- Entrou
- Mai 17, 2011
- Mensagens
- 112
- Reaction score
- 7
- Pontos
- 18
- Idade
- 59
- Localização
- Оренбургская область
- Website
- www.liesdetection.com
RU
Using one manuscript as an example, I will show how the technique works in cases where a person is trying to evade responsibility.
As a rule, we have 2 topics in their manuscripts. The first topic is related to the description of the event that is incriminated to the person. Or just the event, the cause of which is this or that proceedings. The second is how third parties (police officers) violated their work while doing something (human rights). Only the first topic is checked. The second topic is not checked, it may be present, but it is not checked for lies. Accordingly, the customer has the opportunity to see for himself what the person pays more attention to the injustice committed against him or the fact of the crime. This can be seen by the volume of the writings of a particular topic. Further, one can reason as follows: “If he is lying about the crime, then what difference does he give evidence under torture or not? If he does not lie about the crime, then it is important how the evidence was obtained from him.” If the subject, describing torture, will clearly imagine everything and respond to the letter, it turns out that by doing so he reduces his veracity in relation to the crime that he is charged with. If he will be extremely brief in the description of unacceptable methods, then the Caligrapher will regard this as evidence without lies, evidence that is credible. So, the ratio of the description of a truthful, but affected person should be 3: 2 or even 4: 1. parts of the volume of handwritten text in relation to these two topics. A lying person trying to defend himself with a “fig leaf” - the wrong actions of the police will be 1: 1 or even 1: 3. parts of the text. This is understandable to judges and investigators and prosecutors. The customer may not talk about this to his client; then he himself will be able to see (roughly with large errors) an express diagnosis of lies.
If I check both of them for a lie, it will be a methodically incorrect method. I need to know at least some true information about a person in order to build on it. Information about torture I initially accept is true (with some assumptions). If it is necessary to verify it, her polygraph examiner should be warned, and then I will remove information about the crime (incident) from the analysis for lies, and whether torture (or other unlawful investigation methods) was the main topic. This can be useful when considering administrative cases when the fact of violation is not disputed, but the fact of unlawful actions of controlling structures is disputed.
I understand that the sitters have a lot of time. But you need to limit them to the time of writing the document. Optimum 1-1.30 hours, but no more, otherwise they begin to write in caligraphic handwriting, devoid of any emotions. It is not right. Therefore, the column introduced the start and end time of writing the document. To write 5 sheets of time is enough.
In this example, a person was accused and convicted of robbery involving murder.
The first thing you should pay attention to from 5 control questions, he answered only 3
"Do you intend to give true testimony regarding the crime?", "Have you lied about anyone?" "Have you ever done what you could be arrested for?" But they were enough to calculate emotions when writing an explanation.
I do not give figures of probability with which the program calculated the manuscript. I give here only the calculation algorithm performed in the illustrative material. About how the caligraph works when it detects a lie. Let me remind you that blue means calm (lack of lies), green means a slightly excited state (false is unlikely), yellow is an alarming state (a person doesn’t remember exactly what he writes or doesn’t want to remember about it, the lie is medium-probable, it did not reach the threshold values), red - a person is in a state of emotion of fear or anger (further it becomes clear from the phrase itself written by the subject). Lie verotna with a high degree.
Pay attention to how he describes the event of the day on which the crime is committed. Literally, he writes that he was at home and drank alcohol. But he doesn’t write whether he was away from home, which is quite likely to commit a robbery at this moment. He doesn’t describe any details. He doesn’t describe what he was charged with, the description of the witnesses, or what is missing from the manuscript. And this is no coincidence. The program painted this fragment in yellow. Next, pay attention to the phrase: “I could not kill a man”. A phrase written by a schoolboy would be convincing, but a person who had previously been convicted and was serving a sentence, no. It was no coincidence that he wrote, "I could not kill a man," and not, "I did not kill such and such." If he wrote the second sentence, that would be a clear lie, and he was afraid that this lie detector would "see." But the caligrapher also recognized his masked lie in the first phrase, so he painted this phrase in red. The rest of the phrases painted red for lie detection are of secondary importance - they are auxiliary elements.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EN
On the example of one manuscript, I will show how the technique, in cases when a person tries to shirk responsibility.
