Werewolves licensed by the Ministry of Internal Affairs: is this possible?

[Детективное агентство. Мангуст. Уфа.]

Bederov has not been at this site for a long time, why involve the MOD in this case and your colleagues in these internal reviews? Understand yourself already, in PMs and emails, why all this personal squabble to others is unclear.

Jacob))) And this is not a "showdown")))) This is a discussion of an article published on the MOD ... And besides this, there is such a thing as an "honest name" of a person ... Of course, you can say anything ... But when they use, especially in the media, obvious slander .... It’s not a matter of personal sorting out .... It’s lighting, so to speak, of the true face of the “slanderer” .... And the fact that Bederov is not on this site ... After all, this is not written for Bederov ... And so that people would know who is who))))) Who is an honest man ... And who is a slanderer ....)))) After all, with these people work for someone ....

I agree with Andrei. And I would redirect the question of Jacob to the one who published the above article on this forum ... which, incidentally, I mentioned earlier ...

 

[samson81]

We continue to not bore and reflect ...


Igor Bederov (CABIS project manager): a frank conversation
Added by Intermonitor.ru on 11/19/2015



Intermonitor: Hello, Igor. Please tell us what is your business? There are many different assumptions, sometimes the most controversial. But what really?



Igor Bederov: Hello. First of all, I am engaged in advising enterprises and individuals on the construction of an integrated system of business and individual security, as well as its individual aspects (trade secrets, security, engineering and technical security, fire, information, economic, personnel and other security).
Secondly, this is informational and analytical support for the activities of enterprises. In other words, the search and analysis of information for making management decisions on the basis of permanent agreements with legal entities.

These are the types of services such as IP that I offer our customers.

Also, on the basis of separate agency agreements, under the CABIS trademark and on our website, I offer the services of other specialized specialists in the security industry. Such a need arises, on the one hand, due to the requirements of our legislation - a number of services are subject to licensing (Private detective activities - NPV, polygraph checking, etc.), and on the other hand, many services are extremely highly specialized, which means that they require special experience and knowledge. No one can be an expert in all areas at once. That is why we use a similar algorithm of work. I note that we offer customers only proven professionals, and our customers never pay for their services above the average market value. Those. receive guaranteed quality at a premium price. It is very important.





Intermonitor: How is CABIS decrypted and why such a name?



Igor Bederov: In order to answer this question, we need to return to the times that were only two years ago. Then the ideological beginning was laid. Despite the fact that our project was just starting its life, I thought for the future. So this abbreviation “CABIS” appeared - “Consulting Agency of Business Intelligence & Safety”, which means “Consulting Agency for Business Intelligence and Security” in Russian.

For the short time that the project exists, we have not yet grown to the Agency with a capital letter, but the abbreviation “CABIS” has taken root. Now I no longer see another brand for my services. Moreover, it is under this brand that we plan to expand our offer and business projects next year. We took place as a company, our brand is recognized among the target audience.




Intermonitor: Is it LLC, JSC or what?



Igor Bederov: CABIS is a PROJECT in the field of security. Initially, the site cabis.umi.ru was a platform where I posted my publications, and where I accumulated various kinds of information that I saw as relevant and useful for my professional field of activity.

The first notes, let's call them like this, were made by me, an employee of the security service of the Metrika construction hypermarket chain, where I ensured the functioning of the security system of two hypermarkets. I got this job right after I was fired from the civil service in the criminal police from the position of senior security officer, which I received after a year of service “in the field”.

Then I continued to write, but on behalf of the head of the security service of Severny Tekstil CJSC, which I worked for 3 years. It was in this position that I faced all the possible security risks that a large business object may encounter. The CJSC was a complex of buildings, office, retail, warehouse, industrial premises and an internal territory with a total size of the average city quarter, which housed both the CJSC’s own business and numerous enterprises of tenant companies. Such an economy I got to work.

In the last year of employment, I began to consider my resource more seriously in terms of making a profit, so now CABIS is an online platform where many security services are offered.

