So colleagues, I’ll try to reanimate the topic a bit and rehabilitate Jingo.
First, once again I want to draw attention to the fact that I do not like in many statements of some forum participants.
For example, this:
Denis, hello !!
Do not pay attention
: roll: ... Promote all the topics raised by the "Jingo colleague" ... You will see a bunch of inconsistencies and understand everything: P : D ...
Roma, why do you have to give a partial hint of partial penumbra to a person whom you know only by his, maybe, not always, from your point of view, connected and logical statements?
Now, what I wanted to write about:
I was interested in the approach, Jingo to the problem that he wanted to solve. I wanted to meet and maybe help the person in some way.
So, today we went around with all the office centers that own cameras that have a chance to shoot a villain (it’s good that Sokolniki is not far from my office).
In fact, if the opera tore his ass off the chair and did it within 10 days after the theft, then everything could work out. Alexander (Jingo) analyzed everything quite competently, made calculations, went around everything with his legs and, in principle, correctly identified the cameras on which the villain should light up. Unfortunately, life is not so simple.
Cameras in Sokolniki Park were probably installed in the last century, of which only two work, which cannot help us. Further along the route, the information from the cameras that are of most interest to us is stored for only 10 days, but those cameras from which the information was saved are aimed at specific objects and catch passers-by only by chance.
Theoretically, with a combination of some factors, everything could have turned out, but unfortunately not this time.
Now, as for Alexander, a very young man with an analytical mind and a great desire to solve his own task.
In general, I liked Alexander, we exchanged business cards and maybe we can find common ground on the job.
For now, you have to run.
Original message
