Theme for discussion ...

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Today I’ll try to transfer the topic to open access.
To publish a blog article with Dmitry Galochkin inviting him to read what real detectives think.

I would then even strengthen: OUR instant, concrete and inevitable answer!

 

[Запаренко Александр Николаевич]

LONG SRO, everyone to go ... the forest. I suggest holding an anti-CPA company. Kozly (I apologize to colleagues for expressions in society)

 

[Victor]

Hello comrades!

not going to chip about the separation of the detective idea.

the thing is (my opinion)

that we, dear colleagues, are not the perpetrators of the law,

just citizens, with special rights, who can, for their resources, with given given opportunities, do Good, with the possible benefit for themselves.

 

[Victor]

in fact revolutionary premises)))))

 

[Victor]

and yet, the noise here on the board, constant,

but in reality, there are twice as many references, money for implementation,

but

there are no less crimes

citizens are less deprived of their will,

and indeed, there is no positive dynamics.

current advertising.

sorry if what.

and further,

no need to seize power if you can’t curb crime.

 

[Victor]

pure for laughter, I converted the previous post into English (on Google), and then into Russian, and what happened ?? )) read:

and more noise here on board, constant,

and indeed refer to twice as much money for sales

but

crimes have not decreased

don't deprive citizens less will

and in fact, there is no positive trend.

current ad.

sorry if what.

and further

You do not have to seize power, if not mogesh to curb crime.

 

[Victor]

so))

 

[Щербенёв Алексей Григорьевич]

Dear Colleagues! I certainly hear you. Unfortunately, only 2-3 people take part in the discussion of SROs. I consider it inappropriate to send this correspondence to Galochkin. This is a conversation in the “carriage compartment” and it is unlikely to react to it. Yes, Galochkin has nothing to do with it. he and Lyubimenko - the flag in his hands. The ARD already has a position in relation to the self-regulatory organization. We are ready to present this position on the pages of the magazine “Security World.” Andrei Nikolaevich, I gave the coordinates of Valery Kollosovich Znikin (tel. + 7903-946-48-80) preparing the material for the journal. I think it will be correct if the opinion of the MOD is expressed in this article. The magazine is readable, incl. and detectives who are not part of our organizations.

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Thank you, Alexei Grigoryevich, for responding.
So, we will correspond with the magazine Galochkina and Lyubimenko ...
Long live the controversy in the specialized media!
Is this our OUR instant, concrete and inevitable answer?

 

[Группа К]

Of course, Gal will not “see the expediency”, even if the former head of the association cannot “flip” the branch back and see that there are 14 detectives who voted “against” SRO, not 2-3.
Probably for you the opinion of fourteen "not authority". Well, I'm not competent and illiterate in security matters. But here are the remaining 13 (Thirteen !!:!: !!) private practicing detectives - why can't you see point blank?

This is the reason for all the troubles that fell on the head of detectives. Because of the shortsightedness and unwillingness to take into account the opinion of colleagues.

"Stop swinging the carriage compartment!" - (C): lol: