رواية بوليسية. المباحث الخاصة. أوكرانيا.

[Евгений СБ]

Well then litter .....: oops:

By the way, Sasha is right .... Once a serious thread appears, then the topic will be filled with "trash" and the thread of the topic is lost .....

So people are talking! Sometimes, however, a little addicted: D

So no one is against, but then we ourselves can’t find it, who wrote where? )))

Communication costs: D

 

[Саратов-Алиби]

Zhenya, the costs of communication were on page 10 of this topic.

 

[Евгений СБ]

:lol:

 

[Орлан]

we had a report with the newspaper "today", Igor Koraks posted the text on the forum.
they wrote such nonsense, and they also did not send a text for approval (although they agreed) that I’m glad that the article does not have our name.

 

[Саратов-Алиби]

we had a report with the newspaper "today", Igor Koraks posted the text on the forum.
they wrote such nonsense, and they also did not send a text for approval (although they agreed) that I’m glad that the article does not have our name.

So it’s not in vain that “Hamil” ............: lol:: lol:: lol:

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

we had a report with the newspaper "today", Igor Koraks posted the text on the forum.
they wrote such nonsense, and they also did not send a text for approval (although they agreed) that I’m glad that the article does not have our name.

The newspaper "Today" - a politically oriented ....

 

[Sevhelp]

Journalists always only understand the point of slander, they promise one thing, and they print a completely different one, or also in a different interpretation. That turns advertising into anti-advertising:!:

 

[Евгений СБ]

Journalists always only understand the point of slander, they promise one thing, and they print a completely different one, or also in a different interpretation. That turns advertising into anti-advertising:!:

Maybe they were given a decree from the “top” - nothing good about detectives. So they write, scribblers.

 

[Саратов-Алиби]

I say it’s not in vain "Hamil" ........

 

[Sevhelp]

Journalists always only understand the point of slander, they promise one thing, and they print a completely different one, or also in a different interpretation. That turns advertising into anti-advertising:!:

Maybe they were given a decree from the “top” - nothing good about detectives. So they write, scribblers.

I agree Zhenya! It may sound ironic, but journalists are a fairly controlled group of people. But not everyone can control it and they clearly feel it.