Everything is correct, Henry))) And the methods, in my opinion, are the same (Naturally, if they do not violate the line of the Law) ... There are a lot of developments in the field of methods for specific actions to collect information, including in the NPV ... However, all of them can be said to be individual (depending on the specific "object" of development) ... However, there are certain patterns ... And this is the activity of the Kyrgyz Republic as an activity in the field of ensuring the security of a particular object on which the Kyrgyz Republic and work A BH that provides services of virtually the same nature, only, roughly speaking, not to a specific employer, but to an "indefinite circle of people" is similar ... The differences probably consist in the fact that based on the level of legitimacy, the Kyrgyz Republic is forced to hide its actions aimed at collecting specific information, not only from the "object" of development, but also from the state ... The BH, in turn, endowed with certain powers (albeit of course quite peculiar, but nevertheless determined by the Federal Law) may not hide to conduct their activities (in matters of the methods of obtaining information specified by the Law) for collecting information from government agencies that control this area ... This, of course, concerns the collection of information, so to speak "on its territory", that is. on the territory of the Russian Federation ... But in any case, thank you for the information that you publish ... By the level of publications it is clear that these are practical developments that can be useful ...