Private detective Minsk - SCAM in Belarusian. http://detective.ucoz.ru/

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

We are not looking for easy ways ...: lol:
And sometimes it's even interesting to read ...

 

[Адвокат]

Dear users!
Searchagency.narod.ru is my site, and not Andrei whom you blame on this forum for all sins, like the belpoisk.ucoz.net that Andrei gave me is the first. Second - I do not understand why you are blocking and trying to discredit the name that I am trying to develop. I know Andrei very well, indeed he was unable to complete several orders, and only a few otherwise when working with clients, a person does everything promptly, beautifully, and from the high moral side of the issue ..... Question by Andrey (Alexandrovich, Sergey, how are you call it) is that a person just missed something, or maybe too lazy to do something, or there was no way to do it, in the absence of time or other problems . He would never hide from anyone or do this. I don’t stand up for this person, I’ll just say this, I studied at the Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for 5 years for SEF and worked for seven years in the operational service of the BEP, with all this, I can see people through and think that I can understand people. Such people as Andrei still need to be searched, he never “threw anyone” He is still young, hasty, ambitious and not too judicious, did not serve in the authorities, so he can’t make all orders, although even after this hype he tries to complete and close all his questions that he is accused of. I am sure of this person, but he is simply not a performer, he is good at taking orders, but not fulfilling them. Everyone should have a role. I ask you to stop trampling a person, he is certainly to blame, but who is not to blame? A man is trying to close orders on the material plane of the issue. I try to help him with this. I ask you to stop writing about MY SCAM, Searchagency.narod.ru and belpoisk.ucoz.net which belong to me to Individual Entrepreneur Kozhevnikov Alexander Stepanovich.
Thanks in advance to Alexander!

Alexander.

1) If you decide to intercede for Andrei, please explain what prevented him from during the nearly 2 months during which our forum was discussing his "activities" to meet with the customer and remove doubts about his decency.

2) If you consider him your friend, help a friend return the money to the customer for an unproven service. Maybe your friend just does not have time to get to the customer? : o

3) How do you prove that you are not the same person who did not fulfill obligations to the customer?

I apologize for being straightforward, but I would like to objectively understand the situation.

Your friend through his actions casts a shadow not only on himself and his immediate environment, but also on all detective activity in general. And our Association cannot but respond to such actions.

 

[частный детектив Северодвинск]

good afternoon . () What about a colleague from Minsk - I met him about 4 months ago. After this incident, Dmitry Viktorchik turned out to be dishonest (this is my opinion and some operational information, a source from the authorities). Coincidentally, someone wrote an agent to their own security service (CSS). co. about my cooperation with the authorities. In Minsk and Belarus, someone dismisses private detectives and prevents them from working. An illustrious prime minister is Aleksandrovich, he was handed over by one of the detectives (I cannot say from ethics) but this is reliable and honest information that I learned from directly from acquaintances from the EC <?. Александровичу просто недают работать ( следят, перебивают клинтов и если вы зададите этот вопрос этому человека и он соврет, я могу представить доказательство.
and answer the question: why there are few detectives in Belarus (about 4). People come, but they are destroyed.

2) If you consider him your friend, help a friend return the money to the customer for an unproven service. Maybe your friend just does not have time to get to the customer? : Answer
Aleksandrovich returned the money to all debtors. Why the customer cannot explain how much information was presented to her and what money and how much to return. We have a civil court in Belarus, and if a person believes that they should return the money, he should approach from the legal side. And I think that this is a fake customer. And one cannot believe a person who has not presented evidence of deception. A person who speaks the truth does not hide the name.

3) How do you prove that you are not the same person who did not fulfill obligations to the customer? my phone number is given and name and surname. I think that if a person makes a reservation differently, then he should give the name and surname of that person and he will be called if he is not a coward and tells the truth.

 

[Адвокат]

Alexander.

1) You begin to contradict yourself. First write that "a person just missed something, or maybe he was too lazy to do something, or there was no way to do it, for lack of time or other problems" , and then declare that the customer cannot explain how much money should be returned to her ... The customer wrote that your friend does not wish to meet her. Why? Maybe at this meeting all questions would be clarified?

