Text SMS.

[Детективное агентство Москва]

There’s nothing to add to the discussion ))
I repeat - the SMS archive is stored, but not issued at the request of the subscriber, only through the office.

 

[Anonymous]

Hello Vitas! Tell me which operator?
In general, the texts are stored at the request of the service without. available ...

Hello. Megaphone.

 

[Anonymous]

I don’t know, dear ones, where you served and in which units, but as a person who worked in a unit for special technical events ... I did this a thousand times. But only I will not talk on this topic with a user who has registered on the site today.

I doubt the veracity of the statement if I had served ... This is, after all, open, not private access. Why are you misleading people or did you have all such talkers in UOTM?

 

[Anonymous]

In general, the right to receive information, including SMS, is determined by a standard contract with a mobile operator and is regulated by the federal law "On Communications". Read your contract, if not, take a copy from the operator if the conditions for the provision of information are not written there, read the Law, and I also recommend contacting the territorial office of Rossvyaznadzor with a complaint that your operator does not provide you with your personal information. No need to pay money immediately to anyone. If you yourself cannot attract a professional, issue a notarized power of attorney with the right to receive your personal information, conclude an agreement with him for the provision of such services and wait for the result.

 

[Растаман]

There is an offer! Transfer this topic to semi-private! And then I look here a lot of superfluous, some write.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

There is an offer! Transfer this topic to semi-private! And then I look here a lot of superfluous, some write.

Nail, you are behind the times !!! ........ in recent weeks in all branches, tear apart ) Unless the intelligence reports hang out, about everything !!!!

 

[Anonymous]

There is an offer! Transfer this topic to semi-private! And then I look here a lot of superfluous, some write.

This is a client’s question; one must adequately answer it. Moreover, we are talking about the constitutional right to privacy of correspondence.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

I don’t know, dear ones, where you served and in which units, but as a person who worked in a unit for special technical events ... I did this a thousand times. But only I will not talk on this topic with a user who has registered on the site today.

I doubt the veracity of the statement if I had served ... This is, after all, open, not private access. Why are you misleading people or did you have all such talkers in UOTM?

Andrei, explain to me why or why you called Valery a talker? I think your statement is not correct.

 

[Anonymous]

I don’t know, dear ones, where you served and in which units, but as a person who worked in a unit for special technical events ... I did this a thousand times. But only I will not talk on this topic with a user who has registered on the site today.

I doubt the veracity of the statement if I had served ... This is, after all, open, not private access. Why are you misleading people or did you have all such talkers in UOTM?

Andrei, explain to me why or why you called Valery a talker? I think your statement is not correct.

A man asks for help in obtaining information belonging to him, and not someone else's. I think the statement of Lightning that he did it a thousand times incorrect. Such infa is given only by a court decision and has never been obtained by opera with UOTM, this is a violation of the constitutional right of citizens to privacy of correspondence. My comment is the answer to the client’s question, how to get the correspondence lost by him.

 

[Саратов-Алиби]

...