If we talk about the legal side of the issue, then I am an individual entrepreneur, and CABIS is a trademark that is currently undergoing all the appropriate registration procedures with Rospatent. So, according to the results of a preliminary patent information search for compliance with the eligibility criteria on the databases of registered trademarks of the Russian Federation, my trademark can be registered with FIPS, since 70% of matches are not found with other registered trademarks.

So, as an individual entrepreneur, I have the right to offer in addition to my services any services of specialized security professionals (including those subject to licensing) on the basis of an agency agreement under my brand. Among the above-mentioned specialists, private detectives, lawyers, polygraph examiners, premises verification specialists, and IT specialists can be named.





Intermonitor: You have been repeatedly reproached for the fact that your articles on the topic of competitive (business) intelligence indicate insufficient knowledge of the topic. In addition, you were blamed for the fact that strangers there were not even thoughts, but fragments of texts. How can you comment on this?



Igor Bederov: Let us first outline two categories of thinking people, such as theorists and practitioners. I never set a goal to become a theorist in any field of knowledge, because I never found in myself the qualities so necessary for scientists, including the presence of a reflexive type of mind. Moreover, by coincidence of life circumstances, I never had so much time that it takes to develop abstract scientific theoretical thinking. The construction of beautiful and harmonious theories, it seems to me, does not have a strict limit on the time factor, therefore, in view of this circumstance, scientific knowledge is obtained sequentially, with a deep analysis and synthesis of the problem situation.

And as always with me? Practical activity puts forward to me the requirements of a parallel quick grasp of the whole and attention to details where time is limited, the solution is irreversible, and the cost of error is high. I must say, in temperament it is closer to me. It is clear that here we will have a slightly different picture of working with theory.

I am inventing a practical solution, one that seems to me the most suitable in my real life situation. It is clear that when a theorist considers it with the prism of his theory, then much may surprise him. I can only explain this by the variety of life circumstances and conditions that it throws to us. As they say, it was smooth on paper, but forgot about the ravines.

You know, I’m even somewhat uncomfortable because many were looking for a theorist in me. I am a regular practitioner who wrote articles using the findings of recognized theoretical practitioners in this field, and until now it seemed to me normal, because people always borrow knowledge from each other so as not to reinvent the wheel every time. These borrowings have always, I repeat, always been attributed, and in my lectures or conversations the names of the original sources-creators of our specialized field never left my tongue, and the books of these authors on paper never disappeared from the bookshelves.

I do not consider myself to be someone who can and wants to bring something fundamentally new to the theory of specialty, or at least significantly streamline the existing one, and I never insisted that my articles carry the deepest abstract theoretical potential. At the same time, I thank all those who openly, constructively and without unnecessary confrontation pointed out to me my substantial and stylistic flaws. Of course, this situation, along with the comments of colleagues, will be fully taken into account in my subsequent activities in this field. Most likely, later I will only focus on demonstrating my practical achievements, including using the methods of the Kyrgyz Republic, in cases. A number of similar stories of individual cases, in the form of Internet investigations, readers could already meet on my site and in blogs earlier.





Intermonitor: I agree. You have really interesting online investigations. So you think that your conflict with the professional community of competitive intelligence is settled?



Igor Bederov: Honestly, I learned about the existence of such a conflict quite late ... It is difficult to imagine the existence of a conflict if it is not verbalized, and emotions are hidden by distance.

According to my life principles, I see no reason in playing such a guessing game. In relation to the last (and in time, and, I hope, in fact) case, I did not even know that it was necessary to start playing it.

Only one representative of the industry made specific comments to me regarding the flaws and inaccuracies in my work and theoretical considerations. Those. for some time I had no idea what was happening in the minds of individuals. For me, this remains a mystery now, because we are not allowed to read the thoughts of other people. All we can analyze is actions and behavior. We'll see.

It seems to me that I apologized to everyone I could, because I am deeply convinced that it is more effective to prevent a conflict by positive white manipulation than to try to predict the magnitude of the consequences. Incidentally, they, too, are not known to anyone, even to the most “powerful” specialist. Particularly ridiculous are those conflicts that arise due to the misunderstandings generated by the so-called difficulties translating from Russian into Russian.

