How to file a lawsuit

[частный детектив София]

Hello! I heard that you can file a lawsuit with an identity card. The fact is that a person who has offended me and even blackmails is the owner of the website. This internet site is completely anonymous. Through the bodies - nobody wants to attract him! So I thought that if you can sue like that, then the judge will decide and oblige the bodies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs to find the owner of this site and deliver it to the courtroom.

 

[Адвокат]

Hello Irina.
Cases related to violations in the field of computer technology do not like to be considered not only by law enforcement agencies, but also by the courts. This is due to the very complex process of proof, as a rule, which does not lead to a positive result.
There are no completely anonymous sites. As a rule, you can find under which computer it was created.
So, you write that the owner of the website violates your rights.
To place a page (site) on the Internet, you need to find a place for it. On the Internet, such places on their servers are provided by special services - hosters. Each server has its own unique digital address.
Hosts are paid and free. Free hosters have virtually no obligations to their users and may refuse the user to provide their services. Also, free hosters do not provide a number of features (for example: install your guestbook, voting, forum, chat and other scripts) that can be used by customers of paid hosters. Free hosting providers can impose a number of restrictions (a small space for the site) and encumbrances (require the placement of ads (banners) on the user's page).
A domain name is the address of a site at which Internet users using search robots will find a specific site. As a rule, domains are divided into three levels. Each country is allocated a 2-3-letter code mark — a first-level domain or domain of that country. For example, .ru is Russia, ua is Ukraine.
There are several first-level domains associated not with geography, but with the site’s focus - for example, .com for commercial, .org for non-profit, .edu for educational organizations. The first level domain is also called the "zone".
On a second-level domain, any user can create as many third-level domains as they want, which free hosters do.
The registration of domains in Russia is carried out by RosNIIROS.
Sometimes, paid hosters offer domain registration for their future user. In this case, they still turn to RIPN and register the domain not for the user, but for themselves. This is done so that the user then could not leave them to another hoster in case of poor-quality service.
Therefore, conscientious users register a domain in their name.
In case of non-payment for a domain in RosNIIROS, the domain is canceled.
To place a page on the site of a paid hoster, as a rule, it is necessary to personally attend the user to conclude a contract, as well as pay for his services. The Internet has a list of paid and free hosters, it is easy to find.
Files are uploaded to the hoster website:
- through the host’s web page, for which the user must log in (log in) to the control center of his page on the host’s website by entering his login and password in a special form;
- using a special program, provided that the hoster provides such an opportunity.

Users on the Internet leave a lot of traces by which you can track which sites he visited, which messages he left. However, these are traces of not a specific person, but just a computer with a personal number, which can be changed if desired. It is possible to carry out work aimed at establishing from which physical address the user accessed the Internet, but this address may turn out to be a rented office, apartment, hotel, Internet cafe, Internet club. Modern technologies allow you to access the Internet using a mobile phone (which are not always registered as a true user), using Wi-Fi, Yota, etc.
There will be insufficient evidence for the court that the message that violated your rights was sent from a specific computer, it is also necessary to prove that a specific person used this computer at the time of sending the message.
In order to bring a person to criminal or civil liability, it is necessary to collect evidence that it was Ivan Ivanov, and not any other person, who violated your rights.
Based on the foregoing, you will need to contact the organization that provides expert services in the field of high technology with a request for an expert study, the purpose of which is to identify a user who posted messages on the Internet that violated your rights. After receiving a positive expert opinion, you will be able to go to court with a request to bring a specific person to justice.
According to civil procedure legislation, the examination is carried out at the expense of the parties to the process. Those. You will have to pay it at your own expense. And in the event that the court subsequently satisfies your requirements for bringing the perpetrator to justice, the amount spent can be recovered from the Respondent.

Given the above, you can assess how laborious and financially expensive the search for the guilty person. In addition, this search may lead you to a dead end. You will find that the site is registered on a person who did not even suspect about it, a computer installed in Thailand was used to access the Internet, and Internet access was via Wi-Fi in various Internet cafes. In this case, all your efforts will be wasted.

Given the above, before you begin this process, you need to weigh your strength, time and financial capabilities. After which, you, perhaps, will conclude for yourself that "the game is not worth the candle."

To stop the further distribution of messages that violate your rights, you need to contact the hoster on whose server the site is located, stating that such and such a user violates your rights, indicating what this violation is.
How to find a hostrera Specialists in the field of computer technology can help you.