We are usually in their writings there are 2 threads. The first topic is connected with the description of events that incriminated person. Or simply an event which there is a reason for a particular trial. The second is how third parties (the police) do this work for something broken (human rights). It checks only the first topic. The second theme is not checked, it could were present, but it is not checked for lies. Accordingly, the customer has the opportunity to see myself on that one pays more attention to the injustice committed against him or the fact of the crime. This can be seen scribbling in terms of a topic. Then we can argue as follows: "If he's lying about a crime, then what's the difference if he gave testimony under torture or not? If he's not lying about the crime, then it is important as it had been received from the testimony." If the subject, describing the torture will be all clear idea and respond to the letter, it turns out that it reduces its credibility it in relation to the crime of which he is accused. If it will be very brief in describing the unlawful methods, Calligraphy will regard this as evidence without lying, that testimony credible. So in the normal ratio at a truthful description, but the injured person should be 3: 2 or even 4: 1. Parts of handwriting in relation to these two topics. The man who lies have someone trying to protect "fig leaf" - wrong actions the police will be 1: 1 or even 1: 3. parts of the text. This is understandable, and judges and investigators and prosecutors. The customer can not talk about it, then his client and himself can be seen (roughly with large errors) rapid diagnosis of lies.
If I check both for a lie this is methodologically not correct reception. I need to know about a person at least some accurate information in order to push off from it. Information about the torture I was originally priimayu true (with some assumptions). If you want to check it was the polygraph examiner should be warned and then I have information about the crime (incident) will be removed from the analysis on the subject of lies, and put the focus was whether the torture (or other unlawful methods of investigation). This can be useful in rasmotrenii administrative cases, when a violation is not contested, and contested fact irregular actions of regulatory agencies.
I understand that the inmates of time very much. But you have to limit their time of writing. Optimally 1-1.30 hours, but no more, and then they start writing kaligrafskim hand, devoid of any emotion. This is not correct. So put the graph beginning and end of writing. To write 5 pages of time is enough.
In this example, a man was accused of committing and osuzhdn robbery coupled with the murder.
The first thing you should pay attention of the 5 control issues, he said, interpretation of 3
"You are going to give truthful testimony about the crime?", "You lied about someone else?" "Have you ever done something for which you have been arrested?". But their was enough to calculate the emotions when you write an explanation.
I do not include the figures of probability with which the program is designed manuscript. I cite here only the algorithm executed in illustrating the article. About how to work Calligraphy, when detects a lie. Let me remind you, the blue color means tranquility (the lack of a lie), slightly green-excited state (lie was unlikely), yellow-anxiety (people just do not remember is writing about or do not want to think about it, lies the medium is possible, it did not reach porogvyh values), red-state man is in the emotions of fear or anger (hereinafter it is clear from the very phrases written in the subject). Verotna lie with a high degree.
Notice how he describes the event of the day, in which the crime was committed. Literally, he writes that he was at home and drank alcohol. But does not say whether absented himself anywhere in the house, which is likely at this point and is attacked. Nor any details without opisyvaet.Ne describes what he blamed, evidence, witnesses, description, or anything in the manuscript no. This is no accident. Programa this piece dyed yellow. Next, note the phrase: "I could not kill chelveka" phrase written by a schoolboy would have been convincing, but the man who had previously been convicted and served his sentence, no. It is no accident he wrote "I could not kill a man" rather than "I did not kill this, then something." If he wrote the second sentence, it would be an obvious lie, and he feared that the lie detector "sees". But Calligraphy recognize him in disguise and lie in the first sentence, so that phrase, he painted in red. Other phrases painted in red to the detection of deception are of secondary importance, they are vspmogatelnye elements.
Using one manuscript as an example, I will show how the technique works in cases where a person is trying to evade responsibility.
