LITERATURE FOR LAWYERS, LAWYERS AND PRIVATE DETECTIVES

[Роберт]

I believe that the practice of specific cases will be much more useful. I’m re-reading Conan Doyle, also interesting: D

 

[Детективное агентство Москва.]

Robert, you're probably investigating things like Sherlock Holmes. : D
But seriously, the tone of my opinion Arsen is right:

I suggested and recommended Robert, and whether you agree or not your business, everyone thinks differently. This literature is devoted directly to the process of proof and is very interesting, at least to me, and if you are not interested, you can not read it.

I think that refreshing something in memory will not hurt everyone, but everyone decides it.

 

[Роберт]

So you can simply wallow in theory, the practice is somewhat different. And the courts interpret evidence in every way. The Supreme Court gives a final assessment of the specific cases, analyzing each in detail. What, this is not interesting?
I’ll be silent about things, I just like Doyle’s presentation style.
About the proof.
Well, for example, practice is closer to me.

 

[Арсен]

So you can simply wallow in theory, the practice is somewhat different. And the courts interpret evidence in every way. The Supreme Court gives a final assessment of the specific cases, analyzing each in detail. What, this is not interesting?
I’ll be silent about things, I just like Doyle’s presentation style.
About the proof.
Well, for example, practice is closer to me.

Robert this literature is not laws, but an indicator of the proper collection of evidence. It is on this basis that I recommended
read book data. And then the decision of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation? If you think like that, then not one evidence has for the court contagion
established legal force. In our country, courts (most) evaluate evidence based on financial
indicator.

 

[Роберт]

I'm talking about the Supreme Court, and you're talking about the courts in general. And the indicator of "collection" of evidence is a court decision. By the way, it doesn’t have for the court. Therefore, evidence is considered in court for their admissibility.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Answering Robert))) And this literature, the list of which is provided for acquaintance with Arsen, is just “written” taking into account the requirements for evidence presented by the courts of various instances, too ... Science is “written” on the basis of practical experience ... So the topic probably right ...

 

[Роберт]

Answering Robert))) And this literature, the list of which is provided for acquaintance with Arsen, is just “written” taking into account the requirements for evidence presented by the courts of various instances, too ... Science is “written” on the basis of practical experience ... So the topic probably right ...

: D: D: D