Spying on her husband. Outdoor surveillance.

[Роберт]

And we did it like that - stuck out stupidly at the address, and when the defendant rushed for a beer in the morning or vodka for dinner, they informed the customer ... He called the police, they say, children at home, and there the booze, the police called the inspector PDN, he drew up a protocol. ..
In 2 weeks - 3 protocols, plus old protocols raised, booze in public places, as a result - the court decided in favor of our client, despite the cool characteristics and other garbage provided to the court by the person involved!
This is one thing ...
In another case, collecting negativity in relation to mother (and she is not a drunkard at all, occupies a good position in the district administration) and her roommate, brought exactly the same result - the daughter is now with her father, he is raising her!

So, I disagree categorically and unequivocally with the statement of Andrei Valerievich !!! : lol:
The court takes into account ALL circumstances and facts! And drinking one of the parents is more than a serious factor!

Very correct tactics.

 

[Роберт]

I can only say to Yevgeny Kraev that there is a likelihood of a different judge’s behavior. Will not accept and all. Then what will you say to the client? After all, the problem is not in observation as such, but as a result. And the result should be the one that the client expects. I understand the work of the detective.

 

[Евгений СБ]

I can only say to Yevgeny Kraev that there is a likelihood of a different judge’s behavior. Will not accept and all. Then what will you say to the client? After all, the problem is not in observation as such, but as a result. And the result should be the one that the client expects. I understand the work of the detective.

We give guarantees only in one place - in the morgue. Therefore, the client is warned in advance about everything. After which he makes his choice whether he needs it or not.

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

I can only say to Yevgeny Kraev that there is the likelihood of another judge behavior. Will not accept and all. Then what will you say to the client ? After all, the problem is not in observation as such, but as a result. And the result should be the one that the client expects. I understand the work of the detective.

And the client is first explained that the detective is not responsible for the judicial decision
The detective is responsible for the qualitatively collected material: D

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

We give guarantees only in one place - in the morgue. Therefore, the client is warned in advance about everything. After which he makes his choice whether he needs it or not.

Zhenya!
This institution also has no guarantees ...
There were cases - they mixed up the dead

 

[Роберт]

And there were people who put living people in the morgue: D: D

 

[Евгений СБ]

We give guarantees only in one place - in the morgue. Therefore, the client is warned in advance about everything. After which he makes his choice whether he needs it or not.

Zhenya!
This institution also has no guarantees ...
There were cases - they mixed up the dead

I mean that a person is either alive or not.

 

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

I can only say to Yevgeny Kraev that there is a likelihood of a different judge’s behavior. Will not accept and all. Then what will you say to the client? After all, the problem is not in observation as such, but as a result. And the result should be the one that the client expects. I understand the work of the detective.

We give guarantees only in one place - in the morgue. Therefore, the client is warned in advance about everything. After which he makes his choice whether he needs it or not.

Zhenya, absolutely right !!!

 

[ДНК]

I can only say to Yevgeny Kraev that there is a likelihood of a different judge’s behavior. Will not accept and all. Then what will you say to the client? After all, the problem is not in observation as such, but as a result. And the result should be the one that the client expects. I understand the work of the detective.

Even I have some kind of vague impression that you do not correctly represent the work of the detective .... maybe I'm wrong ...

 

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

I can only say to Yevgeny Kraev that there is the likelihood of another judge behavior. Will not accept and all. Then what will you say to the client ? After all, the problem is not in observation as such, but as a result. And the result should be the one that the client expects. I understand the work of the detective.

And the client is first explained that the detective is not responsible for the judicial decision
The detective is responsible for the qualitatively collected material: D

Definitely!