As a rule, we have 2 topics in their manuscripts. The first topic is related to the description of the event that is incriminated to the person. Or just the event, the cause of which is this or that proceedings. The second is how third parties (police officers) violated their work while doing something (human rights). Only the first topic is checked. The second topic is not checked, it may be present, but it is not checked for lies. Accordingly, the customer has the opportunity to see for himself what the person pays more attention to the injustice committed against him or the fact of the crime. This can be seen by the volume of the writings of a particular topic. Further, one can reason as follows: “If he is lying about the crime, then what difference does he give evidence under torture or not? If he does not lie about the crime, then it is important how the evidence was obtained from him.” If the subject, describing torture, will clearly imagine everything and respond to the letter, it turns out that by doing so he reduces his veracity in relation to the crime that he is charged with. If he will be extremely brief in the description of unacceptable methods, then the Caligrapher will regard this as evidence without lies, evidence that is credible. So, the ratio of the description of a truthful, but affected person should be 3: 2 or even 4: 1. parts of the volume of handwritten text in relation to these two topics. A lying person trying to defend himself with a “fig leaf” - the wrong actions of the police will be 1: 1 or even 1: 3. parts of the text. This is understandable to judges and investigators and prosecutors. The customer may not talk about this to his client; then he himself will be able to see (roughly with large errors) an express diagnosis of lies.
If I check both of them for a lie, it will be a methodically incorrect method. I need to know at least some true information about a person in order to build on it. Information about torture I initially accept is true (with some assumptions). If it is necessary to verify it, her polygraph examiner should be warned, and then I will remove information about the crime (incident) from the analysis for lies, and whether torture (or other unlawful investigation methods) was the main topic. This can be useful when considering administrative cases when the fact of violation is not disputed, but the fact of unlawful actions of controlling structures is disputed.
I understand that the sitters have a lot of time. But you need to limit them to the time of writing the document. Optimum 1-1.30 hours, but no more, otherwise they begin to write in caligraphic handwriting, devoid of any emotions. It is not right. Therefore, the column introduced the start and end time of writing the document. To write 5 sheets of time is enough.
In this example, a person was accused and convicted of robbery involving murder.
The first thing you should pay attention to from 5 control questions, he answered only 3
"Do you intend to give true testimony regarding the crime?", "Have you lied about anyone?" "Have you ever done what you could be arrested for?" But they were enough to calculate emotions when writing an explanation.
I do not give figures of probability with which the program calculated the manuscript. I give here only the calculation algorithm performed in the illustrative material. About how the caligraph works when it detects a lie. Let me remind you that blue means calm (lack of lies), green means a slightly excited state (false is unlikely), yellow is an alarming state (a person doesn’t remember exactly what he writes or doesn’t want to remember about it, the lie is medium-probable, it did not reach the threshold values), red - a person is in a state of emotion of fear or anger (further it becomes clear from the phrase itself written by the subject). Lie verotna with a high degree.
Pay attention to how he describes the event of the day on which the crime is committed. Literally, he writes that he was at home and drank alcohol. But he doesn’t write whether he was away from home, which is quite likely to commit a robbery at this moment. He doesn’t describe any details. He doesn’t describe what he was charged with, the description of the witnesses, or what is missing from the manuscript. And this is no coincidence. The program painted this fragment in yellow. Next, pay attention to the phrase: “I could not kill a man”. A phrase written by a schoolboy would be convincing, but a person who had previously been convicted and was serving a sentence, no. It was no coincidence that he wrote, "I could not kill a man," and not, "I did not kill such and such." If he wrote the second sentence, that would be a clear lie, and he was afraid that this lie detector would "see." But the caligrapher also recognized his masked lie in the first phrase, so he painted this phrase in red. The rest of the phrases painted red for lie detection are of secondary importance - they are auxiliary elements.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EN
On the example of one manuscript, I will show how the technique, in cases when a person tries to shirk responsibility.