 

[частный детектив София]

Hello. Thanks for the answer.
With your permission, I will clarify that in the end I can help us.
So, this site is called orabote.net
See for yourself (through the who is system) how skillfully blackmailers disguise themselves.
Understanding that this is superfluous work for you (as they say, "someone else's pain is not your own pain"), I offer you payment for a positive search result for your blackmailer!
It will also help you that the owner of this site, on behalf of the "administration" of this site, is blackmailing me directly. The information is straightforward and comes from the first person. And I already wrote to this person a thousand times (copies are available), to which he did not react at all. This is more than enough for the court!

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Lawyer, thanks. A very comprehensive answer. I read and enjoyed it. (I read all your answers to the questions, everyone is in an excellent style, interesting and informative. Thank you for your help in developing the forum!) + 3!
You have been working on the forum for a relatively long time, can you introduce yourself?
With deepest respect, Matushkin Andrey.

 

[Адвокат]

An article posted on the site you are writing about only confirms my words:
"experts advise adhering to the three basic rules of conducting discussions in the Internet space: do not make excuses, do not insult your opponent and do not allow emotions to prevail. After all, as you know, the one who is right and the calmer is the winner in the dispute."
As for the search for the blackmailer, you can write to me in PM.

 

[Адвокат]

An example of a statement of claim to the site administrator:

Simonovsky District Court of Moscow

ISTETS: Lawyer of the Moscow College of Lawyers "________________"
F ____________ From _________ To __________
Mailing address: _____________________________
Tel .: ____________________
RESPONSE: Odnoklassniki Limited Liability Company
Address: 115114, Moscow, Derbenevskaya nab., D. 7, p. 17, floor 3, apt. I
State duty: 100 rubles

