Alexander Mitrofanov: Data arrays were replaced by streams. And in

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

I will always be interested in only one solution technique. Conditions, the result will never interest me. : D

Yes, for the sake of bo. However, if something is not personally necessary for you, this does not mean that nobody needs it. There are captains of port tugs, and there are captains of supertankers. To each his own.

 

[Роберт]

Of course it doesn’t. In Ocian, both captains are the same Cossacks. : D

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

Of course it doesn’t. In Ocian, both captains are the same Cossacks. : D

I will not argue. I can only say that once I get tired of communicating in such a meaningless spirit and I just leave. And understand all of you here among themselves, who needs what. And take the information yourself where it lies.

You see, I would like in exchange for that information. which I give away (note, done for free) to see the conversation of professionals and in essence. And not a kindergarten, with some small nit-picking, reproaches and senseless picks.

Sorry for being blunt. I speak as it is.

 

[Роберт]

I just thought that there are certain techniques for working with information flows. And standing knee-deep or throat: D in the water in the information river and scooping out from the palm of your hand is somewhat inconvenient. Bored, because goals (decisions) can be reached after an infinitely long time. That is why it is important to swim, you need to learn how to swim.
Sorry for the directness, I also say as it is. By the way, I can only swim in flippers, but not very bad. Without fins do not swim and 10 meters. : D

 

[Роберт]

For me personally, at this stage of studying the methods of working with the Internet, it is not clear how to specifically determine the purpose of the search. Now it seems that basically the essence of information retrieval is akin to the work of a minesweeper. We rake everything in a row and then we sort it into the right one and not. And so many many times. And how not to miss: D? That's what the dog rummaged through! Like you, it is a pity for the time spent, suddenly wasted.
The position of our esteemed colleagues, Lemke GE and others is reduced to the principle of take everything, then it can come in handy. It is understandable that now in the internet there may not be tomorrow. Unfortunately, I personally cannot yet understand how this applies to work on specific goals. Although I have the habit of not throwing anything out: D, I'm saving up like Plyushkin.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

I just thought that there are certain techniques for working with information flows.

Exist. And in the relevant sections of this forum they are given. No problem - study there. Why try to look for practice in the section entitled "THEORY"? And what's the point of getting upset. not finding her there?

And standing knee-deep or throat: D in the water in the information river and scooping out from the palm of your hand is somewhat inconvenient. Bored, because goals (decisions) can be reached after an infinitely long time. That is why it is important to swim, you need to learn how to swim.
Sorry for the directness, I also say as it is.

In order to learn how to work with flows, it’s not bad, for starters, to realize that they even exist and why it is important. Streams, as an alternative and addition to databases, have appeared recently. And they are gaining more and more weight. And this is a cardinal change in the situation.

Who will understand this will be ahead. Whoever does not understand will lag behind. Perhaps it will lag behind forever - because it supports young people who don't need to explain it to - it already knows.

As for the importance of the topic (perhaps not for you personally, but the importance as such). Alexander Mitrofanov is a former employee of the Foreign Intelligence Service of Russia. Subsequently, an employee of the Security Services of a number of large enterprises. Moreover, he carried out such stunning operations, with multi-paths and on very expensive issues, that they could be entered into textbooks if it could be published.
So - when such a specialist talks about what is connected with his specialty - this in itself is worth a lot.

Well, as for me and my stay here - it is unlikely that you yourself will be able to answer the question: "Eugene, have you yet been hesitated to listen to emotions instead of talking on the merits and spend time on this garbage?"
Therefore, I have a very big request to all those present: let's talk about the topic. Do not understand why this is for you - it is not a question - pass by. We didn’t understand any details - of course, let's clarify.

But let's stop discussion of issues not related to the topic. We are all working people and we can spend the little free time that we have with greater benefit than in boring skirmishes. And even more so, you and I must not prove anything to anyone. "We talked, found out incomprehensible questions on the topic of the topic - and went to work" - this is the format that is acceptable to me. No other options.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

For me personally, at this stage of studying the methods of working with the Internet, it is not clear how to specifically determine the purpose of the search. Now it seems that basically the essence of information retrieval is akin to the work of a minesweeper. We rake everything in a row and then we sort it into the right one and not. And so many many times. And how not to miss: D? That's what the dog rummaged through! Like you, it is a pity for the time spent, suddenly wasted.
The position of our esteemed colleagues, Lemke GE and others is reduced to the principle of take everything, then it can come in handy. It is understandable that now in the internet there may not be tomorrow. Unfortunately, I personally cannot yet understand how this applies to work on specific goals. Although I have the habit of not throwing anything out: D, I'm saving up like Plyushkin.

You pick up the "Intelligence Cycle", delve into its uncomplicated essence and go strictly along it. Do not make a mistake. That is how intelligence works. Everything is clear and extremely specific.

And "Take it - it may come in handy" - this is an "information vacuum cleaner." Personally, I strongly advise against using it - because you will drown.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

I made the Intelligence Cycle a separate topic. Take a look at it.
com / viewtopic.php? amp; f = 344 & t = 11267

 

[Роберт]

Yeah, the cycle. So I constantly have a desire to drag you into a private section. Personally, I feel more comfortable there. But no way, other colleagues will condemn me for such treachery: D. Anyway, it feels like a certain border, which is not to go here.

 

[Ющук Евгений Леонидович]

Yeah, the cycle. So I constantly have a desire to drag you into a private section. Personally, I feel more comfortable there. But no way, other colleagues will condemn me for such treachery: D. Anyway, it feels like a certain border, which is not to go here.

Yeah, exactly the cycle.
Try to pay attention to the theory and understand it - and then your tools will work much better. because an architect with a shovel and a guest worker with the same shovel have different results. Even with the same level of ownership of this shovel.

In addition - in relation to the intelligence cycle - I don’t understand at all what needs to be discussed in a closed (what to laugh - from whom is it really closed, from children?) Section. I see no problem discussing any issue in an abstract. those. on a hypothetical example without names, appearances and passwords.

The intelligence cycle is applicable to all intelligence agencies in the world and allows you to solve even the problem that you had no idea about before you ran into it.