How to evaluate the work of security?

[Бедеров Игорь Сергеевич]

Training anxiety is an indicative and most difficult way to check the operation of a security system. When planning such a test, first of all, it is necessary to determine what, in fact, needs to be assessed: the speed and correctness of the response of the security service to an attempt to physically penetrate the object, the quality of the candidate’s check for filling a vacant position, the speed of detecting theft or the level of security of a computer network ... Important circumstance - who and how will record the reaction of the security service and the final result. You can control only one segment of the investigated section of the security system. For example, when checking the same physical security service of an object, first of all, through simple observation, it is necessary to evaluate the vigilance of security personnel at the post. An easier way is to conduct a “truncated” check. The conditional offender must either demonstrate an intention to cross the perimeter, or create the appearance of an attempt to enter the protected area. Another option is to organize a precedent for the unauthorized removal of material assets. For example, you want to check the quality of work of the security service for monitoring premises for the absence of technical channels for acquiring information. In this case, it is enough to fix the time of tossing and identifying the "bug". Around the same control theft is carried out. You can verify the actions of the entire security complex and employees at the signal "ALARM". The principle is the same as for the actions on the signal “FIRE ALARM”: everyone must accurately fulfill their duties. It would be worthwhile to make sure that expensive audio and video surveillance equipment is used really effectively. The test of the vigilance of the HR manager and security service will be a control attempt to get a job with a company employee with dubious documents or negative facts in a biography. Is it necessary to check how much the company’s personnel trust the security service? Or can this problem be considered insignificant and ignored? But if an employee who owns confidential information suddenly finds himself in a situation of blackmail or excessive custody by competitors, you cannot be absolutely sure that the first person he will contact will be the head of the Security Council. The basis of this method is a system of indicators developed by the company, which may include the following: - objective requirements. For example, the appearance of the employee (especially if it affects the quality of fulfilling duties), the state of the post (workplace), labor discipline (absenteeism, lateness, violation), etc .; - knowledge of theory and practice. Achieved by training and education (checked by the certification commission or direct supervisor). This indicator is somewhat subjective, but it works out skills well; - the overall results of the work of the entrusted sector of the company (there is theft - the indicator decreases, the violator is identified - the indicator increases); - unscheduled inspections. Conducted with the help of "training" violators, etc. Each of these criteria can be “tied” to a part of the salary, thus, incentives will be provided for SB employees.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Thank!