SUGGESTED STATEMENT

I, F ______ C.V. (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”), on August 10, 2008, while studying the information on the website “www.odnoklassniki.ru”, I found that in the comments on my photo posted on the specified site, a certain person named “Elena Ivanova” posted her comment as follows: “Do the Russians want war? Want Bitches !!!!!!!!! " (hereinafter Comment). The owner of the domain name www.odnoklassniki.ru, as well as the person who is the host provider (the host provider provides users with free disk space for the information, as well as provides technical support services for the site) and the administrator of this site is Odnoklassniki LLC ( Further Defendant).
The availability of a Comment on the site is confirmed by the Protocol for the inspection of information on an information resource on the Internet, compiled on 12.08.08 by a notary M ________ vym OV (copy attached).
This comment is offensive in nature, defames my honor, dignity and business reputation as a lawyer and a Russian person, the disseminated information is untrue. Claimant's position is based on the following:
1.August 08, 2008 The Russian Federation, in response to the facts of the military destruction and genocide of the citizens of South Ossetia by the Government of Georgia, as well as the execution of Russian citizens from among the peacekeeping contingent by the Georgian military, conducted an operation to force Georgia to peace, as a result of which the physical destruction of the Ossetian people was stopped, the troops Georgia left the zone of responsibility of the Russian peacekeeping contingent in South Ossetia. In this situation, a Comment was posted on the Internet site belonging to the Respondent, from which it follows that the Russians launched the military actions in connection with their desire to participate in the hostilities, and not in connection with the facts of the genocide of the peoples of South Ossetia and the execution of Russian peacekeepers, which is obviously not true.
2. Defamatory information was posted on the website "www.odnoklassniki.ru" as a comment on my photo, i.e. Comments were addressed to me personally. I do not agree with the statements made in the Commentary; I believe that they offend my sense of national pride in my country and my people. These statements caused me moral harm, because, after reading the Commentary, I was worried about the unjust indiscriminate accusation of the adherence of all Russians, including me, to the war. My feelings were further aggravated by the realization that at the moment when the Russian soldiers were giving their lives to restore peace and stop the extermination of the Ossetian people, the authors and distributors of the Commentary argued that Russian soldiers were dying because of the Russian tendency to war, not connection with the performance by them of the professional and moral duty of a Russian soldier.
3. Responsibility for reporting defamatory and inaccurate information occurs for their dissemination. Distribution means: “Report, make known to many, spread the word. Spread the word. Spread the News ”- Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language: in 4t. Ed. D.N. Ushakova. In relation to the case under consideration, the mechanics of the distribution of this Comment were as follows:
- an unidentified person, having registered on the website “www.odnoklassniki.ru” as “Elena Ivanova”, has received the right from the Respondent, including to post comments on the website;
- the Respondent, having registered the specified unidentified person, provided its free disk space for posting the above Comment;
- The defendant, being the host provider, technically provided an opportunity for an unidentified person: to post a comment on the site; send a Comment to any persons also registered on this site, without the consent of the users of the site, including the Claimant; save the Comment in the site’s memory, which provides the ability to repeatedly read the comment by an unlimited number of site users.
Without the permission of the Respondent (without registering on the site) and without technical support by the Respondent of the site's activities, the author of the Comment would not have been able to distribute his Comment for review by an unlimited number of persons - users of the site “www.odnoklassniki.ru”.
4. The fault of the author of the Commentary in the dissemination of defamatory and inaccurate information consists in the deliberate communication of the specified information by posting his Commentary on the site.
