Good day to all!
Thanks to Andrey Matushkin for giving me temporary access here, I think it will be interesting to know to everyone Dear.
On May 22, 2013, between the client’s company and the “Armenak Group” International Center, represented by Deputy Director Armen Hayrapetyan (Yerevan), an agreement was signed on the provision of legal services. The client’s problem was that his company entered into an agreement with a Chinese company for the supply of office paper, in August 2012 the customer’s company transferred money to the supplier’s Chinese company in accordance with the concluded contract in the amount of 42.475 US dollars, after which the Chinese company disappeared, there is no money or goods. According to the assurances of Armen Hayrapetyan, he has good contacts and partners in China, and therefore offered his services. A. Hayrapetyan was given the task of collecting complete information on the respondent firm. To which A. Hayrapetyan announced the amount of $ 1,500 for his services. On May 24 of this year, the client’s company transferred the indicated amount to the current account indicated by A. Hayrapetyan in the contract in full. To execute the order, A. Hayrapetyan was provided with the following documents: copies of the agreement between the client’s company and the Chinese company, copies of bank payment orders for transferring money, all correspondence between the client and the defendant, including phone numbers and bank account of the Chinese company, the results of studies on IP addresses of specialists of the client’s company and other useful information. On June 7, 2013 A. Hayrapetyan was given the “final” (I specifically quote it, because this is the only report and the word “final” cannot be used here either as the report arrives or as information is available in it), which I I’m posting striking out information regarding the interests of the client, as regards the interests of A. Hayrapetyan, of course I protect them too, but there is nothing like that in his “report”, I think after reading this you will agree. After that, A. Hayrapetyan proposed the second stage. With all due respect to A. Hayrapetyan (I still had positive impressions from talking with him), what second stage can be discussed, when there was no first phase either. To say that the client did not like this “report” is to say nothing, his reaction is understandable, in particular, I also agree with the client in this regard, the “report” of A. Hayrapetyan does not stand up to criticism and is really worthless. However, I am posting this "report" for evaluation by the Dear. On the claims made by me, A. Hayrapetyan informed that the transferred amount is not large. The question is, who set the price of the question? If A. Hayrapetyan announced a different amount and it would be acceptable for the client, then there are no problems, the price of the issue was set by A. Hayrapetyan himself and was fully paid by the client. To my credit, A. Hayrapetyan will say that he said that his reputation is important to him and he promises to send a more detailed report. But now I don’t see the point. Since the work of A. Hayrapetyan was appreciated by his so-called “final” report, the client no longer needs another report, and even more so the “second” stage proposed by A. Hayrapetyan. Unfortunately, query executors do not always directly encounter customers, and a colleague who is directly in contact with the client and who assured the client of the completeness and quality of work, as well as who respects his honor and dignity, has to pout. Therefore, the question of China remains open, and if there are trusted people, I’m ready to close this question for my personal pocket. And I would like to wish Armen more reliable "partners" in China and say that the price of their honor is $ 1,500, and with all due respect I would like to tell him "I’m not sure of the quality of my work in a particular country or direction, it’s better not to take up this order, "it would be better, the reputation would have been preserved, and so sorry for each other, thanks to your Chinese" partners "your reputation has been damaged, again sorry for the friend, nothing personal. And now I would like to justify my words based on the “report” of A. Hayrapetyan for which he received the money in full (I highlighted the questions in the report). So, all the questions in the report.
For the sake of decency, I’ll say that the report contains new telephone numbers established by Armen, the reliability of which I do not know. As a result, we can conclude that it is NOT RECOMMENDED to work with Armen Hayrapetyan in China, he did not fully justify the trust in China, I do not know about other regions. It is up to you to decide whether to work with him in the future or not. I just want to warn you, maybe I will keep the honor and trust of the Dear and respectable colleague, and I will be immensely glad. If Armen completes his business to the end as agreed, or if he can’t complete the business and honestly return the money to the client, then he’s ready to apologize to him and take his words regarding his reputation back. In the meantime, I'm sorry Armen, the work done by you is not worth one dollar, your reputation is very badly damaged, do not be offended, nothing personal. As you promised, I am waiting for a detailed report, but nevertheless I consider it necessary to inform Dear people, in case of your complete refusal or the provision of false information on your part, I will subscribe to the words that you are a person who knows how to compose interesting fairy tales for a decent amount! Once again, nothing personal.
Original message
