Loner or team? ...

[Детективное бюро Бориса Турецкого]

Good afternoon, comrades!
Recently I came across an article by a detective who claims that a private investigation is only for singles. I still can’t say for sure, since there is little more experience and nothing to compare with, but so far I am of the opinion that it is impossible to be a specialist in all areas that are involved in detective work, and services are multifaceted and require an integrated approach. According to the law, it is clear that only IP is possible in Russia, but that’s not the point, it doesn’t bother anyone to organize a partnership if they wish ...
How do you think? As your experience shows, dear fellow detectives? Does Holmes need Watson ??) ...
Thank!

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

For example, I am a team man ...

 

[private detective in Tbilisi]

Of course, the team is more effective.

 

[JR Security Consulting Group]

It depends solely on a person’s personal psychotype, character traits, etc. You can work as a large team on a project. You can work alone and attract colleagues and assistants. The result will be both there and there. In general, as you are more comfortable yourself, so do it.

 

[Марат]

It all depends on the task set by the client. If this is a report or analytical report on physical. or legal face, this is one. The implementation of the search, events using special equipment, carrying out NN - is completely different. Here it will be much more difficult for one to cope, and the result may be an order of magnitude lower. In such cases, it is better to attract assistants.

 

[Арсен]

It all depends on the task set by the client. If this is a report or analytical report on physical. or legal face, this is one. The implementation of the search, events using special equipment, carrying out NN - is completely different. Here it will be much more difficult for one to cope, and the result may be an order of magnitude lower. In such cases, it is better to attract assistants.

I support !!!

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

In any activity, its main parameter, as a rule, is efficiency, i.e. indicator characterizing its effectiveness.
It is more convenient for someone to carry out a search alone, for others - as a hert, i.e. collectively.
After all, the main thing is the result of activity, no matter what we say there about its process.
At our Forum, from time to time, this crucial issue was raised and discussed by a prominent theoretician and practitioner of private investigation from Moscow - Oleg Zimin (CALL).
The main argument of Oleg, as far as I recall, was the postulate: PRIVATE SEARCH CAN NOT BE TAKEN INTO A COLLECTIVE DEFINITION.
In this regard, I recall the heated discussions of my youth: CONTRAST EXPLORATION IS A SCIENCE OR ARTS? : oops:

At our Forum, a collective approach to solving professional problems is traditionally welcomed, however, I have not heard that someone condemned the activities of an individual detective.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
If someone is interested in my opinion, then I’m working collectively, and getting paid is strictly individual ...: D

 

[Виталий Климин]

Sometimes helpers are needed. But we must try to take on what you are a pro !!!! For any detective, professional credibility is much more important !!!

 

[Андрей Захаров]

I fully agree with Vitaliy ....

 

[Симферополь]

How do you think? As your experience shows, dear fellow detectives? Does Holmes need Watson ??) ...

Do not forget about Mrs. Hudson - for individual tasks! )))