The Defendant’s fault consists in inaction, expressed in failure to take measures to establish a person who leaves his comments on the site, as well as in failure to follow up on such messages and block them (removal from the network). The defendant created and maintains such a system of the site, in which any person, having provided any, including false, information about his name and surname, gets the right to disseminate any information: false, offensive, deceitful. At the same time, a person whose right to disseminate the above information will be violated cannot even find out the surname, name, patronymic and residence address of the person who caused the harm, i.e. will not be able to hold the indicated person liable, since an essential condition for filing a statement of claim to the court is the indication of the exact name, surname and patronymic, as well as the place of residence of the defendant. The established practice of providing host providers with the right to access the site without preliminary registration according to reliable documents (passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation) does not comply with the legislation of the Russian Federation insofar as it allows for inaccurate registration (no passport details of the person are established during registration), as a result of which the person whose right is violated , cannot use his constitutional right to judicial protection, which contradicts Part 1 of Art. 45 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation (“State protection of human and civil rights and freedoms in the Russian Federation is guaranteed”), part 1 of article 46 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation (“Everyone is guaranteed judicial protection of their rights and freedoms”) and article 12 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
In accordance with article 23 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, everyone has the right to protection of his honor and good name.
According to the norms of Art. 2 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, a person, his rights and freedoms are the highest value, the protection of the rights and freedoms of man and citizen is the duty of the state.
In accordance with the provisions of Art. 152 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the honor, dignity and business reputation of a citizen shall be protected by publishing a refutation of information that is defamatory and not relevant, compensation for losses and compensation for moral damage.
According to Part 2 of Art. 1080 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, persons who jointly caused harm shall be liable jointly and severally to the victims
According to the norms of Art. 151 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, if a citizen has suffered non-pecuniary damage by actions violating his personal non-property rights or encroaching on other intangible goods belonging to the citizen, the court may impose on the offender the obligation of monetary compensation for the specified damage. The plaintiff considers that the amount of compensation for violation of his honor and dignity is 50,000 rubles.
The plaintiff’s position is also confirmed by the established judicial practice:
In accordance with paragraph 4 of the Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 3 dated 02.24.05 “On judicial practice in cases of protecting the honor and dignity of citizens, as well as the business reputation of citizens and legal entities” (hereinafter Resolution No. 3), everyone's right to judicial protection of honor , dignity and business reputation from disseminating defamatory information that is not true, is a necessary restriction on freedom of speech and the media for cases of abuse of these rights.
According to paragraph 3 of paragraph 2 of Resolution No. 3, judicial protection of honor, dignity and business reputation is not excluded in cases where it is not possible to identify a person who disseminates defamatory or inaccurate information (for example, when disseminating information on the Internet by a person who cannot be identified).
According to paragraph 1 of paragraph 5 of Resolution No. 3, the appropriate defendants in claims for protection of honor, dignity and business reputation are the authors of defamatory information that does not correspond to reality, as well as the persons who disseminated this information.
In accordance with paragraph 2 of paragraph 7 of Decree No. 3, the dissemination of information defaming the honor and dignity of citizens ... should be understood as publishing such information in print, broadcast on radio and television, demonstration in newsreels and other media, dissemination on the Internet.
Based on the foregoing, Art. 2, 23, 45, 46 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, Art. 12, 151, 152, 1080 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation,
I BEG:
1. Recognize the information circulated in the comments on the photo of Zh. _________ S.V. posted on the website “www.odnoklassniki.ru”, namely: “Do they want the Russian wars? Want Bitches !!!!!!!!! ", not true.
2. To oblige the Respondent to delete comments on the photo of Zh. _______ S.V. posted on the website “www.odnoklassniki.ru”, namely: “Do the Russians want wars? They Want Bitches !!!!!!!!!
3. To oblige the Respondent to pay compensation for the distribution of those discrediting the honor and dignity of Zh _________ C.V. information in the amount of 50,000 (fifty thousand) rubles.
4. The legal costs of paying the state fee and notarial expenses shall be assigned to the Respondent.
ATTACHMENT:
1. A copy of the protocol for the inspection of information posted on the Internet site, compiled by a notary of Moscow M ________ vym OV from 08/12/08
2. Application on 1 page
3. Receipt of payment of state duty.
4. A copy of the statement of claim for the Respondent.

