PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS OF INFLUENCE ON OFFENDERS.

[Частный детектив ОДБ. Новосибирск.]

Methodology for identifying persons illegally released from conscription

Methodology for identifying persons illegally exempted from military service.

When carrying out supervisory measures in this area, first of all, the systematization of the data of persons who are on military records of 4 departments of military commissariats is carried out on the basis of clause 1 of Article 23 of the Federal Law "On Military Duty and Military Service" stipulated by subparagraph "a".
It is advisable to carry out this work by means of Microsoftoffice (Exel), creating with its help a table containing the following information:
1. Full name citizen;
2. Military ID number;
3. Date, month, year of birth;
4. Date, month, year of conscription for military service (in the case of conscription);
5. The date, month, year of enrollment in the reserve;
6. Basis (article of column II of the schedule of diseases and TDT);
7. Place of previous registration (2 (4) branch of the inspected or other military commissariat);
8. The date, month, year of staging in 4 departments of the pre-war commissariat.
The indicated data are collected from the “Registration Cards” of citizens of draft age stored in 4 departments of military commissariats.
Upon completion of this work, it is necessary to recover from the 2 offices of the military commissariat “Alphabetical Books”.
From these documents, data are taken on the persons removed from their military registration in the 2nd branch of this military commissariat in connection with the transfer to a new place of residence, which in turn are checked against a database compiled from the results of work in the 4th branch.
In the course of this reconciliation, persons who have withdrawn Svoyinsky registration due to a change of place of residence are revealed, after which they are again reinstated in military registration in the 4th branch of this military commissariat as newly arrived.

In this case, special attention should be paid to the time interval between the moment of withdrawal from military registration in the 2nd division and registration in the 4th division.
As a rule, it is difficult to establish military registration at the indicated time, arrive at the military commissariat, register with the territorial bodies of the Federal Migration Service of the Russian Federation, citizens registration centers, go to the medical commission, withdraw from registration, register for military service in 4 departments (weekends and holidays, on which these institutions do not carry out their activities, the significant remoteness of the military commissariats from each other, etc.).
After that, according to the persons identified during this reconciliation, it is necessary to recover from all military commissariats, where they were in the military registration, the following documents:
-Full copies of personal files;
- Copies of the minutes of the meeting of the draft committee;
-Copy of registration cards;
- Originals of exculpatory documents for the removal of Svoyinsky registration in connection with a change in the place of residence of these recruits;
- Originals of journals of incoming and outgoing correspondence indicating the dispatch of the above documents;
- Originals of postscripts.

In addition, from the military commissariat where the military ticket was received, it is necessary to request copies of the statements for the issuance of military tickets of the corresponding numbers and series.

A thorough analysis of these documents in their interconnection allows you to fully reveal the facts of illegal exemption from military service for conscription and unreasonable issuance of military IDs, as well as officials involved in these facts.

In addition, additional information to help expose these facts can be obtained from the territorial bodies of the Federal Migration Service of the Russian Federation, citizens registration centers.

Abstracts on the topic
"Methodology for identifying persons illegally
exempted from military service. ”
The main point of conducting prosecutorial audits of legislation in the field of combating corruption in military commissariats when organizing a conscription is to identify systemic corruption schemes and mechanisms that allow conscripts to evade military service when aiding by officials of military commissariats.
At the same time, on their own strengths, i.e., the possibilities of prosecutorial supervision, those official crimes are revealed (Article 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - abuse of power, Article 292 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - official forgery), where the victim’s statement is not necessary. And further verification of the revealed facts will subsequently reveal other related duty crimes (Article 290 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - receiving a bribe, Article 291 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - giving a bribe).
In this regard, a methodology was developed for conducting checks in this area of prosecutorial activity.
When developing the methodology, it was taken into account that, in a number of cases, people of draft age who were illegally exempted from military service were deregistered for a short period of time in the 2nd department (clerks to be drafted) of the military commissariat due to their departure to another military commissariat and after a short period of time time (1-2 months) there was a record in the 4th department (accounting of persons in reserve) of the same military commissariat as persons not subject to conscription for various reasons. At the same time, the indicated persons received exemption from conscription on various grounds in the military commissariat where they were sent down for some time. There are also possible options when people were exempted from military service and they were given military tickets intended for issuance to other citizens, but not issued for various reasons (being in places of punishment, etc.) or a different category of fitness for military service was indicated (instead of “G” - temporary , "B" is of limited use).