We are usually in their writings there are 2 threads. The first topic is connected with the description of events that incriminated person. Or simply an event which there is a reason for a particular trial. The second is how third parties (the police) do this work for something broken (human rights). It checks only the first topic. The second theme is not checked, it could were present, but it is not checked for lies. Accordingly, the customer has the opportunity to see myself on that one pays more attention to the injustice committed against him or the fact of the crime. This can be seen scribbling in terms of a topic. Then we can argue as follows: "If he's lying about a crime, then what's the difference if he gave testimony under torture or not? If he's not lying about the crime, then it is important as it had been received from the testimony." If the subject, describing the torture will be all clear idea and respond to the letter, it turns out that it reduces its credibility it in relation to the crime of which he is accused. If it will be very brief in describing the unlawful methods, Calligraphy will regard this as evidence without lying, that testimony credible. So in the normal ratio at a truthful description, but the injured person should be 3: 2 or even 4: 1. Parts of handwriting in relation to these two topics. The man who lies have someone trying to protect "fig leaf" - wrong actions the police will be 1: 1 or even 1: 3. parts of the text. This is understandable, and judges and investigators and prosecutors. The customer can not talk about it, then his client and himself can be seen (roughly with large errors) rapid diagnosis of lies.
If I check both for a lie this is methodologically not correct reception. I need to know about a person at least some accurate information in order to push off from it. Information about the torture I was originally priimayu true (with some assumptions). If you want to check it was the polygraph examiner should be warned and then I have information about the crime (incident) will be removed from the analysis on the subject of lies, and put the focus was whether the torture (or other unlawful methods of investigation). This can be useful in rasmotrenii administrative cases, when a violation is not contested, and contested fact irregular actions of regulatory agencies.
I understand that the inmates of time very much. But you have to limit their time of writing. Optimally 1-1.30 hours, but no more, and then they start writing kaligrafskim hand, devoid of any emotion. This is not correct. So put the graph beginning and end of writing. To write 5 pages of time is enough.
In this example, a man was accused of committing and osuzhdn robbery coupled with the murder.
The first thing you should pay attention of the 5 control issues, he said, interpretation of 3
"You are going to give truthful testimony about the crime?", "You lied about someone else?" "Have you ever done something for which you have been arrested?". But their was enough to calculate the emotions when you write an explanation.
I do not include the figures of probability with which the program is designed manuscript. I cite here only the algorithm executed in illustrating the article. About how to work Calligraphy, when detects a lie. Let me remind you, the blue color means tranquility (the lack of a lie), slightly green-excited state (lie was unlikely), yellow-anxiety (people just do not remember is writing about or do not want to think about it, lies the medium is possible, it did not reach porogvyh values), red-state man is in the emotions of fear or anger (hereinafter it is clear from the very phrases written in the subject). Verotna lie with a high degree.
Notice how he describes the event of the day, in which the crime was committed. Literally, he writes that he was at home and drank alcohol. But does not say whether absented himself anywhere in the house, which is likely at this point and is attacked. Nor any details without opisyvaet.Ne describes what he blamed, evidence, witnesses, description, or anything in the manuscript no. This is no accident. Programa this piece dyed yellow. Next, note the phrase: "I could not kill chelveka" phrase written by a schoolboy would have been convincing, but the man who had previously been convicted and served his sentence, no. It is no accident he wrote "I could not kill a man" rather than "I did not kill this, then something." If he wrote the second sentence, it would be an obvious lie, and he feared that the lie detector "sees". But Calligraphy recognize him in disguise and lie in the first sentence, so that phrase, he painted in red. Other phrases painted in red to the detection of deception are of secondary importance, they are vspmogatelnye elements.
Original message
RU
На примере одной рукописи я покажу как работает методика, в случаях когда человек пытается уйти от ответственности.
