Детектив-Молдова schrieb:
DETEGO, in your report MANY abstracts!
I have a few questions for you.
1. What sources were you inspired from?
2. Is this purely your vision or are you succumbing to it as an IDEA OF ALL DETECTIVES?
3. Who else apart from you shares them, what detective communities of Russia are international?
For me, a lot of utopian ...
And this position is generally "DEAD"!
It is clear that among the operating operatives, investigators and inquiry and other state bodies there are many qualified specialists who could also claim the title of detective. However, in our opinion , a quarantine period should be introduced for such candidates: between work in law enforcement agencies and assignment of detective status they should work for at least two years as an assistant detective or conduct private legal practice. This “quarantine” is necessary to nullify the “professional deformation” of a former opera or investigator who became a detective.
In your opinion, only purely civilian persons can become true detectives, without having "been smeared" with work in government agencies.
Following this logic, it is impossible to give licenses for advocacy to former prosecutors, judges, law enforcement officials ...
Enter QUARANTINE for them too!
Also, prohibit former doctors of MH hospitals from engaging in private practice, working in private clinics - in quarantine!
Of course, all of the above is my opinion, and in a very shortened version. None of the Russian detectives have yet supported me, but I hope for constructive criticism of my colleagues, if only for the reasons that the existing model of interaction between the detective and society has completely exhausted itself. Maybe someone is happy with the innovations that famous people offer. But their projects do not suit me, because I am a detective practitioner with 14 years of experience, and not a theorist (although I have something to brag about in science).
I regularly pay taxes, this year I gave the state a little more than 400 thousand rubles, and therefore I think that I have the right to demand more. More orders from the state, more interaction with lawyers, less taxes, I would like to have guarantees of inviolability (immunity) for myself and my family, I would like to have quick and guaranteed access to departmental bases, I would like to be a counterbalance to the investigator in a criminal court, and also The court collected the information that I collected to the case as evidence .. I would like a lot more. But as Andrei Zakharov rightly noted, few people are interested in the methods and practices of detectives with a license.
In my opinion, the lack of interest in private forensic techniques is primarily due to the fact that some of the detectives who came to the profession from the investigation think and work differently than "civilian" ones. In fact, the former investigator, having received the detective’s crust, immediately goes “into the shadows”. Well, he does not know how otherwise, and does not seek to tell the truth. Civil detectives, however, do not know how to work as investigators, so they use the methods of lawyers, which makes their work transparent, and the information collected is suitable for proof. If I'm wrong, correct me. But since we have a constitutional right to work, the situation with the admission to the detective work of a former investigator and civilian needs to be aligned, reduced to a common denominator.
Therefore, I propose the need to introduce “quarantine” for former investigators, prosecutors and interrogators. Once again, I note the main idea. I proceeded from the fact that a former operational employee is not able to work as detectives work. But he still had contacts with former colleagues, which the new licensee will definitely use to gain access to departmental bases. This is a harmful approach, since it contradicts the basic and main principle of detective activity - legality. Without collecting information legally, the detective does not get the right to use it in his report, I am silent about submitting illegal information collected by the detective to court.
I am also a supporter of the theory that detective methods for collecting and analyzing information should not have anything to do with operational methods. I am aware that they are throwing stones at me now, but ... did any of the detectives carry out ORM?
No, of course, because the law on the ARD prohibits this directly. From here follows another conclusion. The detective has no right in the report to write that he carried out the "inspection", since the inspection is an ORM)) But these are the details, I left my arguments a little to the side ...
I understand that two years for authorization is a form of fiction and nonsense in order for the former investigator to abandon the habit of calling the TsAB ZITS, etc., etc. or trying to persuade his former colleague to “help” him with collecting information while pushing him to commit an official crime .
For major cardinal shifts, a set of measures is needed, a new concept of development. And only then - the new Law. In the meantime, it pains me to watch people who have never, I repeat, never conducted a single private investigation from the beginning - as the old law requires - and to the end - these people are tearing the old and offering in return harmful to me or other detectives initiative.
These people, if anyone has not yet seen - offer the most important evil for detectives - to refuse licensing. Thus, anyone can call himself a detective. Why is this done? I don’t know, but I can assume that any person or "detective agency" could freely and without restrictions participate in public procurement, the subject of which will be checking the business reliability of counterparties. This procurement market is exclusively "detective" and very monetary.
Not going to write for so long, probably affected by "hunger." For a long time, for objective reasons, did not appear here. But how it happened, it happened. I will be happy to answer additional questions from colleagues.
Original message