I must say that this is not a new surprising situation - such difficulties of interpreting texts at a distance have always been and will be, despite the fact that the creators of user interfaces have taken into account the issue of emotional reinforcement of our virtual messages through all kinds of emoticons. Therefore, live communication, even by telephone, along with the location of the interlocutor, is not a one-sided accusation, but a systematic clarification of the positions of the parties, can cure any situation.

I am ready for dialogs with any people, including and those who previously did not distinguish themselves with a good disposition towards me, for one reason or another, but rushed into a whirlpool from the spot up to the routine insults of my professionalism and personality as a whole. I do not translate such behavior into a plane of resentment, but into the question of quality and size of the very person who does this.

I have two small points in my life: the magnitude (scope) of a person’s personality is determined by his attitude towards others, and the second - nothing is able to discredit all human dignities at once, like trying to accuse him of his inability to think.

I am imprisoned for work, goals and achievements, moving forward. With such a worldview position, conflict is the most fruitless form of interaction. Therefore, it is better to increase the field of cooperation, but not confrontation.





Intermonitor: And what is your relationship with private detectives? In Russia, there are at least two large professional associations - ARD and MOD. How do you get along with them?



Igor Bederov: First of all, it should be noted that among detectives there are a large number of experienced professionals. It does not depend on whether they are members of any professional communities or not. For the most part, these are pleasant people and first-class professionals. Communication with them is always interesting and informative.

As for professional detective associations, I have heard about everyone that you mentioned above. Some time ago, I even was an adviser to the president of NP "MOD" (International Association of Detectives). Later, I asked to be relieved of my duties as an adviser due to the fact that I did not have the legal status of a private detective and I never even intended to develop the work directly in that capacity.

If we talk about the topic of my real social activities, now I am a member of the Coordination Council of the NSB (Non-State Security Sphere) and a member of the IPA (International Police Association). In connection with the foregoing, I practically do not support relations with detective associations.

And here is what I would like to once again note. Professionally, we have little contact with private investigation. The customers of our services are, as a rule, legal entities. We provide them with subscription services.

In turn, a private detective (partly by name, but mainly, of course, based on practice) provides services, primarily to private individuals. Even the difference in our target audience determines our relationship.
Nevertheless, as I mentioned earlier, we are ready to provide private detective services (on the basis of separate agency agreements with detectives) and we can provide our clients if the latter have such a need. We try to work comprehensively, therefore, if there is a solvent demand for the services of a private detective, and we have contacts with highly professional private detectives - I believe that God himself ordered this demand to be satisfied, for the benefit of both the client and the detective, and, of course, us.

In general, according to expert estimates, the potential security market is quite capacious, which allows detectives, security services, and consultants to do their job without rushing about with their elbows. If we talk about competitive intelligence services, then it does not have much to do with security, rather related to marketing, management and business analytics.

And finally, speaking of the detective community, it should be noted that there are private investigators in it who do not always behave correctly. There are those who can openly violate the law. We do not work with such and do not recommend working.

Why is this happening? It seems to me that individual detectives, due to the lack of true competitive advantages and an acute shortage of financial resources, begin to invent themselves nonexistent advantages (for example, ascribe an absolute legal right to perform certain services), as well as dumping at prices or even rendering illegal services .

It is one thing when individual representatives of this profession are engaged in such immature affairs, but we do not know. And it’s a completely different matter when, before our eyes, for example, like mushrooms after the rain, special communities grow up, the content of which is nothing but unjustified insults to neighboring industries and demeaning their significance, rinsing the personalities of specialists associated with these industries. Here, all these 16 acts of the Marlezon Ballet are poured from above with sauce-opinion a la "We are legal, you are not, only we can do this, this and this type of service."