У нас, как правило, в их рукописях есть 2 темы. Первая тема, связана с описанием события которое инкриминируют человеку. Или просто событию причиной котрого есть то или иное разбирательство. Вторая это то, как третьи лица (сотрудники милиции) делая свою работу что-то нарушили (права человека). Проверяется только первая тема. Вторая тема не проверяется, она может присутсвовать, но она не проверяется на предмет лжи. Соответственно у заказчика есть возможность увидеть самому на что человек обращает большее внимание на несправедливость допущенную в отношении него или на сам факт преступления. Это видно по объему писанины той или иной темы. Далее можно рассуждать следующим образом: " Если он врет по поводу преступления, то какая разница дал ли он показания под пыткой или нет? Если он не врет по поводу преступления, далее важно как были получены от него показания." Если испытуемый, описывая пытки будет все четко себе представлять и реагировать в письме, получается что этим он снижает свою правдивость по отношению к преступлению, которое ему инкриминируют. Если он будет предельно краток в описании недозволенных методов, то Калиграф расценит это как показания без лжи, показания которые заслуживают доверия. Так что в норме соотношение описания у правдивого, но пострадавшего человека должно быть 3:2 или даже 4:1. частей объема рукописного текста по отношению к двум этим темам. У лгущего человека, пытающегося защититься "фиговым листом" - неправильными действиями сотрудников милиции будет 1:1 или даже 1:3. частей текста. Это понятно и судьям и следователям и прокуратуре. Заказчик может про это не говорить своему клиенту- тогда и сам может увидеть (грубо с большими погрешностями) экспресс диагностику лжи.
Если я буду проверять и то и другое на предмет лжи это будет методически не верный прием. Мне нужно знать о человеке хоть какую-либо правдивую информацию, чтобы от нее отталкиваться. Информацию о пытках я изначально приимаю правдивой (с некоторыми допущениями). Если нужно будет проверять именно её полиграфолог должен быть предупрежден и тогда я информацию о преступлении (происшествии) буду убирать из анализа на предмет лжи, а основной темой ставить были ли пытки (или другие недозволенные методы следствя). Это может быть полезным при расмотрении административных дел, когда факт нарушения не оспаривается, а оспаривается факт неправомерных действий контролирующих структур.
Я понимаю, что у сидельцев времени очень много. Но надо ограничивать их по времени написания документа. Оптимально 1-1.30 часа, но не более, а то они начинают писать калиграфским почерком, лишенным всяких эмоций. Это не правильно. Поэтому введена графа время начала и окончания написания документа. Для написания 5 листов времени вполне достаточно.
В данном примере человек был обвинен и осуждн в совершении разбойного нападения сопряженного с убийством.
Первое на что следует обратить внимание из 5 контрольных вопросов он ответил толко на 3
"Вы намерены давать правдивые показания относительно преступления?","Вы лгали относительно кого либо?" "Вы когда-либо делали то, за что Вас могли арестовать?". Но и их хватило, для расчета эмоции при написании объяснения.
Я не привожу цифры вероятности с которой программа расчитала рукопись. Я привожу здесь лишь алгоритм расчета выполненный в иллюстрирующем материале. О том как работает калиграф, когда выявляет ложь. Напомню, синий цвет означает спокойствие (отсутсвие лжи), зеленый- слегка возбужденное состояние (ложь мало вероятна), желтый- тревожное состояние (человек точно не помнит о чем пишет или не хочет об этом вспоминать, ложь средне-вероятна, она не достигла порогвых значений ), красный цвет- человек находится в состоянии эмоции страха или гнева (далее это становится понятно из самой фразы написанной испытуемым). Ложь веротна с высокой степенью.
Обратите внимание на то, как он описывает событие дня, в который совершено преступление. Буквально он пишет, что находился дома и пил спиртное. Но не пишет отлучался ли куда-либо из дома, что вполне вероятно и в этот момент совершить разбойное нападение. Ни какие детали при этом не описывает.Не описывает то что ему вменяли в вину- улики, описание свидетелей, ни чего в рукописи нет. И это не случайно. Програма окрасила этот фрагмент в желтый цвет. Далее обратите внимание на фразу: "Я не мог убить челвека" Фраза написанная школьником была бы убедительна , но человеком, который ранее уже был судим и отбывал наказание-нет. Не случайно он написал "Я не мог убить человека", а не "Я не убивал такую-то тогда-то". Если бы он написал вторую фразу, то это было бы явной ложью, и он боялся что это детектор лжи "увидит". Но калиграф распознал и его замаскированную ложь в первой фразе, поэтому эту фразу он окрасил в красный цвет. Остальные фразы окрашенные в красный цвет к детекции лжи имеют второстепенное значение- они есть вспмогательные элементы.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EN
On the example of one manuscript, I will show how the technique, in cases when a person tries to shirk responsibility.