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Re: Methodology for identifying persons illegally released from conscription

Thank.

 

[Частный детектив ОДБ. Новосибирск.]

PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS OF INFLUENCING OFFENDERS. (11574)
Original message
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS OF INFLUENCING OFFENDERS.

1. Methods of the right of other mental influence on the personality of the interrogated person, counteracting the investigation.

The basis of the investigator's strategy in the situation of counteraction to the investigation is the disclosure of the meaning and significance of the available information, the senselessness and absurdity of false testimony, the futility of the position of denial. To implement this strategy, you need high reflexivity, information insight, flexibility, and the ability to use the information received for the development of the investigation process.
In overcoming the opposition of persons trying to misinform the investigation, the advantage is on the side of the investigator — he knows the material of the case, has the opportunity to carefully prepare for the interrogation, study the personality of the interrogated person, his strengths and weaknesses, features of his behavior in conflict situations, use a system of effective techniques to overcome the opposition.
However, the investigator has his own difficulties. Methods and means of mental influence on the interrogated persons have the limits stipulated by the law. The law prohibits the solicitation of testimony through violence, threats, and other illegal measures. In court proceedings, mental violence, blackmail, threats, deception, unfounded promises, the use of religious prejudices, the lack of culture of the interrogated, ignorance of their rights, etc. are unacceptable. Along with this, there are also moral and psychological limits of influence - the prolongation of nervous and emotional breakdowns, the aggravation of severe mental states are morally unacceptable.
However, when solving tactical tasks, rigid methods of mental influence are unavoidable, putting the behavior of the opposing person in the framework that limits his decisions.
Techniques for overcoming counteraction to the investigation, as a rule, are designed for the critical thinking of the accused, his analysis of the course of the investigation. Sometimes the accused (suspect) can anticipate the progress of the investigation, which in reality may not yet be achieved. Bringing the accused to such a reflection of reality for tactical purposes is not only not reprehensible, but also not illegal. This is the basis for successful tactical interaction with him.
Techniques of mental influence have a super-task — to psychologically disarm the opposing person, to promote their understanding of the unfitness, depravity of the chosen means of counteraction, to help them change the motivation of behavior. Methods of mental influence are not methods of suppressing the will of the interrogated person, but methods of logical influence on his consciousness. They are based, first of all, on the identification of internal contradictions in the defensive actions of the opposing person, their main mental purpose is to demonstrate the unreliability of false testimony, their doom to expose.
The falsity of testimony is exposed, first of all, by the available evidence. The volume of available evidence is the subject of increased anticipatory activity of the interrogated person. The guilty person, as a rule, exaggerates the amount of available evidence, since all the parties essential for the investigation of the act committed by him are functioning intensively in his mind. The protective dominant aggravates these processes. (A person who has not committed a crime cannot have an exaggerated idea of the amount of evidence available to the investigation.)
When interrogating K., the suspect in the murder, the investigator examined the photos, which were visible to K. only from the back side. The envelope from which the photographs were extracted, with the inscription "Personally to the prosecutor", lay on the table. Is this an investigator's action permissible, even if the photos depicted landscapes or popular film actresses? Acceptable, since they didn't commit the suspect to anything. However, it was after this that K. confessed to the crime, interpreting the photos as incriminating circumstances
Any tactical method of mental influence is legitimate, if it is not aimed at extorting a confession, is not associated with a violation of moral norms, direct lies, or suppression of the will of the person under investigation
Often, the techniques of mental influence are implemented in an acute form of conflict, causing a frustrated state of the interrogated person, which reduces the possibility of his counteraction.
To strengthen the frustrating effect of the main incriminating evidence, it is necessary to prepare it psychologically for the presentation of the interrogated person, and to temporarily switch his attention to the circumstances that seem to favor his "legend". The subsequent contrast effect will be mentally more effective. However, during the interrogation, it is important to correctly, objectively establish the very fact of opposition, not to show excessive suspicion. You can not judge the truthfulness or not truthfulness only by the emotional manifestations of the interrogated person — stuttering, redness, trembling of the limbs, etc.Various fluctuations and doubts are not an indicator of resistance. "The liar always stands on his own, and the truthful one usually begins to get confused at the end, confused by the doubts that have arisen about the truth of his words."
A psychologically justified tactic should be selective - it should have the greatest impact on the mental state of the guilty person and be neutral in relation to the innocent, it should have a "shock" effect — it should be unexpected, unencrypted in advance by the interrogated person.
Template techniques, primitive "tricks" not only have no tactical effectiveness, but also reveal to the interrogated person the tactical helplessness of the investigator.