So, if we try to demonstrate to the public how their slogans and laws work in practice, we get that information and analytical services to business should be provided not by specialized news agencies, not by enterprise security services and not by consultants, but only by a private investigation. Of course, this is a big mistake. But, fortunately, such an opinion is shared by a very insignificant fraction of detectives. And, as it turned out later, the scale of their activities was exaggerated by them.

In this sense, it seems to me that large public associations of private investigators, due to their authority, information and educational base, should play the role of a kind of regulator of performing discipline in detective activity.





Intermonitor: How are relations with your security consulting colleagues? As far as I understand, this is a separate professional community, although intersecting with the same detectives, for example?



Igor Bederov: I am at a loss to name the FULL professional security consultant communities that currently exist. Since a professional consultant can be a private investigator, and the head of the security service, and a self-taught expert.

A consultant, in my understanding, is a person who is willing to pay for his opinion on certain issues, because they know (or assume, based on authoritative sources) that this opinion is worth the money that is being asked for, that a person will understand the specific problem the client and will find the solution that is specifically for this client, and it is in his situation, will be the most suitable. In any case, this is exactly how I work, and it was due to this approach that I took part in my field of activity.

If you try to define me in some classification, then I can conditionally be attributed to the professional community of security specialists of various enterprises. Because basically we will have similar means and methods of work, and the main difference will only be that I am an entrepreneur and provide the same services under contracts, and not as a full-time unit, thereby realizing the outsourcing model in practice.

We can safely state the presence of a significant number of such entrepreneurs and enterprises that provide consulting and business support services in the field of security.

So my model of doing business is not a unique phenomenon for the market.





Intermonitor: Do I understand correctly that you are an entrepreneur who was looking for the most suitable type of business for himself, sorting out several options in practice, and finally dwelling on consulting in the field of business security? And, since you are a very energetic person, but rather young, this “enumeration of options” didn’t always take place correctly with you (in terms of public positioning) in relation to other market participants - which caused, say, some roughnesses of a subjective nature?



Igor Bederov: I’m not quite ready to agree with your second question-statement. According to my deep inner convictions, such a move is stupid, ineffective and generally unworthy. I never had and never will have desires to rise above everyone by humiliating someone or pointing to someone’s flaws. Such dishonest “victories” do not interest me. I repeat once again that similar methods of positioning - sorry for the tautology, belong to the category of stupid stupidities characteristic of an immature person, not even just a flabby thought. It is unfortunate that some of my publications, representatives of the detective community took EVERYONE on their personal account.

It remains a mystery why market participants, conducting honest entrepreneurial activity, got so upset with an article or phrases where I pointed out the presence of black methods of work by their colleagues? In other words, if this does not apply to you, then why is it so worrying? Why are my modest works capable of so exciting the minds of respectable law-abiding service providers?

However, do not doubt that I have learned. So, for example, henceforth, speaking of violations, I will indicate the specific names of those who maliciously violate the law, so as not to give rise, as I understand it, to the public the effects of a misconception about the whole industry, in this particular case detective.

Believe me, I did not want such a result. Indeed, one of the current laws in life is such that people feel addictive love for negative information, therefore it spreads faster, is discussed with all passion, passed from generation to generation, thereby being remembered almost forever and ever, on its basis, “laws” are mistakenly transferred to everything that the brain pleases. Perhaps the detectives who began to misinterpret all the facts of my biography were afraid of the notoriety, which my article for the whole industry supposedly could generate.

However, as you rightly noted, I am young and active. I study and will always do it. I don’t reach the community of detectives, I didn’t aspire to the ranks of competitive intelligence (I was once listed as just an ordinary participant in the forum of the Community of Practitioners of Competitive Intelligence - SPKR) and I don’t aspire. I am developing my business model. At the moment, in order to resolve all the emerging misunderstandings, I make appropriate changes to my publications, services and website. I try to make such amendments so that they maximally reveal the essence of the activity that I conduct, and at the same time do not raise any doubts about its legality. This is a very time-consuming process and not as smooth as we would like. But I am sure that this will have a positive result even for my potential clients, who will find it easier to navigate when choosing a provider of their services.



Intermonitor: What are your professional plans?



Igor Bederov: In part, they are already formulated-derived in the abbreviation "CABIS". We are steadily moving towards becoming a serious company with a high level of trust. If you outline the short term, I plan to write a book-guide in which I will describe various practical tips for enterprise security services and ordinary citizens, which I worked out in practice. It can be said my self-initiated civic position - to contribute to the awareness of society regarding measures to prevent unlawful acts.

Most recently, I was in talks with the leaders of the Sfitex. Securica - 2015 ″, where I was invited to discuss major changes in the concept of the exhibition. We discussed possible development vectors, outlined the further course of interaction on key issues. If everything goes as we intended, then next year it will be an event of a qualitatively different nature.

I will also continue to give lectures on the cycle of special training for students of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. I admit honestly, it is in these walls that I consistently reveal in full and diversity my practical methods and algorithms for searching through the Internet. I am immensely pleased by the fact that in a year or two my work will be implemented by law enforcement in practice, which means that, perhaps, they will increase the level of detection of crimes using IT-technologies.

If we talk about business, then in the summer of 2016 I plan to launch a production line of certified chilled weapons for private orders. All samples fire blank cartridges and are certified by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, therefore they do not require special licenses for their acquisition.

There is another project, the most important one, on which I am currently working most intensively. I can only say that it will concern cybercrime investigations. My team is replenished with true enthusiastic specialists. And what will come of it, time will tell.



Intermonitor: Thank you for the frank conversation!

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Considering that Yushchuk already interviewed Bederov, we, dear colleagues, should seriously prepare for the fact that Bederov will soon interview Yushchuk and publish it, for example, in the Guardian ...

 

[samson81]

as I understood, “super-scouts” already have their own biased media .... everything is in the best traditions of cinema ..... everyone is played.

 

[samson81]

Guys! I don’t understand .... that the one that the second according to the Unified State Register of Legal Entities and OKVED do not quite have the right to provide services in the field ....
"Investigation and security (74.60)" as far as I understand this activity is subject to licensing
or am I absolutely .....: roll:: roll:: roll: fool)))

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Intermonitor.ru - a media project by Yevgeny Yushchuk, Philip Yudin is his journalistic pseudonym.

 

[samson81]

007 "SPECTRUM" is already at the box office ....

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Intermonitor.ru - a media project by Yevgeny Yushchuk, Philip Yudin is his journalistic pseudonym.

Yushchuk is not only “KR” and “scientist” .... he is the founder of the media, and the editor-in-chief of this media, and the journalist .... Just like a three-headed .... someone .... Jack of all trades .. ..only one thing is not clear, there is such a tariff and qualification guide for the management team, so to speak .. and its requirements are binding .... and according to it the editor-in-chief must have a higher specialized education (at least philological) and at least 5 years of working experience in the media .... And in our case this is not so .... Therefore, it doesn’t work like the “normal people” .... after all, the shoemaker must make boots ... and the pies - pieman...)))))
he’s the same “creator" or "co-creator" and this one .... Maybe someone used these recommendations of the Kyrgyz Republic, which they bring to an indefinite circle of people, in modern conditions ....
According to the laws of the information war

https://topwar.ru/86107-po-zakonam-infor ... voyny.html ... voyny.html
book presentation
https://al-kuzin.livejournal.com/85697.html

Discussion on the forum of the Kyrgyz Republic
https://forum.razved.info/index.php?t=372

https://forum.razved.info/index.php?a=do_print&t=372

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

That envy says in you, Andrey Valerievich!
Yushchuk can interview Bederov, but you can’t ...

 

[Андрей Захаров]

That envy says in you, Andrey Valerievich!
Yushchuk can interview Bederov, but you can’t ...