We are usually in their writings there are 2 threads. The first topic is connected with the description of events that incriminated person. Or simply an event which there is a reason for a particular trial. The second is how third parties (the police) do this work for something broken (human rights). It checks only the first topic. The second theme is not checked, it could were present, but it is not checked for lies. Accordingly, the customer has the opportunity to see myself on that one pays more attention to the injustice committed against him or the fact of the crime. This can be seen scribbling in terms of a topic. Then we can argue as follows: "If he's lying about a crime, then what's the difference if he gave testimony under torture or not? If he's not lying about the crime, then it is important as it had been received from the testimony." If the subject, describing the torture will be all clear idea and respond to the letter, it turns out that it reduces its credibility it in relation to the crime of which he is accused. If it will be very brief in describing the unlawful methods, Calligraphy will regard this as evidence without lying, that testimony credible. So in the normal ratio at a truthful description, but the injured person should be 3:2 or even 4:1. Parts of handwriting in relation to these two topics. The man who lies have someone trying to protect "fig leaf" - wrong actions the police will be 1:1 or even 1:3. parts of the text. This is understandable, and judges and investigators and prosecutors. The customer can not talk about it, then his client and himself can be seen (roughly with large errors) rapid diagnosis of lies.
If I check both for a lie this is methodologically not correct reception. I need to know about a person at least some accurate information in order to push off from it. Information about the torture I was originally priimayu true (with some assumptions). If you want to check it was the polygraph examiner should be warned and then I have information about the crime (incident) will be removed from the analysis on the subject of lies, and put the focus was whether the torture (or other unlawful methods of investigation). This can be useful in rasmotrenii administrative cases, when a violation is not contested, and contested fact irregular actions of regulatory agencies.
I understand that the inmates of time very much. But you have to limit their time of writing. Optimally 1-1.30 hours, but no more, and then they start writing kaligrafskim hand, devoid of any emotion. This is not correct. So put the graph beginning and end of writing. To write 5 pages of time is enough.
In this example, a man was accused of committing and osuzhdn robbery coupled with the murder.
The first thing you should pay attention of the 5 control issues, he said, interpretation of 3
"You are going to give truthful testimony about the crime?", "You lied about someone else?" "Have you ever done something for which you have been arrested?". But their was enough to calculate the emotions when you write an explanation.
I do not include the figures of probability with which the program is designed manuscript. I cite here only the algorithm executed in illustrating the article. About how to work Calligraphy, when detects a lie. Let me remind you, the blue color means tranquility (the lack of a lie), slightly green-excited state (lie was unlikely), yellow-anxiety (people just do not remember is writing about or do not want to think about it, lies the medium is possible, it did not reach porogvyh values), red-state man is in the emotions of fear or anger (hereinafter it is clear from the very phrases written in the subject). Verotna lie with a high degree.
Notice how he describes the event of the day, in which the crime was committed. Literally, he writes that he was at home and drank alcohol. But does not say whether absented himself anywhere in the house, which is likely at this point and is attacked. Nor any details without opisyvaet.Ne describes what he blamed, evidence, witnesses, description, or anything in the manuscript no. This is no accident. Programa this piece dyed yellow. Next, note the phrase: "I could not kill chelveka" phrase written by a schoolboy would have been convincing, but the man who had previously been convicted and served his sentence, no. It is no accident he wrote "I could not kill a man" rather than "I did not kill this, then something." If he wrote the second sentence, it would be an obvious lie, and he feared that the lie detector "sees". But Calligraphy recognize him in disguise and lie in the first sentence, so that phrase, he painted in red. Other phrases painted in red to the detection of deception are of secondary importance, they are vspmogatelnye elements.
На примере одной рукописи я покажу как работает методика, в случаях когда человек пытается уйти от ответственности.
