Shocking crimes against children in the Middle Urals

[Eugen]

Victor If it’s painful for you, then I advise you to make a statement, a proposal, a request, officially on paper, to an assistant deputy of a party in Russia. I am sure the deputy will consider and answer you in writing (you choose them). Journalists, people who always chase after a black cat in a dark room, if she is not even there and should not be offended by them.

no, not pent up.
and the government, in principle, has nothing to do with it.
here, you understand, the topic is that they write carelessly, although according to the idea they are taught how not to break firewood (in educational institutions of journalism), conclusions?

Victor You can go to court with the help of a lawyer, with a lawsuit for moral compensation (restoring your honest estate, causing moral suffering to slander you, etc.), material (lawyer's services, doctor's services, and others).

You can go to court with a lawsuit not only against journalists, but even against some statesmen, but do not forget (mutual responsibility, clannishness sometimes the opinion of some figures who committed crimes against you is higher than the law and the prosecutor general’s office)

PS: If every person whose journalists slandered will go to court, then you will very soon notice how much negativity disappears from the pages of newspapers, television and the Internet and there will be real help to law enforcement officials.

 

[Victor]

I agree, this is one of the solutions
but the resource cost of the venture is great, and the effect is illusory ...
I could be wrong.

Yes, you can protect your rights given by the Legislation in the Court, but the Constitution states that no one can encroach on them ...
Not?


And once again, on the other hand, estimate, the journalist is pushing the wrong topic, maybe not assuming this because of not having a political or any other mutually adding-excluding education), and the client spends time and everything else to restore justice (in broad sense of the word). illogical it turns out, it seems like everyone has a passport, they accepted and comply with the Constitution, and Human Rights, too (if not Che), but they don’t consider a little neighbor, a person endowed with common rights.

and in general I am against sharp articles, with sharp slogans,
since they are developing extremism, they cause more negativity in the hearts of citizens than common, far-sighted meaning.

and comrades Colleagues, if it’s easy, write detailed comments,
so the truth will appear faster and more accurately.

 

[Victor]

PS

Does a journalist, or the same politician, have the right to make a free Person of his country, engaged in his beloved and legitimate business - a person bogged down in lawsuits?

I think not.

 

[Детективное агентство Одесса]

It's scary even to read (In the Urals, all the worst (