Exactly)))) And now where without it I don’t really know ....)))) ... Let them take something from themselves .... and give something to themselves ...)) )))) One with a "state-issued certificate" received in 72 hours of paid training that he is a "scout" ... the other is a "former intelligence officer" ... certainly not Russian .... unless of course the service is in The Ministry of Internal Affairs, where he "served", is not long enough, obviously not a "special service" ....))))) They are facing each other))))))) .... Yes, and they have probably the same media .. ..)))) Here, he sent a statement of right of reply to the KEEPER (as required by the Law) .... And in response, silence))))
Moscow, Artamonov str. 16 building 3
The founder of the online magazine "Keeper"
registration number Al No. FS 77 - 26510
E-mail address eka-elit@mail.ru
Director of Elite Personnel Agency LLC
Pavlov Mikhail Yuryevich
IP Zakharov Andrey Valerevich
mailing address, Saransk, Polezhaev St., 22
T.89271807574
Email azahsa@live.ru
STATEMENT
ABOUT PUBLICATION OF AN ANSWER IN THE MEDIA
(in accordance with Article 46 of the Media Law)
November 12, 2015 on the resource of the electronic journal KHARITEL at
[DLMURL] https://www.psj.ru/blog/mdetect/16422.php [/ DLMURL] published on behalf of Igor Bederov
an article entitled "As Detective Zakharov’s Law on NPV Rules." Tags for
Internet search engines: Andrey Zakharov, detective Andrew
zakharov, private investigation, saransk, saransk mordovia detective zakharov, andrey zakharov
detective, security.
This article takes place as an “assessment of certain facts”, which
produced by the author is not objective, not competent, but in principle does not contain
information about the falsity of certain information on the basis of which the author makes
some of its own conclusions, even if not correct. However, the publication clearly contains
false information that is not true and aimed specifically at
achievement of certain goals of the author - the spread of knowingly false
information discrediting the honor and dignity of another person and undermining his business
reputation.
Clearly false, violating the rights and legitimate interests of a citizen are
the following information that is not true, namely.
the author indicates that “Andrey V. Zakharov (TIN 132600412724), according to
own application, has been working as a private detective since 1999 on the basis of
license number 00010 ..... We do not know what Zakharov actually did from 1999 to
2004, because, according to the Federal Tax Service, its legal status is individual
this gentleman designed the entrepreneur only in 2004. Recall that the opening of IP and
subsequent obtaining a license is the basis for starting a private detective
activities. Since the license period for the NPV is 5 years, the license
No. 00010 in 2004 was to expire. Nevertheless, Zakharov until September 2012.
continues to call in publications, advertising, in their prices for detective services
private detective and conduct detective activities, referring to
expired license .... "
Knowingly false information discrediting my honor and dignity and
tarnishing my business reputation as an individual
state-licensed entrepreneur
(activities for the implementation of private investigation) for more than 15 years are
the following information published in the form specifically established by the author
fact - "according to the Federal Tax Service, its legal status as an individual
this gentleman designed the entrepreneur only in 2004. Recall that the opening of IP and
subsequent obtaining a license is the basis for starting a private detective
activities. Since the license period for the NPV is 5 years, the license
No. 00010 in 2004 was to expire. Nevertheless, Zakharov until September 2012.
continues to call in publications, advertising, in their prices for detective services
private detective and conduct detective activities, referring to
expired license .... "
In fact, I'm really doing a private detective
activity, being an individual entrepreneur since 1999, never
interrupted his activities as an individual entrepreneur and I work strictly in accordance with
issued by a license for private detective activity. All these unreliable
information about my activities allegedly carried out without registering a person as
of an individual entrepreneur, especially with reference to the “data of the Federal Tax Service” clearly
undermine my business reputation as an acting private investigator and
are, in principle, direct accusations of having committed offenses (like
minimum-implementation of entrepreneurial activity without state
registration or without special permission (Art. 14.1 Administrative Code))
On the apparent falsity of information published regarding my implementation
entrepreneurial activity from 1999 to 2004, allegedly without
registration as an individual entrepreneur may indicate
following:
- Availability of a copy of the state registration certificate
an entrepreneur operating without legal
person number 221 dated June 24, 1999 issued by the deputy head of administration
Leninsky district of Saransk V.A. Vedyashkin. In accordance with the data
