Text sms

[Арсен]

En las estructuras de poder actuales, solo quedan prostitutas para servir

Me opongo categóricamente!
Esta tesis no es solo controvertida, es incorrecta en esencia, poco convincente en forma y ofensiva en contenido ...
Sugiero que la administración del Foro use más activamente sus poderes para frenar esas perlas.

¡Yo apoyo!

¡Acepto a Andrey Nikolaevich! Si ofendí a alguien, me disculpo sinceramente.

 

[Патрушев Михаил Владимирович]

:! ::! ::!:

Respondiendo la pregunta de Mikhail sobre los derechos de BH ... Derechos de BH nadie "agregará" ... Este es precisamente el "truco" completo ... En nuestra opinión, "acrobacias aéreas" en el BH es recopilar información de interés la ausencia de "xivy" ... Solo usando sus habilidades personales, posiblemente adquiridas mientras trabajaba en el "sistema" y el tiempo de operación ... Y al mismo tiempo trate de no violar la Ley ...: lol:

 

[Детективное агентство Москва]

Colegas !!!!
Lo siento, me topé con este oscuro tema un poco tarde.

En primer lugar, estos son eventos hace un año (julio del año pasado) y no está completamente claro por qué Konstantin
"emocionado" en este momento ... El caso no ha sido cerrado por mucho tiempo, sino suspendido.

En segundo lugar, conozco tanto a los "acusados" como colegas decentes y honestos que son bastante dignos.
para ser miembros del MOD, a los cuales con mucho gusto les daré una recomendación. Uno de ellos, por cierto, estaba en Lermontovo.
Y el "negocio" en ellos se basó principalmente en una "configuración" limpia, cuando ambos paquetes de etiquetas
Billetes en un pedido grande. Puedo contarte los detalles en la conferencia.

Propongo no deshonrar a colegas completamente dignos incluso en nuestro círculo estrecho, y aún más en el hilo abierto del foro y
¡INMEDIATAMENTE RETIRE ESTE TEMA!

Konstantin! Lo siento, pero te mereces una censura por separado. Al publicar temas, mire cuidadosamente la fecha
eventos y por quién estará "enganchado" a esto.

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Konstantin! Lo siento, pero te mereces una censura por separado. Al publicar temas, mire cuidadosamente la fecha
eventos y por quién estará "enganchado" a esto.

No voy a hacer eso nunca más. : oops:

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

: lol:

 

[anya-m]

Please help me understand the situation.
Criminal case under art. 159 part 2, 159 part 2 of the UKRF (Fraud with causing significant damage to citizens by deception AND breach of trust) was completed on Friday. They wrote a refusal to write petitions and on Monday the materials of the case will be submitted to the prosecutor. I would like to have a printout for trial SMS texts suspect-accused, in order to prove the intent and extent of the fraud, confirmation of the threats sent. As part of the criminal case, the investigator did not send such a request. Is it possible to fill out a petition by my lawyer, or is it now only in court to prove the need to provide this information (get it through a court request) or can this information be requested in a statement to the prosecutor’s office, where I ask the district prosecutor to attend the hearing?

Hopefully articulated a train of thought:?

 

[Роберт]

Please help me understand the situation.
Criminal case under art. 159 part 2, 159 part 2 of the UKRF (Fraud with causing significant damage to citizens by deception AND breach of trust) was completed on Friday. They wrote a refusal to write petitions and on Monday the materials of the case will be submitted to the prosecutor. I would like to have a printout for trial SMS texts suspect-accused, in order to prove the intent and scope of the fraud, confirmation of the threats sent. As part of the criminal case, the investigator did not send such a request. Is it possible to fill out a petition by my lawyer, or is it now only in court to prove the need to provide this information (obtain it through a court request) or can this information be requested in a statement to the prosecutor's office, where I ask the district prosecutor to attend the hearing?

Hopefully articulated a train of thought:?

Yes, just a motivated request by a lawyer at the hearing will greatly contribute to the proper resolution of the case. If the lawyer focuses on the fact that this information is crucial for the court to resolve the case. The prosecutor will therefore bring charges in court. If the lawyer writes a petition before the case is sent to court, that’s good too. You need to notify the prosecutor. If he considers that the investigator has not completed something, he will refuse to support the prosecution and the case will be returned to the investigator. Question in time. Maybe all the approvals have already been signed and the case has gone to court.

 

[Детектив-Молдова]

Dear, Anya, you should remember one rule that when considering a case, the court can never go beyond the limits of the charge presented during the preliminary investigation, especially if this aggravates the fate of the defendant.
You had to insist on this petition at the preliminary investigation stage. It is not too late to make this petition to the prosecutor before he has sent the case to court. Go to a higher prosecutor if the supervisor refuses to accept the application.

In fact, the court does not collect evidence, it judges by the evidence that was collected during the investigation and found confirmation during the trial.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

I agree with the respected Nikolai Vasilyevich .... The petitions must be submitted in a timely manner, at the stage of the preliminary investigation ... If such a petition was filed during the investigation, but was rejected, only then it can be re-filed in court ... And that will raise the question - why didn’t they appeal the refusal in accordance with the CCrP ... It seems that even if such a motion is made, the essence of the charge will not be affected and most likely it will be rejected by the court ... (but I say this without knowing all the circumstances of the case ... Details consultation can be given only if you get acquainted with all the materials of the case ... And so, these are just words) ... If there is a lawyer, all questions to the lawyer, who should know all the circumstances of the case, at least ...

 

[Eugen]

Colleagues are not offended, but it’s very impudent to listen to officials from the state apparatus and I think the FSB is not interested in retirement, but in the customer. After all, the work of the detective agency, in my opinion, is the non-disclosure of data about the customer and the first place should be not the pursuit of profit, but the image of the agency. Do not forget that the state has entrusted us with some secrets and its methods of work, and we must remember this. After all, I am sure that each of you was a cadet, lieutenant, excitedly taught OPD and perhaps understood that this is a great confidence of the state.