F _______ C.V. _____________
"___" _____________ 2008

(Source: https://www.annexus.su/r_sud/odnok/isk)

 

[частный детектив София]

Defendant - not known!

Thanks again.

Quote: RESPONSE: Odnoklassniki Limited Liability Company
Address: 115114, Moscow, Derbenevskaya nab., D. 7, p. 17, floor 3, apt. I
State duty: 100 rubles

Who will accept such a statement from me, where the line of the respondent will be empty?
After all, the defendant is ANONYMOUS !?
This is the nail of the problem! [/ Color]

 

[Адвокат]

Another example of a claim for the protection of business reputation:

05/20/09 No. 1–6–6 / 218
In the Moscow Arbitration Court
115191, Moscow, st. Bolshaya Tula, possession 17.
Claimant:
All-Russian public organization
Russian Copyright Society
Location:
123995 Moscow, st. B. Bronnaya, d. 6 A, p. 1.
Defendants:
1. Closed Joint-Stock Company
“Regional Network Information Center” Location; 125315, Moscow, Leningradsky Prospekt, 74, building. 4.
2. Milanina M ____________ A ________ vna Residence: 19034
Moscow. ***
Gos. fee: 4,000 rubles, of which: - 4,000 rubles - for non-property requirements (based on paragraph 10 of the Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 20, 1999, No. 10).
Goodwill Claim
The All-Russian public organization “Russian Authors Society” (hereinafter also referred to as “Russian Authors Society” and “RAO”) is an organization for the management of rights on a collective basis in various areas of collective management.
From November 18, 2008 to March 11, 2009, the Internet www.antirao.ru was posted on the Internet, discrediting the business reputation of the Russian copyright society.
In accordance with paragraph 1 of Art. 152 of the Civil Code, paragraphs 7, 9 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 24.02.2005. No. 3 “On judicial practice in cases of protecting the honor and dignity of citizens, as well as the business reputation of citizens and legal entities)) (hereinafter - Resolution of the Plenum of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 3), the circumstances relevant to this category of cases are:
1. the fact that the defendant disseminated information about the plaintiff,
2. the defamatory nature of this information,
3. mismatch of their reality.
In this case, the plaintiff must prove the fact of dissemination of information by the person to whom the lawsuit is filed, as well as defaming the nature of this information. The responsibility to prove the conformity of the reality of the disseminated information lies with the defendant.
1. Regarding the fact of dissemination of information about the Claimant.
The fact of the dissemination of defamatory information by the person to whom the lawsuit is filed is confirmed by the attached protocol of inspection of the site www.resident.su/ru/antirao.html, compiled by the notary N. Totsky 03.03.2009g. in order to provide evidence (website www.resident.su/ru/antirao.html, contains information on the top-level domain zones RU and SU, including the owners of the sites).
The following data on the website www.antirao.ru are recorded in the specified protocol.
- owner: Marina A.Milanina
- phone: +7 ___________
- created: 04/07/2008
-Paid: 04/07/2009
- domain registrar: RUCEN-REG – RIPN
In accordance with paragraph 5 of the Decree of the RF Armed Forces No. 3, the appropriate defendants in claims for the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation are the authors of defamatory information that does not correspond to reality, as well as the persons who disseminated this information.
According to the Rules for the registration of domain names in the RU domain, approved by the Autonomous non-profit organization “Coordination Center for the National Internet Domain” (an organization that is the administrator of the RU top-level domain) (source: https://www.cctld.ru/ru/docs/archive_28 .php) (hereinafter referred to as “Domain Registration Rules”) a domain administrator is a user who administers a domain, i.e. determining the use of the domain; the user chooses the domain name on his own and is responsible for possible violations of the rights of third parties related to the selection and use of the domain name, and also bears the risk of losses associated with such violations.
According to paragraph 7 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the RF Armed Forces No. 3, the dissemination of information discrediting the honor and dignity of citizens or the business reputation of citizens and legal entities should be understood, including the dissemination of information on the Internet.
Thus, Milanina M _______ A _______ vna, as the administrator of the site www.antirao.ru, is the person who disseminated defamatory information about the Claimant posted on the specified site.
2. Concerning the discrediting nature of the information.
The following information discrediting the business reputation of the Claimant:
a) - domain name of the site www.antirao.ru
- words placed on the main and all other pages of this site: “AntiRAO.ru Music for shops and cafes to order”,
2.a. The domain name of the site www.antirao.ru contains two words made together in Latin letters: “anti” and “rao”.
That is, the words “anti” and “rao” are compared, logically and semantically identified in the domain name of the specified site, the word “rao” should be understood as the Russian copyright society. This conclusion follows from the content of the pages of this site, in particular, from the words located at the bottom of the main page of the site: “For any music that sounds in your restaurant (trading floor, store, etc.) you will have to make regular deductions to RAO "
Another domain name word “anti” has the following meaning:
- in the Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language S. I. Ozhegova, N. Yu. Shvedova, this word is defined as a prefix that forms nouns and adjectives with the meaning of opposites, hostility, orientation against whom, which is the same as unlawful ..., for example, anti-democratic, anti-artistic, anti-war, unsanitary, anti-people’s, anti-imperialist, anti-Soviet, anti-monopoly, anti-hero, anti-rocket, anti-icer, antioxidant.
- in the Dictionary of Russian synonyms and similarly meaningful expressions (author N. Abramov) This word is a derivational unit that forms adjectives with the value of a character, which is characterized by the opposite to the quality, called the motivating name by the adjective. The prefix “anti” contains the following synonyms: antibacterial, anti-enemy, anti-Hitler, anti-historical, anti-monarchical, anti-scientific, anti-social, anti-principle, anti-enlightenment, anti-religious, anti-fascist, anti-functional, anti-eczematous, etc.). (print edition: M .: Russian dictionaries, 1999; electronic version: “Literacy.ru”, 2002, https://www.gramota.ru/slovari).
According to paragraph 7 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 3 defamatory, in particular, are the information:
- on violation by a citizen or legal entity of the current legislation,
- about committing a dishonest act,
- about improper, unethical behavior in personal, social or political life.
- on dishonesty in the implementation of production, business and business activities,
- violation of business ethics or business customs.
