Who has a specific experience - here

[Частный детектив Севастополь ОДБ]

Expert activity, in my opinion, is a piece of work rather problematic for a private detective. Somehow I was asked to conduct (or rather find out who is conducting) a chemical analysis of perfumery and clothing samples for the presence of OM, SDYAV and other harmful substances. And they asked for an official conclusion of an authorized expert body. They did it, but the conclusion was only given to me to rewrite and asked to destroy after meeting the customer. So the topic is interesting.

 

[Anonymous]

Do not open your mouth to someone else’s piece, the old Russian proverb says. Expert activity is not a piece of private investigator’s work, but a piece of expert’s work. The help of the client in choosing a specific type of examination and expert also depends on what level of detective.
Warning the client about the incompetent work of an expert, that’s the direct and holy duty of the detective and any other lawyer. This is the power.
I’ll look at the examples with pleasure and comment on how I will post my own.

 

[Детективное агентство. Москва. Арбат.]

The topic is complex and interesting, unfortunately I did not deal with the examinations, only earlier in the service, and even that was purely on drug control topics, so I will listen with interest to the advice of colleagues.

 

[Детективное агентство. Украина. Харьков. Львов.]

We often work with experts. In particular cases, they do not give a CONCLUSION, but a DEFINITION. What is the difference, I don’t know, but they say that the second can be given to the sovereign people in private, and the first is no-no.
But this document has weight in court.

 

[Частный детектив. Ильдар. Уфа.]

The topic is interesting, it is necessary to develop it .... From my practice, I can’t tell anything yet ...

 

[Anonymous]

We often work with experts. In particular cases, they do not give a CONCLUSION, but a DEFINITION. What is the difference, I don’t know, but they say that the second can be given to the sovereign people in private, and the first is no-no.
But this document has weight in court.

Any printed document confirming or refuting any arguments of the parties to the dispute has weight in court. The expert’s opinion is a procedural document confirming that the examination was carried out by decision of a court, investigator, etc. and in fact is evidence. The definition (in our country it’s just a certificate of research, or a specialist’s opinion, or an act of research, etc.) is for now just a document that will be evaluated as evidence only in court and court. From this the status of these documents is different. Moreover, for an error in the conclusion (if it is established by the court and confirmed by another expert opinion), the expert bears criminal liability, for the determination is not, as this was not warned in writing. The determination is easier to challenge, and in some cases even recognized as false, and in this case a completely different responsibility is provided. Now I am working in this direction, as I finish I will show it clearly.

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

We often work with experts. In particular cases, they do not give a CONCLUSION, but a DEFINITION. What is the difference, I don’t know, but they say that the second can be given to the sovereign people in private, and the first is no-no.
But this document has weight in court.

Any printed document confirming or refuting any arguments of the parties to the dispute has weight in court. The expert’s opinion is a procedural document confirming that the examination was carried out by decision of a court, investigator, etc. and in fact is evidence. The definition (in our country it’s just a certificate of research, or a specialist’s opinion, or an act of research, etc.) is for now just a document that will be evaluated as evidence only in court and court. From this the status of these documents is different. Moreover, for an error in the conclusion (if it is established by the court and confirmed by another expert opinion), the expert bears criminal liability, for the determination is not, as this was not warned in writing. The determination is easier to challenge, and in some cases even recognized as false, and in this case a completely different responsibility is provided. Now I am working in this direction, as I finish I will show it clearly.

Colleagues, I apologize!
Andrei, I don’t understand what you are talking about, talking about for an error in the conclusion (if this is established by the court and confirmed by another expert opinion), the expert is criminally liable; . Registration is carried out as a certificate, and the conclusion (and all official requests)! In both cases, the expert puts his signature and is responsible.

I don’t know where, but in Ukraine Definition called expert help and issued on the basis of a request from an authorized person to resolve the issue of initiating UD.
CONCLUSION the expert gives on the basis of the investigator’s request during the investigation of the DD.
THOSE. thing docks go through examination twice - and not always the same expert

On the issue of examination in private, the problem is practically insoluble.
I do not remember a single positive case, with the exception of establishing the identity of DNA in the case of proof of kinship.

Yours faithfully

 

[Детективное агентство. Украина. Харьков. Львов.]

On the issue of examination in private, the problem is practically insoluble.
I do not remember a single positive case, with the exception of establishing the identity of DNA in the case of proof of kinship.

Hello, Roman! There are precedents, and at the same time, hochmi - as you - cytological examination of her husband’s cowards? : D

 

[Anonymous]

On the issue of examination in private, the problem is practically insoluble.
I do not remember a single positive case, with the exception of establishing the identity of DNA in the case of proof of kinship.

Hello, Roman! There are precedents, and at the same time, hochmi - as you - cytological examination of her husband’s cowards? : D

And suddenly there are still living lice left with blood and DNA installed ...: lol:

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

On the issue of examination in private, the problem is practically insoluble.
I do not remember a single positive case, with the exception of establishing the identity of DNA in the case of proof of kinship.

Hello, Roman! There are precedents, and at the same time, hochmi - as you - cytological examination of her husband’s cowards? : D

And suddenly there are still living lice left with blood and DNA installed ...: lol:

Sergey, Andrey and All Everything - hello to you !!

Lord you will not get bored !! : lol:: lol:
Pubic louse (even dead) can serve as an object of study.
She (the bastard) drinks blood
Well, no one was ever immune from the stupidity!
God give us this fate passed: lol:

Yours faithfully