I am registered as an entrepreneur without education
legal entity June 23, 1999 and carry out private detective
licensed activities. In 1999, there was a slightly different
of the present system of registration of individual entrepreneurs. Original
This certificate was submitted by me to the tax office when introduced in 2004
year of the new registration system and should be located at the Federal Tax Service Inspectorate for the Leninsky District
Saransk, which issued to me in exchange for this certificate a certificate of entry into
USRIP records of an individual entrepreneur registered before 01
January 2004. This certificate was issued to me by the IMNS for the Leninsky district
Saransk, December 16, 2004. It also has a note on my presence
registration as an entrepreneur in 1999 with reference to details previously
certificate issued to me. Based on this circumstance, the Federal Tax Service has
information confirming the fact of my entrepreneurial
activities since 1999. Based on the foregoing, we can conclude -
direct statement by the author of the article that “according to the Federal Tax Service, its legal
this gentleman registered the status of an individual entrepreneur only in 2004. "
It is clearly false information (slander).
On the apparent falsity of information published regarding what the author indicated, and
namely: “Recall that the opening of the IP and the subsequent obtaining of a license is
basis for starting private detective work. Since the validity period
license for NPV is 5 years, then license No. 00010 in 2004 should
expire. Nevertheless, Zakharov continues until September 2012 to
publications, advertising, in their price lists for detective
services call yourself a private detective and conduct a detective
activity, citing an expired license .... "
following:
-The presence of a license of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Moldova for the implementation of a private detective (detective)
activity No. 2 No. 001162 of June 16, 1999 issued in exchange for license No. 000010
based on the application for renewal of the license dated March 29, 2013.
it should be noted that the license for private detective work
it was renewed several times in the prescribed manner. And at the same time until March 29, 2013
its number has not changed. License No. 000010 has not been suspended or
ceased. And moreover, it (the license) was never "expired".
Thus, the author’s direct statement that “Nevertheless, Zakharov up to
September 2012 continues in publications, advertising, in its price lists for detective
services call yourself a private detective and conduct detective activities,
referring to an expired license .... "is clearly false information
(slanderous), also undermining my business reputation as an entrepreneur and
acting in accordance with the law of a private detective.
in view of the fact that the author is publishing clearly false information (slander)
actually accuses me of committing offenses (at least in
private detective work without special permission
(licenses) (Article 20.16 Administrative Code of the Russian Federation).
Further, among the clearly false (libelous) information published
author, we can attribute the following statement, formulated in several
proposals: “The main activity of IP (private investigator) Zakharov
Andrei Valerievich, according to the service Kontur-Focus, is: OKVED 74.11 -
"Activities in the field of law." At the same time, the activities of a private detective in
OKVED is designated by the following OKVED code: 74.60 - "Investigations and
security ". This activity, in accordance with the Law" On Private
detective and security activities, "should be fundamental to
individual entrepreneur-detective. In other words, if you believe
Contour Focus data, and they are directly obtained from computer
database of the Federal Tax Service, it turns out that Andrew
Zakharov has no right to be a private detective, because view
OKVED 74.60 is not its main source
income.
By the way, article 7. Restrictions in the field of activity of a private detective. RF law
from 11.03.1992 N 2487-1 (as amended on 07/13/2015) "On the private detective and security
activities in the Russian Federation "states that:" Detective activity
should be the main activity of a private detective "...."
To obviously defamatory, untrue information
the above information can be attributed based on the following.
-Service "Kontur-Focus" does not apply to official information resources, but
is a part, commercial resource. Among the official, having
reliable information refers to the resource of the Federal Tax Service located on the Internet
the address Providing information from the register / EGRIP . This resource contains reliable information.
about individual entrepreneurs and legal entities, which any
anyone can get free of charge in the form of an extract from the USRIP (USRLE).
these extracts also contain the information that is available
Federal Tax Service, including information indicated by the author of the article. And on the availability of this
official resource of the Federal Tax Service, from which official information can be obtained