It is quite obvious that the prefix “anti”, which means “hostility directed against someone, something”, covers the cases mentioned above in the Resolution of the Plenum of the RF Armed Forces No. 3.
Thus, the comparison in the domain name of the site www.antirao.ru of the prefix anti to the Russian copyright society, has the meaning of "hostility directed against someone, something" indicates the defaming nature of this domain name.
Linguistically, the domain name www.antirao.ru is tantamount to the statement "RAO carries out illegal activities and we must fight against it." This is confirmed, among other things, by the following statements: “For any music that sounds in your restaurant (trading floor, store, etc.) you will have to make regular deductions to the Russian Open Society .... We propose to ignore this system and save your money. ” Thus, it should be recognized that the information defaming the Claimant (domain www.antirao.ru) is disseminated in the form of a statement and can be checked for consistency with reality.
At the same time, the Respondent must prove that the Russian copyright society violates the current legislation and does not have the right to collect royalties in favor of authors and other rightholders, for which it must submit relevant court decisions that have entered into legal force or other acts of authorized bodies confirming these facts.
In accordance with Art. 12 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the protection of civil rights is carried out by restoring the situation that existed before the violation of the law and suppression of actions that violate the right or create a threat of its violation.
3. Concerning non-material damage.
In accordance with paragraph 5, 7 of Art. 152 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, a citizen or legal entity in relation to whom information is discredited defaming business reputation has the right to demand compensation for losses and reputational damage caused by their distribution.
The legal entity’s right to compensation for non-material damage caused by the derogation of business reputation meets the fundamental principles of protecting personal non-property rights of citizens and legal entities and is recognized by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 04.12.2003, No. 508 – O).
The Russian copyright society, in accordance with the charter, carries out copyright management activities on a collective basis, makes payments to the authors of the remuneration due to them, and protects the rights of authors.
The impeccable reputation of the Russian copyright society has developed over a long time (since 1993, when the Russian copyright society was created).
The information disseminated by the Respondent that is not true is aimed at creating a strong conviction among readers that:
- The Russian copyright society in collecting royalties acts by illegal methods,
- requirements of the Russian Authors Society directed to owners of cafes, shops, restaurants, etc. and other persons using the works regarding the payment of royalties are illegal, therefore they can and should be ignored.
Thus, this information undermines the credibility of the Russian copyright society, created over many years, and the credibility of it both on the part of authors and users of works.
The Russian copyright society determines the non-material (reputational) harm caused to it by the distribution by the Respondent of information that does not correspond to reality and discredits the plaintiff's business reputation in the amount of 300,000 (three hundred thousand) rubles.
4. Concerning the jurisdiction of this dispute.
According to Art. 33 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, cases of protecting business reputation in entrepreneurial and other economic activities are assigned to the jurisdiction of the arbitration court.
In accordance with clause 2.5.3. of the charter, the Russian author society, within the limits of its authority, concludes license agreements on the granting of rights to the appropriate ways of using copyright objects under the terms of a simple (non-exclusive) license and collects the remuneration stipulated by the agreements from users, enters into agreements on the payment of remuneration and collects remuneration under such agreements .
The statements referred to in Section 2 of this statement of claim that are not true affect the activities of the Russian Authors Society in collecting royalties, as well as in paying remuneration to authors, i.e. contain an assessment of the economic activity of RAO.
Thus, the present dispute is subordinate to the arbitration court.
Based on the foregoing, in accordance with Article.Article. 12, 152 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of February 24, 2005 No. 3, Article 4, 33, 125, 126 of the APK of the Russian Federation,
The Russian copyright society asks the arbitration court:
1. To declare that the following information is not true and defaming the business reputation of the Russian copyright society:
- The domain name of the site "www.antirao.ru".
2. To recover with Milanina M ___________ And _________ externally 300,000 (three hundred thousand) rubles in compensation for the non-material (reputation) damage caused by derogation of the plaintiff's business reputation.
3. To recover with Milanina M ___________ And _________ the costs of paying the state duty in the amount of 4,000 (four thousand) rubles.
Applications:
1. Evidence of the direction of this application and the documents attached to it to the persons participating in the case (originals).
2. Payment orders for payment of state duty (originals).
3. Protocol inspection site www.resident.su/ru/antirao.html, compiled by notary Totsky N. N. 03.03.2009g. (copy).
4. Protocol inspection site www.antirao.ru, compiled by a notary Totsky N. N. 03.03.2009g. (copy).
5. Protocol inspection site www.resident.su/ru/antirao.html compiled by a notary Totsky N. N. 11.11.2009g. (copy).
6. Protocol inspection site www.antirao.ru, compiled by a notary Totsky N. N. 03.03.2009g. (copy).
7. The charter of the Russian copyright society.
8. Protocol on the election of the General Director of RAO.
9. Certificate of state registration of radioactive waste.
General Director (signature, seal) S. S. Fedotov
May 20, 2009


(Source: https://www.netadvocate.org/node/683)

 

[Адвокат]

Quote: RESPONSE: Odnoklassniki Limited Liability Company
Address: 115114, Moscow, Derbenevskaya nab., D. 7, p. 17, floor 3, apt. I
State duty: 100 rubles

Who will accept such a statement from me, where the line of the respondent will be empty?
After all, the defendant is ANONYMOUS !?
This is the nail of the problem! [/ Color]

I answered this question in the first answer to the topic you created

The court does not search for unknown persons; it can satisfy your request for the demand for evidence within the framework of the claimed Claim.

With a request to establish the owner of the site, you can contact the hoster.

 

[частный детектив София]

Identification through court ...

As I already wrote, the hoster is Latvia (silent on my repeated emails. There is no usual Internet address for the hoster), the host is Ukraine. And then, is it possible to file a lawsuit in order to obtain authorization to identify the bodies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs?