Brain training

[Татьяна 49]

For the sake of interest, I'll ask a psychologist tomorrow. But, in my opinion, is it possible not to love your good grandfathers, father, sons, nephews, friends? Yes, and yourself, your beloved.

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

Tatyan, a woman is easier to answer this question

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

Strange girl. Women are generally strange creatures, but in this case, tin:!:
I don’t understand the test system at all, or rather the principle. The same IQ, people with a mathematical mindset pass this test with a bang, although in life: ugeek:, humanities do not gain more than 90%.
"playing chess well does not mean being the smartest"

 

[Бюро Рысь]

"playing chess well does not mean being the smartest"

I agree

When the PFL took place for the first time, I remembered one question: “Do you like men”, respectively, the answer is “yes” or “no”. I love it means that something is wrong with you, I don’t like it, but I’m a man myself ... I still don’t know how to answer: D

In what year were you asked this question? AT DIFFERENT TIMES THE CONCEPT TO LOVE A MAN was UNDERSTANDED FOR DIFFERENTLY. Previously, I would answer YES, since the concept of default was invested in this word, as Tatyana said

But, in my opinion, how can you not love your good grandfathers, father, sons, nephews, friends? Yes, and yourself, beloved.

And now I’ll answer NO, because by will and will, our time has made adjustments to this concept and now by default there is a completely different essence in the question (I think everyone understood which one)

 

[Татьяна 49]

Vitaliy amused me today. Well, okay, since I’m in a smoking room, we’ll have a smoke. The answer of the psychologist is the PFL test, especially for the Ministry of Internal Affairs, likely , implied homosexual "love." Therefore, for a normal man, in this context, the correct answer " NOT! .... practical.
So guys, you're right, no matter how terrible, the corrections of our time are tough.

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

Tatyan, the test took place for the first time in 1991. I’m not sure that the adjustments were made, the test was more likely a sample of the USSR.

 

[Татьяна 49]

Oh, Vitaliy! I absolutely know from the stories, the person I trust, back in 1968-1969 the raid of the operet detachment was held in the hostel of MPEI to detain the guy who persuaded the young guys to cohabit, though they didn’t manage to catch him on the “hot” one. a group of teaching staff was detained in the Smolensk branch of MPEI (one was the head of the department), forcing students to contact for grades and under threat of expulsion. And this was a harsh article then! So, it is logical to assume that these tests were introduced in Soviet times questions about sexual preferences. Surovo and bluntly. Now psychologists conjure with color pictures, blots, and seemingly meaningless questions. And in 1991, directly YES or NO

 

[Частный детектив Самара.]

I agree with you. Until 1997, they worked according to the old code, but we no longer had such tasks.

 

[Татьяна 49]

Well, I really want the following task, but so far no one has put forward any versions.
I must say right away that the quality of the pictures is below average ...
In order to carry a forbidden cargo, a passenger must look and behave naturally
1. the passenger immediately disappears, he attracted a customs officer, with almost no luggage, one brush.
2. a woman, hypothetically can hide something in her stockings and that's it, but in the task it is said that two reasons to suspect, then it disappears
3.We will deal with the third one. A hat that can be put on the customs officer’s hand, but not on the head (maybe a souvenir or gift is not a fact) Oh, shoes that are clearly not paired, even in this picture. It’s difficult to see if a towel whether it’s a piece of material, or a patch pattern, or really. It’s a very strange set, similar to filling and simulating luggage. So what about the suitcase? There seems to be a second reason to suspect, as I understand it, the first is a meaningless set of luggage, and the second, it seems that the top cover has a double bottom, judging by the figure. Well, something like that.

 

[Бюро Рысь]

I must say right away that the quality of the pictures is below average ...

Unfortunately, I did not find a better picture.

3.We will deal with the third one. A hat that can be put on the customs officer’s hand, but not on the head (maybe a souvenir or gift is not a fact) Oh, shoes that are clearly not paired, even in this picture. It’s difficult to see if a towel whether it’s a piece of material, or a patch pattern, or really. It’s a very strange set, similar to filling and simulating luggage. So what about the suitcase? There seems to be a second reason to suspect, as I understand it, the first is a meaningless set of luggage, and the second, it seems that the top cover has a double bottom, judging by the figure. Well, something like that.

Absolutely correct answer, however, as always! BRAVO! : D