Answer the question TOGETHER !!

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Dear Colleagues! One of our services is CREATION OF ALIBI and CHECK OF ALIBI. I had such a correspondence:
Question I received : "Checking an alibi and creating an alibi"
Here I ask in more detail. How is it creating an alibi?

My answer: I will answer without revealing the specifics Sorry ....... our experts are able to create convincing evidence and facts that you were there and there when you were in a completely different place. I emphasize the attention- THIS SERVICE MAY BE APPLIED ONLY AT A HOUSEHOLD LEVEL and CATEGORically DOES NOT APPEAR IF DIRECTLY OR CONSEQUENTLY CONNECTED WITH ANY KIND OF CRIMINALITY, not to mention the CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY ... ......
....... You asked a question about a very rarely performed service

The next question that came to me: Question to help: A client contacted you about checking an alibi. It turned out that your company provided an alibi. Your actions?

Colleagues! How would you really act in this situation in order to comply with ethical standards and fulfill an order? .... Your answers are watched by people who asked a question Help a colleague

 

[Детективное агентство Кострома]

Well, probably it will be ethical to refuse a client with an alibi check. Otherwise, is it not a scam. On the issue of creating an alibi by ear, the initiation of criminal cases in Moscow. A number of firms were closed. And for me it’s better to check than to create an alibi.
Now we have a bigger problem. Revealed the theft committed in 2008. they assisted in the detention of a citizen of Ukraine (no offense), and then a relative came to us with a request to find a lawyer for him. Found us on the Internet. Will have to search.
Alexander K.

 

[DIBNN]

Only at the level of assumptions, we do not provide this service.
In a specific case that theoretically occurred with a colleague, it is logical to refuse an order for verification. It is necessary to find convincing arguments for refusal, so as not to look suspicious for the customer.
It is difficult to sit on two chairs at once.
But it’s better not to provide this service at all.
With uv. DIB

 

[Частный детектив. Егор227.]

Colleague, this is “punching” pranksters: D. Question and answer are on the Internet, so your counterpart thinks that he will remain anonymous. In conditions of anonymity, a person is able to ask various tricky questions,: lol: it unties the hands, or rather the words. They make fun of your colleague’s reaction and can go on some kind of meanness, for example, copy your answers and post on another forum or chat. So easy for fun. My opinion is not to respond to this dialogue. The best punishment for the spiteful person is oblivion ..... like someone Guatama was walking with his disciples, and on the road some fuligans began to insult Guatama, the disciples rushed at the fuligans. But then Guatama left the disciples and they moved on. He said something there, but I do not remember literally. But the point is that do not touch G will not be ...

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Colleague, this is “punching” pranksters: D. Question and answer are on the Internet, so your counterpart thinks that he will remain anonymous. In conditions of anonymity, a person is able to ask various tricky questions,: lol: it unties the hands, or rather the words. They make fun of your colleague’s reaction and can go on some kind of meanness, for example, copy your answers and post on another forum or chat. So easy for fun. My opinion is not to respond to this dialogue. The best punishment for the spiteful person is oblivion ..... like someone Guatama was walking with his disciples, and on the road some fuligans began to insult Guatama, the disciples rushed at the fuligans. But then Guatama left the disciples and they moved on. He said something there, but I do not remember literally. But the point is that do not touch G will not be ...

These are not our methods, colleague )) We can’t get away from the most tricky questions. We’re not crooks to hide or hush up something ) ...... And there it’s a matter of ethics of a “prankster” what to do with answers

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

Well, probably it will be ethical to refuse a client with an alibi check. Otherwise, is it not a scam. On the issue of creating an alibi by ear, the initiation of criminal cases in Moscow. A number of firms were closed. And for me it’s better to check than to create an alibi.
Now we have a bigger problem. Revealed the theft committed in 2008. they assisted in the detention of a citizen of Ukraine (no offense), and then a relative came to us with a request to find a lawyer for him. Found us on the Internet. Will have to search.
Alexander K.

Alexander!
I was taught this way - you need to put a person in jail so that he would be grateful to you for that!
"Close" and find a lawyer - this is normal (this is my personal opinion).

And in the place of Igor, personally, I would not take up the order.
Even if this is not a setup - over time, the problem may come out (although it may not come out).
For this reason, I prefer a personal meeting with a client. And 100% trust my intuition.
Although intuition does not give guarantees, but in conjunction with other factors, the percentage of risk is reduced.
Yours faithfully

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Only at the level of assumptions, we do not provide this service.
In a specific case that theoretically occurred with a colleague, it is logical to refuse an order for verification. It is necessary to find convincing arguments for refusal, so as not to look suspicious for the customer.
It is difficult to sit on two chairs at once.
But it’s better not to provide this service at all.
With uv. DIB

Maybe it’s better not to provide .... but we only talk about it if it does not apply to crime, etc. ..... It’s simple, sometimes I really want to help people in trouble .... .

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

Colleague, this is “punching” pranksters: D. Question and answer are on the Internet, so your counterpart thinks that he will remain anonymous. In conditions of anonymity, a person is able to ask various tricky questions,: lol: it unties the hands, or rather the words. They make fun of your colleague’s reaction and can go on some kind of meanness, for example, copy your answers and post on another forum or chat. So easy for fun. My opinion is not to respond to this dialogue. The best punishment for the spiteful person is oblivion ..... like someone Guatama was walking with his disciples, and on the road some fuligans began to insult Guatama, the disciples rushed at the fuligans. But then Guatama left the disciples and they moved on. He said something there, but I do not remember literally. But the point is that do not touch G will not be ...

Somewhere I heard it before?
What does this remind me of ??

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Well, probably it will be ethical to refuse a client with an alibi check. Otherwise, is it not a scam. On the issue of creating an alibi by ear, the initiation of criminal cases in Moscow. A number of firms were closed. And for me it’s better to check than to create an alibi.
Now we have a bigger problem. Revealed the theft committed in 2008. they assisted in the detention of a citizen of Ukraine (no offense), and then a relative came to us with a request to find a lawyer for him. Found us on the Internet. Will have to search.
Alexander K.

Alexander!
I was taught this way - you need to put a person in jail so that he would be grateful to you for that!
"Close" and find a lawyer - this is normal (this is my personal opinion).

And in the place of Igor, personally, I would not take up the order.
Even if this is not a setup - over time, the problem may come out (although it may not come out).
For this reason, I prefer a personal meeting with a client. And 100% trust my intuition.
Although intuition does not give guarantees, but in conjunction with other factors, the percentage of risk is reduced.
Yours faithfully

Here we are not talking about a specific order .... simply, a question was asked, but I like to answer ALL private questions either myself or with the help of colleagues

 

[Анатолий Маланченко]

Question I received : "Checking an alibi and creating an alibi"
Here I ask in more detail. How is it creating an alibi?


The next question that came to me: Question to help: A client contacted you about checking an alibi. It turned out that your company provided an alibi. Your actions?

In fact, strange questions. Especially the second - as if on an exam.