search or inspection

[Роберт]

And it’s also funny because it’s like a vocal wiretapping of phones .... There is nothing criminal in the case, everything is outside the framework of the CPC. And the people are hiding something to withdraw !!!! Where? What for? To frighten everyone and force criminals to resolve issues with the legal profession even before initiating a criminal case, put pressure on witnesses ....?! I understand in the framework of the law "On Security" well, it’s not up to the praises, you need to run to minimize the damage ..... but why is Nurgalliyev? Weapons to seize illegal? So he has a lot of rights.

 

[Арсен]

Yes, I know everything. : D was fun to listen to your moralizing. There, they figured it out themselves. And the Ministry of Justice in Russia, too, sometimes gives such foams, wow, the Holy Cow also gives me ..... I just didn’t notice the prefix “not” before the word. We have everything behind the scenes, in our systems: D and the instruction is all the same ...... Bad. Why? Yes, because a stupid opera will follow the path of least resistance with this instruction and will fail. Or clever: D will specially fill up for the loot: D The results of the ARD according to the current practice are accepted by the court: D as evidence, if they have the sanction of the court. Well, if correctly legalized. And in court, for example, in St. Petersburg, such cartoons will not work, objects seized in this way may not be recognized as evidence. Our St. Petersburg prosecutor’s office is well aware of this and the indictment itself may not be approved.

You Judges are some saints !!! : lol:

 

[Роберт]

In St. Petersburg, jury trials do not justify.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

But Robert didn’t answer the question (referring to the fact that they themselves figured out) ... Yes, we didn’t understand ... Those who know, do not need to understand ... Who didn’t know, it’s useful .... Just Robert said that it was impossible to conduct this event in a dwelling ... But he didn’t justify his point of view ... Although, in this, too, he probably said something and everything: lol: Why, why, why not ... .As always ... A practitioner, in one word .... And here we are theorists-botanists gathered alone: lol:

 

[Андрей Захаров]

And in general, between us, this is an extremely harmful document provoking operatives to make mistakes in their work, so that later they can be manipulated. In the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Federal Drug Control Service there are a lot of such legal traps. Did hastily and bang excess. An attorney can easily write such complaints immediately after signing the protocol. This, by the way, is a separate topic for those who worked with operas, and who were “fixed” after work. There are many cases.

The fact that such cases (regarding the "fixation" of operas) take place is not a question ... The question is simply the lack of knowledge of some regulatory documents from the same operas, the inability to work (insufficient level of preparation) ... And I probably don’t need to to refer to the incorrectness of some normative acts ... All acts are normal ... You just need to be able to work so that everything is “chiki-farts” And that’s all ... And lawyers write sensibly only when there is something to write. ..And the task of any law enforcement officer is not to give them (the lawyers) such an opportunity And if he gave it, then he himself “received” ... Because of his illiteracy in the same work ... (this is from personal, so to speak, practice ... Himself such "mistakes" did not allow .... Just did not give a reason)

 

[Арсен]

And in general, between us, this is an extremely harmful document provoking operatives to make mistakes in their work, so that later they can be manipulated. In the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Federal Drug Control Service there are a lot of such legal traps. Did hastily and bang excess. An attorney can easily write such complaints immediately after signing the protocol. This, by the way, is a separate topic for those who worked with operas, and who were “fixed” after work. There are many cases.

The fact that such cases (regarding the "fixation" of operas) take place is not a question ... The question is simply the lack of knowledge of some regulatory documents from the same operas, the inability to work (insufficient level of preparation) ... And I probably don’t need to to refer to the incorrectness of some normative acts ... All acts are normal ... You just need to be able to work so that everything is “chiki-farts” And that’s all ... And lawyers write sensibly only when there is something to write. ..And the task of any law enforcement officer is not to give them (the lawyers) such an opportunity And if he gave it, then he himself “received” ... Because of his illiteracy in the same work ... (this is from personal, so to speak, practice ... Himself such "mistakes" did not allow .... Just did not give a reason)

I completely agree, Andrey Valerievich! That's exactly what most of our operas have instead of (chiki-bunches), first (bunches), and then, if
it will turn out (chiki). : lol:

 

[Роберт]

But Robert didn’t answer the question (referring to the fact that they themselves figured out) ... Yes, we didn’t understand ... Those who know, do not need to understand ... Who didn’t know, it’s useful .... Just Robert said that it was impossible to conduct this event in a dwelling ... But he didn’t justify his point of view ... Although, in this, too, he probably said something and everything: lol: Why, why, why not ... .As always ... A practitioner, in one word .... And here we are theorists-botanists gathered alone: lol:

Why should I justify it? Everyone knows the Constitution. Or did someone forget? I don’t understand why I need this instruction to the detective. Am I a common development? Especially police. : D

 

[Андрей Захаров]

I see ... As always, the question remained unanswered .... And rightly, why should the detective know any Laws, by-laws ... Especially police And so good ....

 

[Роберт]

Yes. What for? Better to know the Constitution. You're right.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Yes. What for? Better to know the Constitution. You're right.

Well, that's agreed ...: lol: Who does not want to know anything, he will not know