2) Even if you believe your statement that Aleksandrovich is not allowed to work, I do not see any obstacles to returning money to the client for the service that was not rendered. Why does Aleksandrovich not return money if he is so honest, how do you write about him? You begin to recall the civil court. Probably for good reason. Fraudsters, as a rule, do not conclude agreements with their victims, and if they do, then those with which there is nothing to do in the courts. If your friend is a decent person, his contract should reflect the conditions that he negotiated with the customer, and the act of delivery and acceptance of work performed should reflect their volume, customer complaints and the timing of their elimination.

I believe that you remembered the civil court for the very reason that the customer has no such documents. The conclusion suggests itself ...... and alas - not in favor of Aleksandrovich.

I hope you do not suspect me of intending to create obstacles for your friend in his detective work.

3) You unreasonably and unfoundedly blame our colleague with whom the MOD has been cooperating for a long time and is confident in its reliability.
If you have facts confirming the dishonesty of Dmitry, but you do not want to report them on the forum, you can call Andrey Matushkin. If you do not have such facts, then you are spreading slander.

4) As for the phones, as far as I understand, all the phones whose numbers you published are mobile ...

 

[частный детектив Северодвинск]

First write about the fact that "a person just missed something, or maybe he was too lazy to do something, or there was no way to do it, for lack of time or other problems"
Answer::?: You respected lawyer came up with these words. they were not written by me and please be correct and do not invent.

the customer is a fictional person. So, a contract for the provision of information services is always concluded. and if there was a customer, then let her name and surname, and I undertake to provide her passport details (telephones and residences) and is there such a person in nature. If such a person exists, you can contact him or call, and find out everything from him - is it true or lies

 

[частный детектив Северодвинск]

3) You unreasonably and unfoundedly blame our colleague with whom the MOD has been cooperating for a long time and is confident in its reliability.
If you have facts confirming the dishonesty of Dmitry, but you do not want to report them on the forum, you can call Andrey Matushkin. If you do not have such facts, then you are spreading slander.

answer: As far as I know, and earlier it was discussed at the forum that Dmitry and Aleksandrovich worked together, including on Russian orders. And the fault is only on Alexandrovich.

4) As for the phones, as far as I understand, all the phones whose numbers you published are mobile ...
Yes

 

[Адвокат]

First write about the fact that "a person just missed something, or maybe he was too lazy to do something, or there was no way to do it, for lack of time or other problems"
Answer::?: You respected lawyer came up with these words. they were not written by me and please be correct and do not invent.

Alexander. Carefully read your message posted on page 7 of this topic and you will find that I quoted your phrase.

 

[Адвокат]

3) You unreasonably and unfoundedly blame our colleague with whom the MOD has been cooperating for a long time and is confident in its reliability.
If you have facts confirming the dishonesty of Dmitry, but you do not want to report them on the forum, you can call Andrey Matushkin. If you do not have such facts, then you are spreading slander.

answer: As far as I know, and earlier it was discussed at the forum that Dmitry and Aleksandrovich worked together, including on Russian orders. And the fault is only on Alexandrovich.

At the forum, Vadim from Vladivostok wrote that he was called by Aleksandrovich, who said that he allegedly worked with Dmitry, but Dmitry denied this information. There was no other discussion on this subject.
If I’m not right, you can correct me by copying a link to a specific page of the forum as evidence.

 

[частный детектив Северодвинск]

and why are you talking about facts when there is not a single fact regarding Aleksandrovich. And you call him a "scammer."
You violate legal vocabulary, be correct in the future. Only a court can convict a person under Art. Fraud, and you yourself admit, is wrong and not competent. sorry if offended

 

[Адвокат]

Alexander.

Please, kindly re-read my posts and you will see that I did not call anyone a scammer.

A complaint has been posted regarding Aleksandrovich. The man still has not considered it necessary to come to us and explain the situation. This circumstance leads to certain thoughts ......

For some reason you began to protect him.
How well are you aware of Alksandrovich’s activities to claim that he has no problems with customers, in particular, with Magda?