Tax immunity for private investigators!

[Группа К]

[DLMURL="https://www.roi.ru/38681"] ROI :: Tax immunity for private investigators [/ DLMURL]

Through the website, the ROI published an initiative to give detectives tax immunity. It is clear that to collect 100 thousand votes is a fabulous utopia. However, this method is the most understandable and affordable for practicing detectives. So if we don’t want for us, and without our opinion, lovers to sit and confer, to change something or to accept, then I propose to go to the site and vote “For”.

In order to vote, you must have a registration on the website of public services

Respectfully,
Alexander

 

[Группа К]

[DLMURL="https://www.roi.ru/38681"] and this is a direct link to the page with the initiative [/ DLMURL] https://www.roi.ru/38681

 

[Детективное агентство ОПЦИОН]

The initiative is interesting, but for example, I also have legal services included. Then by this petition, I do not fall into this initiative. Can fix just this type of activity? Without the "one"?

 

[Группа К]

Alexander! I can’t fix anything already. According to the procedure, you can change something in the petition before submitting an application for publication. Then the application goes through the admissibility process, which can last a month or more and only then the petition appears on the ROI page.
Any person with an account on the GosUslg website can vote, so if you share the desire of detective K. and his colleagues not to pay tax on the cases under investigation, then please put your signature))

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

"FOR" - 3 (three)
"AGAINST" - 8 (eight).
The position “AGAINST” must be removed so that the statistics do not spoil .

 

[Группа К]

The position “AGAINST” must be removed so that the statistics do not spoil.

On the contrary, Konstantin! Negative for me will be an indicator of the number of detectives who pay taxes from investigations, know the real price of entrepreneurial risk and dream of getting rid of an unfair tax burden. There are Three of them so far!

 

[Наумов Александр]

Weird! I thought ALL entrepreneurs pay taxes and fees.
And what is the difference between our sphere for legislators? I can’t invent yet.
Or maybe Comrade "K" at the expense of his, I’m not afraid of this word, writer’s talent is trying to influence the minds?
I am for K., but against his position ... Is that possible?

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Now
FOR - 13 (thirteen)
"AGAINST" - 48 (forty eight).
The dynamics of the excess of “three times” against “FOR” is SAVED.

 

[Виталий Климин]

Collecting 100 thousand votes is not a problem, just in the future this initiative will fall under the cloth, who will let you not pay taxes ......

 

[Группа К]

And what is the difference between our sphere for legislators?

Alexander, I as a specialist presented the petition as logical and shorter as possible. Here, "writing talent" will not help. Thus, he tried not to pour water, but logically substantiate his main argument that entrepreneurs must pay taxes, but detectives, which by their nature ( not by law !) These are not - taxes should not be paid.

Moreover, in cases where they conduct a private investigation.

I assumed that the proposal would cause a negative, but that with such an advantage, almost three times! Here is what you should really think about ... In my opinion, these statistics divide the detectives into 2 (two) camps, which you and the rest of our esteemed colleagues already know about. The former work with a license and carry out investigations at their own risk, using the settlement account of their individual entrepreneur to collect evidence. The second ones — they work either without a license — or “hide behind” a one-day firm to collect information.

There are still those who consider detective work as additional or even casual earnings. There is nothing wrong with that. After all, the law allows you to pay for a patent and sleep peacefully. But the fact of the matter is, if for a detective who constantly solves the problem of admissible collection of evidence, a patent problem does not solve. We cannot justify the seller of expensive goods that need to be bought for investigation purposes that we use the simplified tax system or we have a patent in our business, because this may be followed by the question "what is the reason for using this tax regime?"

As you know, none of the detectives of the “first camp” provides any documents in support of their type of tax accounting, but twists their hands to the bone crunch.

The problem is simple to solve - to abolish taxes for the private investigator in general. Moreover, there are not so many active of us.

Thanks to everyone who supported me.

Sincerely, Alexander