Text sms

[Арсен]

Dans les structures de pouvoir actuelles, seules les prostituées restent au service

Je m'oppose catégoriquement!
Cette thèse n'est pas seulement controversée, elle est incorrecte par essence, peu convaincante dans sa forme et offensante dans son contenu ...
Je suggère à l'administration du Forum d'utiliser plus activement ses pouvoirs pour freiner ces perles.

Je soutiens!

J'accepte Andrey Nikolaevich! Si j'ai offensé quelqu'un, je m'en excuse sincèrement.

 

[Патрушев Михаил Владимирович]

:! ::! ::!:

Répondre à la question de Mikhail sur les droits BH ... les droits BH que personne "n'ajoutera" ... C'est précisément tout le "truc" ... À notre avis, la "voltige" dans le travail BH consiste à collecter des informations d'intérêt l'absence de "xivy" ... Seulement en utilisant vos compétences personnelles, éventuellement acquises en travaillant dans le "système" et le temps de fonctionnement ... Et en même temps, essayez de ne pas enfreindre la loi ...: lol:

 

[Детективное агентство Москва]

Collègues !!!!
Désolé, je suis tombé un peu tard sur ce sujet obscur.

Tout d'abord, ce sont des événements il y a un an (juillet de l'année dernière) et on ne sait pas pourquoi Konstantin
"excité" en ce moment ... L'affaire n'est pas close depuis longtemps, mais suspendue.

Deuxièmement, je connais bien les «défendeurs» comme des collègues honnêtes et décents qui sont tout à fait dignes
être membres du MOD, que je recommanderai avec plaisir. Soit dit en passant, l'un d'eux était à Lermontovo.
Et le «business» sur eux était principalement basé sur une «configuration» propre, lorsque les deux packs d'étiquettes
factures sur une grosse commande. Je peux vous dire les détails lors de la conférence.

Je propose de ne pas déshonorer des collègues complètement dignes, même dans notre cercle étroit, et encore plus dans le fil de discussion ouvert et
SUPPRIMER IMMÉDIATEMENT CE SUJET !!!

Konstantin! Désolé, mais vous méritez une censure distincte! Lorsque vous publiez des sujets, regardez attentivement la date
événements et par qui sera "accro" à ce sujet.

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Konstantin! Désolé, mais vous méritez une censure distincte! Lorsque vous publiez des sujets, regardez attentivement la date
événements et par qui sera "accro" à ce sujet.

Je ne ferai plus ça. : Oups:

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

: lol:

 

[anya-m]

Please help me understand the situation.
Criminal case under art. 159 part 2, 159 part 2 of the UKRF (Fraud with causing significant damage to citizens by deception AND breach of trust) was completed on Friday. They wrote a refusal to write petitions and on Monday the materials of the case will be submitted to the prosecutor. I would like to have a printout for trial SMS texts suspect-accused, in order to prove the intent and extent of the fraud, confirmation of the threats sent. As part of the criminal case, the investigator did not send such a request. Is it possible to fill out a petition by my lawyer, or is it now only in court to prove the need to provide this information (get it through a court request) or can this information be requested in a statement to the prosecutor’s office, where I ask the district prosecutor to attend the hearing?

Hopefully articulated a train of thought:?

 

[Роберт]

Please help me understand the situation.
Criminal case under art. 159 part 2, 159 part 2 of the UKRF (Fraud with causing significant damage to citizens by deception AND breach of trust) was completed on Friday. They wrote a refusal to write petitions and on Monday the materials of the case will be submitted to the prosecutor. I would like to have a printout for trial SMS texts suspect-accused, in order to prove the intent and scope of the fraud, confirmation of the threats sent. As part of the criminal case, the investigator did not send such a request. Is it possible to fill out a petition by my lawyer, or is it now only in court to prove the need to provide this information (obtain it through a court request) or can this information be requested in a statement to the prosecutor's office, where I ask the district prosecutor to attend the hearing?

Hopefully articulated a train of thought:?

Yes, just a motivated request by a lawyer at the hearing will greatly contribute to the proper resolution of the case. If the lawyer focuses on the fact that this information is crucial for the court to resolve the case. The prosecutor will therefore bring charges in court. If the lawyer writes a petition before the case is sent to court, that’s good too. You need to notify the prosecutor. If he considers that the investigator has not completed something, he will refuse to support the prosecution and the case will be returned to the investigator. Question in time. Maybe all the approvals have already been signed and the case has gone to court.

 

[Детектив-Молдова]

Dear, Anya, you should remember one rule that when considering a case, the court can never go beyond the limits of the charge presented during the preliminary investigation, especially if this aggravates the fate of the defendant.
You had to insist on this petition at the preliminary investigation stage. It is not too late to make this petition to the prosecutor before he has sent the case to court. Go to a higher prosecutor if the supervisor refuses to accept the application.

In fact, the court does not collect evidence, it judges by the evidence that was collected during the investigation and found confirmation during the trial.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

I agree with the respected Nikolai Vasilyevich .... The petitions must be submitted in a timely manner, at the stage of the preliminary investigation ... If such a petition was filed during the investigation, but was rejected, only then it can be re-filed in court ... And that will raise the question - why didn’t they appeal the refusal in accordance with the CCrP ... It seems that even if such a motion is made, the essence of the charge will not be affected and most likely it will be rejected by the court ... (but I say this without knowing all the circumstances of the case ... Details consultation can be given only if you get acquainted with all the materials of the case ... And so, these are just words) ... If there is a lawyer, all questions to the lawyer, who should know all the circumstances of the case, at least ...

 

[Eugen]

Colleagues are not offended, but it’s very impudent to listen to officials from the state apparatus and I think the FSB is not interested in retirement, but in the customer. After all, the work of the detective agency, in my opinion, is the non-disclosure of data about the customer and the first place should be not the pursuit of profit, but the image of the agency. Do not forget that the state has entrusted us with some secrets and its methods of work, and we must remember this. After all, I am sure that each of you was a cadet, lieutenant, excitedly taught OPD and perhaps understood that this is a great confidence of the state.