Text sms

[Арсен]

In the current power structures, only prostitutes remain to serve

I categorically object!
This thesis is not just controversial, it is incorrect in essence, unconvincing in form and offensive in content ...
I suggest that the administration of the Forum more actively use their powers to suppress such pearls.

I support!

I accept Andrey Nikolaevich! If I offended anyone, I sincerely apologize.

 

[Патрушев Михаил Владимирович]

:!::!::!:

Answering Mikhail’s question about BH rights ... BH rights no one will "add" ... This is precisely the whole "trick" ... In our opinion, "aerobatics" in the BH is to collect information of interest the absence of "xivy" ... Only using your personal skills, possibly acquired while working in the "system" and operating time ... And at the same time try not to violate the Law ...: lol:

 

[Детективное агентство Москва]

Colleagues !!!!
Sorry, I stumbled on this obscure topic a bit late.

Firstly, these are events a year ago (July last year) and it is completely unclear why Konstantin
"excited" right now ... The case has not been closed for a long time, but suspended.

Secondly, I well know both “defendants” as decent and honest colleagues who are quite worthy
to be members of the MOD, both of whom I will gladly give a recommendation. One of them, by the way, was in Lermontovo.
And the “business” on them was mainly based on a clean “setup”, when both packs of labeled
banknotes on a large order. I can tell you the details at the conference.

I propose not to dishonor completely worthy colleagues even in our narrow circle, and even more so in the open forum thread and
IMMEDIATELY REMOVE THIS TOPIC !!!

Konstantin ! Sorry, but you deserve a separate censure! When posting topics, look carefully at the date
events and by who will be "hooked" on this.

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Konstantin ! Sorry, but you deserve a separate censure! When posting topics, look carefully at the date
events and by who will be "hooked" on this.

I won’t do that anymore. : oops:

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

:lol:

 

[anya-m]

Please help me understand the situation.
Criminal case under art. 159 part 2, 159 part 2 of the UKRF (Fraud with causing significant damage to citizens by deception AND breach of trust) was completed on Friday. They wrote a refusal to write petitions and on Monday the materials of the case will be submitted to the prosecutor. I would like to have a printout for trial SMS texts suspect-accused, in order to prove the intent and extent of the fraud, confirmation of the threats sent. As part of the criminal case, the investigator did not send such a request. Is it possible to fill out a petition by my lawyer, or is it now only in court to prove the need to provide this information (get it through a court request) or can this information be requested in a statement to the prosecutor’s office, where I ask the district prosecutor to attend the hearing?

Hopefully articulated a train of thought:?

 

[Роберт]

Please help me understand the situation.
Criminal case under art. 159 part 2, 159 part 2 of the UKRF (Fraud with causing significant damage to citizens by deception AND breach of trust) was completed on Friday. They wrote a refusal to write petitions and on Monday the materials of the case will be submitted to the prosecutor. I would like to have a printout for trial SMS texts suspect-accused, in order to prove the intent and scope of the fraud, confirmation of the threats sent. As part of the criminal case, the investigator did not send such a request. Is it possible to fill out a petition by my lawyer, or is it now only in court to prove the need to provide this information (obtain it through a court request) or can this information be requested in a statement to the prosecutor's office, where I ask the district prosecutor to attend the hearing?

Hopefully articulated a train of thought:?

Yes, just a motivated request by a lawyer at the hearing will greatly contribute to the proper resolution of the case. If the lawyer focuses on the fact that this information is crucial for the court to resolve the case. The prosecutor will therefore bring charges in court. If the lawyer writes a petition before the case is sent to court, that’s good too. You need to notify the prosecutor. If he considers that the investigator has not completed something, he will refuse to support the prosecution and the case will be returned to the investigator. Question in time. Maybe all the approvals have already been signed and the case has gone to court.

 

[Детектив-Молдова]

Dear, Anya, you should remember one rule that when considering a case, the court can never go beyond the limits of the charge presented during the preliminary investigation, especially if this aggravates the fate of the defendant.
You had to insist on this petition at the preliminary investigation stage. It is not too late to make this petition to the prosecutor before he has sent the case to court. Go to a higher prosecutor if the supervisor refuses to accept the application.

In fact, the court does not collect evidence, it judges by the evidence that was collected during the investigation and found confirmation during the trial.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

I agree with the respected Nikolai Vasilyevich .... The petitions must be submitted in a timely manner, at the stage of the preliminary investigation ... If such a petition was filed during the investigation, but was rejected, only then it can be re-filed in court ... And that will raise the question - why didn’t they appeal the refusal in accordance with the CCrP ... It seems that even if such a motion is made, the essence of the charge will not be affected and most likely it will be rejected by the court ... (but I say this without knowing all the circumstances of the case ... Details consultation can be given only if you get acquainted with all the materials of the case ... And so, these are just words) ... If there is a lawyer, all questions to the lawyer, who should know all the circumstances of the case, at least ...

 

[Eugen]

Colleagues are not offended, but it’s very impudent to listen to officials from the state apparatus and I think the FSB is not interested in retirement, but in the customer. After all, the work of the detective agency, in my opinion, is the non-disclosure of data about the customer and the first place should be not the pursuit of profit, but the image of the agency. Do not forget that the state has entrusted us with some secrets and its methods of work, and we must remember this. After all, I am sure that each of you was a cadet, lieutenant, excitedly taught OPD and perhaps understood that this is a great confidence of the state.