У нас, как правило, в их рукописях есть 2 темы. Первая тема, связана с описанием события которое инкриминируют человеку. Или просто событию причиной котрого есть то или иное разбирательство. Вторая это то, как третьи лица (сотрудники милиции) делая свою работу что-то нарушили (права человека). Проверяется только первая тема. Вторая тема не проверяется, она может присутсвовать, но она не проверяется на предмет лжи. Соответственно у заказчика есть возможность увидеть самому на что человек обращает большее внимание на несправедливость допущенную в отношении него или на сам факт преступления. Это видно по объему писанины той или иной темы. Далее можно рассуждать следующим образом: " Если он врет по поводу преступления, то какая разница дал ли он показания под пыткой или нет? Если он не врет по поводу преступления, далее важно как были получены от него показания." Если испытуемый, описывая пытки будет все четко себе представлять и реагировать в письме, получается что этим он снижает свою правдивость по отношению к преступлению, которое ему инкриминируют. Если он будет предельно краток в описании недозволенных методов, то Калиграф расценит это как показания без лжи, показания которые заслуживают доверия. Так что в норме соотношение описания у правдивого, но пострадавшего человека должно быть 3:2 или даже 4:1. частей объема рукописного текста по отношению к двум этим темам. У лгущего человека, пытающегося защититься "фиговым листом" - неправильными действиями сотрудников милиции будет 1:1 или даже 1:3. частей текста. Это понятно и судьям и следователям и прокуратуре. Заказчик может про это не говорить своему клиенту- тогда и сам может увидеть (грубо с большими погрешностями) экспресс диагностику лжи.
Если я буду проверять и то и другое на предмет лжи это будет методически не верный прием. Мне нужно знать о человеке хоть какую-либо правдивую информацию, чтобы от нее отталкиваться. Информацию о пытках я изначально приимаю правдивой (с некоторыми допущениями). Если нужно будет проверять именно её полиграфолог должен быть предупрежден и тогда я информацию о преступлении (происшествии) буду убирать из анализа на предмет лжи, а основной темой ставить были ли пытки (или другие недозволенные методы следствя). Это может быть полезным при расмотрении административных дел, когда факт нарушения не оспаривается, а оспаривается факт неправомерных действий контролирующих структур.
Я понимаю, что у сидельцев времени очень много. Но надо ограничивать их по времени написания документа. Оптимально 1-1.30 часа, но не более, а то они начинают писать калиграфским почерком, лишенным всяких эмоций. Это не правильно. Поэтому введена графа время начала и окончания написания документа. Для написания 5 листов времени вполне достаточно.
В данном примере человек был обвинен и осуждн в совершении разбойного нападения сопряженного с убийством.
Первое на что следует обратить внимание из 5 контрольных вопросов он ответил толко на 3
"Вы намерены давать правдивые показания относительно преступления?","Вы лгали относительно кого либо?" "Вы когда-либо делали то, за что Вас могли арестовать?". Но и их хватило, для расчета эмоции при написании объяснения.
Я не привожу цифры вероятности с которой программа расчитала рукопись. Я привожу здесь лишь алгоритм расчета выполненный в иллюстрирующем материале. О том как работает калиграф, когда выявляет ложь. Напомню, синий цвет означает спокойствие (отсутсвие лжи), зеленый- слегка возбужденное состояние (ложь мало вероятна), желтый- тревожное состояние (человек точно не помнит о чем пишет или не хочет об этом вспоминать, ложь средне-вероятна, она не достигла порогвых значений ), красный цвет- человек находится в состоянии эмоции страха или гнева (далее это становится понятно из самой фразы написанной испытуемым). Ложь веротна с высокой степенью.
Обратите внимание на то, как он описывает событие дня, в который совершено преступление. Буквально он пишет, что находился дома и пил спиртное. Но не пишет отлучался ли куда-либо из дома, что вполне вероятно и в этот момент совершить разбойное нападение. Ни какие детали при этом не описывает.Не описывает то что ему вменяли в вину- улики, описание свидетелей, ни чего в рукописи нет. И это не случайно. Програма окрасила этот фрагмент в желтый цвет. Далее обратите внимание на фразу: "Я не мог убить челвека" Фраза написанная школьником была бы убедительна , но человеком, который ранее уже был судим и отбывал наказание-нет. Не случайно он написал "Я не мог убить человека", а не "Я не убивал такую-то тогда-то". Если бы он написал вторую фразу, то это было бы явной ложью, и он боялся что это детектор лжи "увидит". Но калиграф распознал и его замаскированную ложь в первой фразе, поэтому эту фразу он окрасил в красный цвет. Остальные фразы окрашенные в красный цвет к детекции лжи имеют второстепенное значение- они есть вспмогательные элементы.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EN
On the example of one manuscript, I will show how the technique, in cases when a person tries to shirk responsibility.
We are usually in their writings there are 2 threads. The first topic is connected with the description of events that incriminated person. Or simply an event which there is a reason for a particular trial. The second is how third parties (the police) do this work for something broken (human rights). It checks only the first topic. The second theme is not checked, it could were present, but it is not checked for lies. Accordingly, the customer has the opportunity to see myself on that one pays more attention to the injustice committed against him or the fact of the crime. This can be seen scribbling in terms of a topic. Then we can argue as follows: "If he's lying about a crime, then what's the difference if he gave testimony under torture or not? If he's not lying about the crime, then it is important as it had been received from the testimony." If the subject, describing the torture will be all clear idea and respond to the letter, it turns out that it reduces its credibility it in relation to the crime of which he is accused. If it will be very brief in describing the unlawful methods, Calligraphy will regard this as evidence without lying, that testimony credible. So in the normal ratio at a truthful description, but the injured person should be 3:2 or even 4:1. Parts of handwriting in relation to these two topics. The man who lies have someone trying to protect "fig leaf" - wrong actions the police will be 1:1 or even 1:3. parts of the text. This is understandable, and judges and investigators and prosecutors. The customer can not talk about it, then his client and himself can be seen (roughly with large errors) rapid diagnosis of lies.
If I check both for a lie this is methodologically not correct reception. I need to know about a person at least some accurate information in order to push off from it. Information about the torture I was originally priimayu true (with some assumptions). If you want to check it was the polygraph examiner should be warned and then I have information about the crime (incident) will be removed from the analysis on the subject of lies, and put the focus was whether the torture (or other unlawful methods of investigation). This can be useful in rasmotrenii administrative cases, when a violation is not contested, and contested fact irregular actions of regulatory agencies.
I understand that the inmates of time very much. But you have to limit their time of writing. Optimally 1-1.30 hours, but no more, and then they start writing kaligrafskim hand, devoid of any emotion. This is not correct. So put the graph beginning and end of writing. To write 5 pages of time is enough.
In this example, a man was accused of committing and osuzhdn robbery coupled with the murder.
The first thing you should pay attention of the 5 control issues, he said, interpretation of 3
"You are going to give truthful testimony about the crime?", "You lied about someone else?" "Have you ever done something for which you have been arrested?". But their was enough to calculate the emotions when you write an explanation.
I do not include the figures of probability with which the program is designed manuscript. I cite here only the algorithm executed in illustrating the article. About how to work Calligraphy, when detects a lie. Let me remind you, the blue color means tranquility (the lack of a lie), slightly green-excited state (lie was unlikely), yellow-anxiety (people just do not remember is writing about or do not want to think about it, lies the medium is possible, it did not reach porogvyh values), red-state man is in the emotions of fear or anger (hereinafter it is clear from the very phrases written in the subject). Verotna lie with a high degree.
Notice how he describes the event of the day, in which the crime was committed. Literally, he writes that he was at home and drank alcohol. But does not say whether absented himself anywhere in the house, which is likely at this point and is attacked. Nor any details without opisyvaet.Ne describes what he blamed, evidence, witnesses, description, or anything in the manuscript no. This is no accident. Programa this piece dyed yellow. Next, note the phrase: "I could not kill chelveka" phrase written by a schoolboy would have been convincing, but the man who had previously been convicted and served his sentence, no. It is no accident he wrote "I could not kill a man" rather than "I did not kill this, then something." If he wrote the second sentence, it would be an obvious lie, and he feared that the lie detector "sees". But Calligraphy recognize him in disguise and lie in the first sentence, so that phrase, he painted in red. Other phrases painted in red to the detection of deception are of secondary importance, they are vspmogatelnye elements.