Techniques of mental influence on the opposing person, in order to change his position and obtain truthful testimony, can be divided into the following subgroups:

1) techniques based on the use of individual psychological qualities of the interrogated person;
2) techniques based on the confidence of the interrogated person in the identity of the
investigator;
3) methods of informing the interrogated person about the availability of reliable evidentiary information;
4) techniques that create an exaggerated idea of the volume of available evidence in the interrogated person;
5) techniques of increased emotional impact associated with the presentation of unexpected information.

The accused (suspect), who opposes the investigator, constantly evaluates the meaning and significance of the questions asked to him, evaluates them as a factor of possible exposure. The very system of the investigator's questions creates a background of mental tension
Not only direct exposure of a lie, but also anything that is interpreted by a liar as approaching exposure, weakens his mental state, causing internal excitement and anxiety. Against this background, the investigator can effectively use the technique of forming an exaggerated idea of the investigator's awareness in the person under investigation. For this purpose, the investigator can make extensive use of data on the identity of the accused (suspect), details of his behavior on the eve of the crime, his connections, and the demonstration of objects associated with the crime committed by the accused (suspect). The sequence of presentation of evidence must demonstrate the investigator's awareness of the sequence of criminal actions of the accused (suspect).

One of the methods of legitimate mental influence is to conceal from the person under investigation the gaps in the system of evidence. By showing an increased interest in the minor details of the event, the investigator indirectly makes it clear that the main thing is already known to him. At the same time, it is important that the interrogated person does not receive information about the ignorance of the investigator on a particular issue, and the interrogated person constantly allows "leakage" of information, shows awareness of those circumstances that can only be known to the person involved in the crime under investigation. As already mentioned, for this purpose, the technique of "indirect interrogation" is widely used, when the main questions are masked as "low-risk". Thus, questions that reveal the interrogator's ignorance of the circumstances that he would have known if his alibi had not been false acquire an incriminating orientation.
A great opportunity for the provision of legitimate mental influence lies in the system of presenting evidence.

Here are some rules for the effective presentation of evidence:
1) before presenting evidence, ask all the necessary questions in order to exclude the tricks of the accused or suspect that neutralize them;
2) incriminating evidence should be presented in the most tactically appropriate situations, against the background of a mental state of relaxation (relaxation) or tension, depending on the personal characteristics of the interrogated person;
3) present evidence, as a rule, according to their increasing significance;
4) for each proof, get an explanation and record these explanations;
5) when recognizing the falsity of previously given testimony, immediately record new testimony and certify it with the signature of the interrogated person;
6) fully disclose the forensic significance of the evidence presented.

One of the main means of mental influence is the question of the investigator. He
contains the direction of the investigative search, transmits to another person the information orientation of the questioner. So the question is: "How many people were in the room?" it contains information about the investigator's awareness that in a certain place, at a certain time, there were people involved in the crime. This question also allows for the idea that the investigator may know who was there.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Thank!