They want to plant a Kievite for the acquisition of two trinkets ...

[Игорь Коракс]

The Kievites want to put for the acquisition of two trinkets on the Internet - the case was led by the SBU

On March 23, the Kiev Solomensky court will judge the metropolitan system administrator of 28-year-old Andrei Fenchenko. Last year, he ordered two trinkets, a flashlight, and a penknife from a Chinese online store.

The man is accused of smuggling, the case was conducted by the Security Service of Ukraine. Andrei faces up to seven years in prison.

“In May 2011 I made an order at the officially registered Dial Extreme store. The purchase cost almost $ 40, the key rings were $ 11 each, the flashlight was $ 3-4 I paid everything at once with my credit card,” said Andrei Gazeta.ua.

In June, when the time for delivery of the parcels approached, Andrei turned to his post office. They said several times that there was no parcel yet. In the inquiry of Ukrposhta, the men reported that there were already parcels, but they were detained by customs.

“I turned to customs for explanations regarding the reasons for the detention, then at first they said that they hadn’t detained anything. Then they nevertheless accepted an application for the search for parcels. I wrote twice about the contents of the parcels and about where and how I ordered. For two months I handed a decision to institute criminal proceedings under Article 201 part 1 (smuggling) and article 359 part 1 (purchase, use and sale of special technical means of secret information taking). Such key chains are freely sold in many Ukrainian online stores and abroad There is no warning anywhere that they are prohibited. Yes, and how they can be prohibited if they can be used as a webcam, and besides, they have visible USB connectors, LED recording indicators. The case was raised at the customs, then transferred to the SBU "They said that the customs knew better if they opened a case."

After that, investigators from the SBU came home, conducted a search, offered to voluntarily issue key rings, which were at customs, and called for interrogations. We tried at home to conduct investigative reproduction, as I went to the Internet, where I ordered goods.

“They insisted that I could make the order only on my home computer, although I did not say where and how I ordered. I suggested showing them on my computer how I did it,” the man recalls. “In September I was with the investigator’s lawyer. I was struck by a question "Why do I need a flashlight if the lights shine on the street in the evening?"

On February 28, the investigator handed Andrei two decisions to institute criminal proceedings and a decision to prosecute him as an accused. They took a recognizance not to leave the house and a subscription not to disclose the confidentiality of the investigation.

"I realized that in Ukraine, citizens, in principle, do not have the opportunity to find out if this or that subject is a special technical means of tacitly obtaining information before it is acquired. There is no such mechanism in the state. An examination is done only after the acquisition, and no one will give the list of prohibited technical devices , because it can be done only by examination and only in each individual case.The scheme is as follows: you turn to the SBU (police, customs) with the question, is it possible to purchase a certain device there and there, will it be forbidden? In response, they will tell you that it is necessary to conduct an examination of this device, but the examination can only be done if this device is available, as a result, you will buy it, and if then the examination shows that it is a prohibited item, then there is no turning back. by the authorities not for the purpose of concern for the security of the people, but for the purpose of protection from the people

According to Andrey, everything was sent officially, by Ukrposhta, with declarations. Arguments that everything is correctly indicated there were not accepted. It is believed that if the goods were banned, they should be detained at customs.

“And they smiled, said that they would look for a package. They deceived at every step, and then decided to raise statistics by me,” he says. “Now, the investigators explained that two key rings are already serious. If I ordered one, it’s another matter and two is a repeated crime aggravating. It threatens to seven years. I hope for a suspended sentence, because there is a small child. "

The Kievite learned that in Ukraine there are many people who have faced a similar situation.

“I met a man who received a suspended sentence of 4 years for a parcel,” he said. - If I ordered in America, then there could also be similar problems. The main thing here is that the parcel came from abroad. "

Bogdana Evseeva
Source: Link is not valid.

 

[Орлан]

just go nuts, and nothing more to say! fucking indicators.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Sad

 

[Патрушев Михаил Владимирович]

FBU just do not know where else you can cut down "sticks"!
This is not serious...!

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

FBU just do not know where else you can cut down "sticks"!
This is not serious...!

Unfortunately, this is more than serious for the layman:!::!::!:

just go nuts, and nothing more to say! fucking indicators.

That's why there is nowhere more serious

The main thing here is that the parcel came from abroad

And 90% purchased in domestic "stores" are controlled by the same

 

[Евгений СБ]

Nonsense. SBU should be ashamed of such indicators.

 

[Краев Евгений Леонидович]

But the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation said that such devices will be STS only if the citizen has the intention specifically for their tacit use to obtain information. On April 9, the court will decide on my case, and then I will sort through the whole process of holding accountable from the very beginning and indicate the documents that can be referenced in Russia.

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

Nonsense. SBU should be ashamed of such indicators.

Indicators - first of all: P: P : D
What can be ashamed here ?? : roll:

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

But the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation said that such devices will be STS only if the citizen has the intention specifically for their tacit use to obtain information. On April 9, the court will decide on my case, and then I will sort through the whole process of holding accountable from the very beginning and indicate the documents that can be referenced in Russia.

Will wait!

 

[Частный детектив. Тайный советник. Омск.]

But the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation said that such devices will be STS only if the citizen has the intention specifically for their tacit use to obtain information. On April 9, the court will decide on my case, and then I will sort through the whole process of holding accountable from the very beginning and indicate the documents that can be referenced in Russia.

Will wait!

I agree, I would like to get acquainted.


In general, under this article, I believe that this is not the SBU’s estate, but the police. And let the SBU engage in state security, as it should functionally.