Not recommend

[Владимир.V.]

Hello detectives.
I categorically do not recommend using various devices with the help of which they suggest revealing a lie.
With the help of voice analyzers it is impossible to make a determination, a lie or the truth.
The use of these devices is scientifically unfounded.

 

[Anonymous]

I completely agree with you, even the polygraph data (and this is a whole complex of reading information about human reactions) are not used in any country as evidence that a person is telling the truth or falsehood ...

 

[Владимир.V.]

If I’m not mistaken in some states of the United States, the polygraph is proof, and in Russia there are precedents for conducting these examinations from the court (although in the Russian Federation the polygraph is not the main evidence, but given the fact that the judge making the decision is also based on deep internal conviction, then some combinations in court polygraph applicable).

 

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

In Primorye, we have such a comrade, Vetokhin Yuri Nikolaevich, an expert polygraph examiner, and so he constantly gives testimony in court, the court periodically attracts him as a specialist, his opinion is accepted with a bang in court ...

 

[Владимир.V.]

That's it. But in our country it turns out an incident, polls are conducted, the court accepts conclusions, but officially there is no such profession But in countries of the decaying west, there is also a profession recently appeared in Ukraine.

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

That's it. But in our country it turns out an incident, polls are conducted, the court accepts conclusions, but officially there is no such profession But in countries of the decaying west, there is also a profession recently appeared in Ukraine.

A small clarification - in Ukraine this profession is already a year
three commercials (plus or minus). In courts, expert opinion is accepted in
quality of evidence (few specialists, the problem is not in the equipment,
but in the interpretation ... (in the qualification of a specialist)). In power structures
in n / a l / s is periodically obliged to undergo a procedure ... along with a psychologist.
The first time the polygraph was started to be applied to employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs at the end
80s of the 20th century (in the city of Zaporozhye, sent from all over the district).
Yours faithfully

 

[Владимир.V.]

That's it. But in our country it turns out an incident, polls are conducted, the court accepts conclusions, but officially there is no such profession But in countries of the decaying west, there is also a profession recently appeared in Ukraine.

A small clarification - in Ukraine this profession is already a year
three commercials (plus or minus). In courts, expert opinion is accepted in
quality of evidence (few specialists, the problem is not in the equipment,
but in the interpretation ... (in the qualification of a specialist)). In power structures
in n / a l / s is periodically obliged to undergo a procedure ... along with a psychologist.
The first time the polygraph was started to be applied to employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs at the end
80s of the 20th century (in the city of Zaporozhye, sent from all over the district).
Yours faithfully

This refers to the official register of professions. In Ukraine, this profession (in the register of professions) appeared less than a year. There is no such profession in the Russian Federation.
All of the activities you listed have been and are underway.
The first time a polygraph came to the USSR in the 197s was from Polish comrades, to them from the Americans (I could be wrong in the chain).
In law enforcement agencies, the polygraph has been used since Soviet times, and in private practice since 1994 (maybe a little earlier).
In Ukraine, respectively, the polygraph has been used since Soviet times, in private practice since 1994 (maybe a little later).

 

[Anonymous]

Hello detectives.
I categorically do not recommend using various devices with the help of which they suggest revealing a lie.
With the help of voice analyzers it is impossible to make a determination, a lie or the truth.
The use of these devices is scientifically unfounded.

Americans, Israelis and Western Europe have long used VSA in various versions (Voice Stress Analysis) and the voice bark detector is widely used by their special services. Of course, this is not for ships, but for operational use. One of the latest developments thrown to the US market (for "private traders") costs 6500 USD.
It can be assumed that they release things more seriously for their special services.

And these things work quite well, at the level of modern polygraphs, but much less depend on the level of training of the operator ..

 

[Aleксей]

Sorry, I was at the top - the guest .

It’s just unusual that you can post to a forum without being registered ..

 

[Владимир.V.]

Hello detectives.
I categorically do not recommend using various devices with the help of which they suggest revealing a lie.
With the help of voice analyzers it is impossible to make a determination, a lie or the truth.
The use of these devices is scientifically unfounded.

Americans, Israelis and Western Europe have long used VSA in various versions (Voice Stress Analysis) and the voice bark detector is widely used by their special services. Of course, this is not for ships, but for operational use. One of the latest developments thrown to the US market (for "private traders") costs 6500 USD.
It can be assumed that they release things more seriously for their special services.

And these things work quite well, at the level of modern polygraphs, but much less depend on the level of training of the operator .. [/ quot
Voice is one channel, it is impossible to make reliable conclusions on one channel.
Voice analyzers appeared not long ago, if they are used by special services and this is a serious thing, then they are unlikely to be released for "private traders". I also doubt the use of voice analyzers by special services, because the percentage of errors is large, and for operational purposes it is not worth using a pitchfork on water, there are good old working methods. The voice analyzer cannot be compared to a polygraph.
Personally, my opinion is some kind of divorce.