The IAPD Representative is a licensed detective.

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

At the IAPD office, a working meeting was held between IAPD President Andrey Matushkin and Full Member Viktor Kravets.
The meeting resulted in a collaboration agreement between a licensed detective and IAPD.
Kravets Viktor Vasilievich will provide detective services in accordance with the Law of the Russian Federation on private detective and security activities, representing the interests of IAPD.

 

[Плотников Юрий Михайлович]

Greetings!

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Now will all private Partnership detectives enter into similar agreements?

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Now will all private Partnership detectives enter into similar agreements?

Not...
Not all...

 

[Запаренко Александр Николаевич]

And the meaning of concluding a contract?

 

[Детективное агентство Псков]

Yes, really, what's the point. Just wondering.

 

[Детектив-Молдова]

 Kravets Viktor Vasilievich will provide detective services in accordance with the Law of the Russian Federation on private detective and security activities, representing the interests of IAPD.

MOU is a Nonprofit Partnership, how will detective services be provided, representing the interests of MOU? Or is it for foreign spies, so as not to guess: lol:

 

[Гудимов Анатолий Геннадиевич]

Non-commercial partnerships can carry out entrepreneurial activity only to achieve the goals for which it was created (Clause 2, Article 24 of Federal Law N 7-ФЗ). Income and expenses on entrepreneurial activity are accounted for separately (paragraph 3 of article 24 of the Federal law N 7-ФЗ).
The Partnership has a lot of expenses ahead of the conference and development, so that the possible income from detective work will not be superfluous. : D

 

[Детектив-Молдова]

Non-commercial partnerships can carry out entrepreneurial activity only to achieve the goals for which it was created (Clause 2, Article 24 of Federal Law N 7-ФЗ). Income and expenses on entrepreneurial activity are accounted for separately (paragraph 3 of article 24 of the Federal law N 7-ФЗ).
The Partnership has a lot of expenses ahead of the conference and development, so that the possible income from detective work will not be superfluous. : D

We are only FOR.
Only so that the tax authorities do not have questions, and so - ON GOOD WAY!

 

[Андрей Захаров]

In principle, in order to avoid any misunderstandings with the tax authorities and “misunderstandings” during the implementation of the NPV, under the agreement between the private detective and the NP, it is possible to work according to the following option.
NP, realizing the capabilities of its information resources in accordance with the Charter (clause 2.2), carries out activities to develop the market of detective services, as well as providing consumers with them, which will be expressed in the selection of potential customers who need licensed BH services. Received orders are forwarded to a specific BH which, concluding an appropriate contract for the provision of services, executes an order, receives an appropriate fee from the client and transfers part of this fee as a “voluntary donation” to the account of a non-commercial partnership (in accordance with clause 6.6 of the Charter). However, it is not possible to oblige the IP-licensed BH in accordance with any agreements or contracts to transfer these funds specifically as “voluntary donations.” When such a contract is concluded, the contract will be considered void due to the fact that the transfer of such “donations” implies precisely voluntariness of their contribution. Thus, by concluding agreements on cooperation with a particular BH, in such agreements it is possible to stipulate only the fact of non-repayable transfer by the NP of a particular BH to information about persons who need to provide BH services. In this case, the payment of any black money by this BH to the NP account will be possible only in the form of a “voluntary donation”, which does not guarantee the fact of its payment. However, this scheme, in the presence of a trusting relationship between NP and BH, is quite possible and acceptable.
On the issue of paying taxes, when implementing this scheme, there are also no questions if BH uses STS.
Other forms of cooperation between the NP and a specific IP-BH for profit generation will probably be quite troublesome ... But this is only a personal opinion ...