, for which he was shot ...

The grave of the "Ukrainian" Semyon Zadionchenko in Moscow

And Semyon Borisovich quite successfully survived this too. Moreover, he had already surfaced far from sin - in Bashkiria, the first secretary of the regional committee. Then he moved from Kemerovo in 1943. And also not to work at the mine, but the first secretary of the regional committee there. After was Moscow and work as an inspector of the Central Committee of the AUCPB. Career growth was slowed down only by the “fight against cosmopolitanism”: the Ukrainian pseudo-peasantry did not fail, and in 1950 it was not elected to the Supreme Council of the Council of Ministers of Soviet Socialist Republic, and in 1952 they trampled from the Central Committee of the CPSU. But not for long and not for good. They simply transferred to the Central Committee apparatus, where he worked until 1958, until he moved to a more peaceful place - to the apparatus of the Council of Ministers of the RSFSR to quietly and peacefully die in 1972 ...

The second caught one of Khrushchev’s best friends, and at the same time Yezhov’s protege, the head of the NKVD of Ukraine, Alexander Uspensky. The audit showed that he, too, was not the one he pretended to be. It was believed that he was the son of a forester from the Tula province. But it turned out that his father was a prominent Black Hundred, a merchant of the 2nd guild. Yes, and Alexander Ivanovich Uspensky himself, a 15-year-old teenager in early 1917, managed to mark himself in the pogrom of Jews evacuated from the front line near Tula. And here he is, a rare case in the history of punitive bodies in Russia: the head of the NKVD of Ukraine in November 1938, fled, staging suicide. For more than a year, he wandered around the USSR with five fake passports, until he was finally caught and then shot.

Adventurous was a man. In November 1938, Ouspensky was summoned to Moscow. But he was also an experienced person. And stained in blood, not just in the service of the workers 'and peasants' state, but at the direction of the same Nikolai Yezhov. It was this bloody undergrowth that gave Uspensky a sanction for the arrest of 36,000 people, Uspensky overfulfilled the “plan” and even became a member of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the Communist Party (Bolshevik) of Ukraine.

Alexander Uspensky, the failed son of a forester

But then Yezhov was arrested. And they took up his nominees. And instead of a trip to Moscow, Ouspensky imitated suicide. Leaving the note “Look for a corpse in the Dnieper ...” in his office, he threw his tunic and cap into an innocent river and disappeared. It must be admitted that for some time he nevertheless distracted the NKVD officers. And while they fumbled along the Dnieper, Ouspensky fled to Voronezh. First, the "forester's son" was there as a worker Ivan Lavrentievich Shmashkovsky. And then, running away from the All-Union wanted list, he leaned east.

On April 15, 1939, the fugitive executioner was arrested in Miass (Chelyabinsk Region) and fell into the reliable hands of the already promoted Beria. In them, he calmly pleaded guilty to both a counter-revolutionary conspiracy and espionage in favor of Germany. According to him, he was involved in the conspiracy back in 1934 by the then NKVD deputy commissar, GB commissar (by the way, a Russian nobleman from Kiev) Georgy Prokofiev, and he "spied" on the recruitment of his former head at the OGPU German Matson (a Latvian and a former joiner). I probably thought that in this way I would be saved, blaming others. But he miscalculated: Prokofiev was shot in 1937, and Matson in 1938. For what Ouspensky admitted. But he still won a little life - he was shot only in 1940.

Of course, in such situations, the turn came to Khrushchev. And it turned out that in the homeland of Khrushchev, in the village of Kalinovka, Kursk Region, all local residents called Nikita Sergeevich (as well as his sister) the illegitimate son of a local landowner - Pole Alexander Gasvitsky. The Gasvitsky family is an old Polish clan who came to the service of the Russian Tsar back in the 1670s. And so Nikita's mother, Ksenia (Aksinya) worked in the service of this landowner and allegedly "could not resist." Young business, yes ...

Khrushchev - in the center, 1924; at that time he was a Trotskyist. And still not a peasant dandy at all ...

Dad Gasvitsky, as a noble man, helped all his children. I tried to teach Nikita, but to no avail - he turned out to be incapable of assimilating knowledge. Realizing this, the landowner then still bought Nikita away from the army - in 1914 he was 20 years old, but he never got to WWI. Then Gasvitsky wrote a letter of recommendation to his acquaintance in Yuzovka - the landowner, German Kilyan Kirsh, and the Khrushchev family moved to a new place.

Nikita worked with Kirsch in the team managing the estate, but even here, due to natural stupidity, he was unable to prove himself in anything. And one road remained - to the Bolshevik revolutionaries. Compensate for someone else’s account what your own head didn’t ...

And then there was the rise of the workers and peasants Bolshevik from Yuzovka. Promacademy, acquaintance with the wife of Joseph Stalin, the leadership of Moscow, Ukraine. But the words of Vyacheslav Molotov are known, too, by the way, the proletariat of the clerks who forced their children to play the violin and write poetry, like intellectuals: “... We searched, but could not find the mine where Nikita Khrushchev worked.” This, therefore, to the fact that Khrushchev told his partigenigenoss all his life and wrote in questionnaires that he was “a worker, worked in a mine” ...

Nadezhda Alliluyeva - wife of the leader and girlfriend of the "proletariat" from Yuzovka

However, the “friends” knew everything. But they were silent, or didn’t want to attach importance to it, because they themselves were the same werewolves building “new life” as “new people” ...

... The mentioned Zenkovich, by the way, refers in his book to a tape recording of one of the conversations with Khrushchev. In it, he indirectly says that Stalin knew about the true origin of Khrushchev, and even before any verification of the NKVD. Here is this note by Nikita Sergeevich: “Once I arrived at a meeting of the Politburo. We sat and propped up the wall with Yezhov. Stalin entered the hall and immediately went to us. He came up, poked a finger on my shoulder and asked: "Your last name?". - "Comrade Stalin, I am Khrushchev and have always been Khrushchev." “No, you are not Khrushchev,” he always said so sharply, “you are not Khrushchev.” And he called some Polish name. - "What are you, Comrade Stalin, my mother is still alive ... The plant stands where I spent my childhood and worked ... My motherland Kalinovka in the Kursk region ...". “It says Yezhov.”

Yezhov began to deny. Stalin immediately called witnesses and called Malenkov. He referred that Malenkov told him about Ezhov’s suspicions that Khrushchev was not Khrushchev, but a Pole ... ”

Khrushchev and Stalin. They all knew about each other ...

... But then, apparently, such a commotion began, such blood poured that Stalin needed his comrades, stained with dirt and deception by their comrades, like air. Of these, they recruited guardsmen, ready for anything. They were like that. Khrushchev among them is a prominent figure. In the end, Stalin had to rely on someone at least. And to do your thing, perhaps the most noticeable act is to destroy all those who started this infamous business with Lenin and destroyed the country - the Russian Empire, turning it into a training ground for social experiments. The "Lenin Guard" went into oblivion, first under the ax of Stalin, and then - according to the court of history ...

But the way he did it, how much innocent blood was shed in addition to the one that went into the ground in a fratricidal civil war, levels everything that Stalin did. And his henchman Khrushchev. They tried to stop the blood with new blood, put out the fire with a new fire and burned everything almost to the ground. Everything died out on the ruins of their "new country" ...

... And it all happened so also because Nikita Alexandrovich Gasvitsky, originally from the Polish landowners, remained Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev, the son of a miner and a servant. I had to correct my biography too: to tell that in the eternal thirst for reading and writing banned from working children, I attended school in the winter and studied somehow, worked as a shepherd in the summer, and in 1908, at the age of 14, he moved with his family to the Uspensky mine near Yuzovka. There, dear young Khrushchev became an apprentice fitter at the Engineering and Iron Foundry of Eduard Bosse, from 1912 he worked as a mechanic at the mine and allegedly was not taken to the front as a miner in 1914. "Slanted", then, in a proletarian way ...

Khrushchev in 1968: after resigning from the post of head of the Soviet state, you can again look like a Polish man ...

... But the dull bastard, to his happiness, early realized the essence of the class struggle and the supremacy of the proletariat in it. And, as the pranksters noticed, the short biography of Khrushchev could sound like this. He put on the primitive and did not lose, because the primitive and, as they would say now, populist banality became the trump cards in the struggle for power in a vast country in which the people were promised happiness ...

But there is some unpleasant aftertaste: Lenin was a nobleman and a German intellectual, and he was not ashamed of this. And “Khrushchev” instead played all his life under the village fool who had become a proletarian ...

PS Vyacheslav Molotov, evaluating his more successful comrade-in-arms who drove him away from the “feeding trough”, wrote: “Khrushchev, he is a shoemaker in theory, he is an opponent of Marxism-Leninism, he is an enemy of the communist revolution, hidden and cunning, very veiled. .. No, he is not a fool. And why did they go for a fool? Then the last fools! And he reflected the mood of the vast majority. He felt the difference, felt good ... "

The ending follows.
Vladimir Skachko, based on materials from the Interpreter site
https://versii.com/news/259923/

the second and the shaking parts - https://iks-info.blogspot.com/ (if anyone likes it)

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Merci, Roman.

 

[Игорь Эдуардович]

Merci Roman, je l'ai lu avec intérêt!

 

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

Merci romych
"Matité naturelle" est une bonne expression ...: lol: Il y a toujours où appliquer!

 

[Растаман]

Remercier!!!

 

[Краев Евгений Леонидович]

Merci, intéressant!

 

[Патрушев Михаил Владимирович]

Merci Roman, voici les faits ... Je n'aurais jamais pensé.