Speech by Professor Arkhipov Mikhail Vadimovich.

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Speech by Professor Arkhipov Mikhail Vadimovich.

Good afternoon, comrades. With your permission, I will speak from the floor.

I recently returned from a conference called "Food Security. Food Security." And what problems have arisen in connection with this that need to be addressed. First of all, this is import - substitution and import - an addition you yourself understand, in connection with which these measures are carried out.

Secondly, this is a huge amount of counterfeit goods in the market of goods, which increased with the advent of the import - substitution format. Because if earlier there were high-quality products and medium quality, now, as part of the substitution, the quality of the products leaves much to be desired.

And generally speaking, human security, personal security, which is associated with its functioning in society.

And at the conference, among other things, the question was raised: "Did everyone present have breakfast? And did everyone have breakfast with domestic products?" What the conference participants could not answer. But everyone had breakfast. This means that there is still enough food. There are questions whether it is possible or impossible to supply products from abroad, through what channels they are supplied, and so on ... Large food companies today have captured the market for raw materials. And they put us on an imported needle. Giving the right to import raw materials from the West is the same as giving NATO forces to guard the borders of Russia. All the same, our agribusiness is behaving appropriately. The state has moved away from the concept of quality, which is why now there is falsification everywhere in the market. What is safety and quality? We ate and stayed alive. And what did you eat, good or not, good or bad ... Therefore, I am opposed to import substitution because you and I cannot grow coffee, cocoa, tea in the Russian Federation, there are a number of products and we don’t have to talk about import substitution , as a friend said "they have something with their heads." How often it is possible to produce something if we don’t have seeds, an ill-conceived policy, it leads to the fact that there are no seeds, you can’t get them ... And generally speaking, if there is no food security and we don’t have food, this is quite simply, the closure of the channels ... and that means talk about personal security, citizen security are declarative in nature.

And with this question, before the conference, I went to some experts who told me that they were completely defenseless from the Chinese diaspora, who conduct excursions in the Hermitage. They are being squeezed out, they have their own finances, their own buses, their own transport. And what do they tell, their Chinese guides, that all these riches have been stolen and soon it will all become ours. Of course, this can be treated in different ways, but all this adversely affects the image and market of our state.

Therefore, it would be great for us to think through issues related to food safety. Because I call all this the preservation of the nation and, in general, the preservation of our moral capital, because Russia, unlike Europe or America, is still a spiritual country. Our country lives at the expense of enthusiasts, in Russia, by and large, there are only optimists on whom everything rests. I was asked, here is Mikhail Vadimovich, how to raise agriculture now? To which I replied, I replied like this: "Create a Cheka for the agro-industrial complex." Because a person does not feel his security of utility ...

International Association of Private Detectives

 

[Группа К]

The professor is right. A fake food (and not only) has filled the Russian market. And in general, this is natural, because the market does not tolerate emptiness. If there is a demand, an offer will appear. The fact that there was a demand for domestic cheeses and milk is not bad. But manufacturers of top-priority strategic products squeeze their full benefit even here, offering the consumer instead of milk chalk or lime, instead of bread - cement or some other kind of bio fudge, etc. One gets the impression that some enemies of the people are engaged in lobbying the food embargo, otherwise how can one explain the regular destruction of high-quality imported products on the one hand and the production of counterfeit goods on the other?

There is no half measure. Either tighten the screws to failure, as in the USSR, or vacate your posts and go to work in the national economy, since you cannot predict the behavior of the market more than two steps forward.