The Federal Tax Service, the author of the article, I am sure, knows. And these data are from an official source
clearly do not correspond to the information referred to by the author of the article.
In accordance with Article 46 of the Law on Media “Citizen or organization, in relation to
which the media disseminated information not
Relevant or infringing upon rights and legitimate interests
citizen, have the right to an answer (comment, remark) in the same medium
information. ”
Based on the fact that in relation to me by the author Bederov Igor in
Media by publishing the above article disseminated information that is not
true and undermining my business reputation as
citizen legally carrying out entrepreneurial
I, taking advantage of my right under Article 46 of the Law on
Media, please post my answer on the same resource in an electronic journal
KEEPER on which the above article of Igor Bederov is published.
Please publish if possible within 24 hours after receiving
of this appeal by e-mail, putting tags under this answer for
Search Systems: Bederov Igor Sergeevich, hips
igor, intelligence, CABIS, security, Andrey Zakharov, detective Andrew
zakharov, private investigation, saransk, saransk mordovia detective zakharov, andrey zakharov
detective. Please notify me of the publication publication
azahsa@live.ru by specifying a link to the publication.
In confirmation of the inaccuracy of the information published by Beder Igor
I provide the editors with copies of the following documents:
1. copy of state registration certificate
an entrepreneur carrying out his activities without education
legal entity No. 221 dated June 24, 1999.
2. certificate of entry into the Unified Register of Entrepreneurs
registered before January 01, 2004. This certificate was issued
IMNS for the Leninsky district of Saransk on December 16, 2004. It also
there is a mark about my registration as an entrepreneur in
1999 with reference to the details of the certificate previously issued to me.
3. license of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Moldova for the implementation of a private detective (detective)
Activity No. 2 No. 001162 of June 16, 1999
4. copy of license No. 000010 with a copy of the application for a license exchange in 2013
5. extract from the USRIP received from the Federal Tax Service at the address Providing information from the register / EGRIP
In case of refusal to publish the ANSWER, please inform me about this in
writing email azahsa@live.ru as well as sending me
written notice of this at the address: Saransk, Polezhaev St., 22, indicating
motivation for refusing to publish a response, as well as reporting this at t. 89271807574.
ANSWER TO BE PUBLISHED:
"How Bederov collected information .....
November 12, 2015 on the page of the electronic journal KHARITEL at
[DLMURL] https://www.psj.ru/blog/mdetect/16422.php [/ DLMURL] published on behalf of Igor Bederov
an article entitled "As Detective Zakharov the rules on NPV rules"
This article takes place as an “assessment of certain facts”, which
produced by the author is not objective, not competent, but in principle does not contain
information about the falsity of certain information on the basis of which the author makes
some of their own, even if incorrect, contradictory conclusions. However, in the publication
there are clearly false information regarding my work as an individual
an entrepreneur engaged in state-licensed activities is not
corresponding to reality and probably aimed precisely at achieving
certain goals of the author - the dissemination of knowingly false information defaming
honor and dignity of another person and undermining his business reputation.
In fact, I carry out private detective work, being
individual entrepreneur since 1999, never interrupted his
activities as an individual entrepreneur and I work strictly in accordance with the issued license for
private detective activity. All obviously not reliable information that I supposedly
ever since 1999 to the present worked as a private detective without
registration as an individual entrepreneur, and also used when
doing business “expired license” is not
correspond to reality. Claiming the opposite Igor Bederov, who published
this article, just for some reason, though it’s not clear which one, I decided
probably (I can’t say for sure ... I need to ask the author himself) somehow
"Reproach" me with dishonesty or something .... Although there are no "facts" exactly
"Unfair" attitude of me as a business entity
to work, neither Bederov, nor anyone has and cannot have ... Maybe it’s like
the publication appeared for reasons of "revenge" for the earlier "criticism" of him
work and he decided to disseminate such obviously false information about
me ... It’s not known exactly .... However, this may mean one more thing - he just couldn’t
collect reliable information .... Due to the fact that he just probably can not
collect .... In the editorial office of the electronic journal Keeper there are directed
I have copies of documents that completely refute the information specified in the article
Bederov Igor .. And let him-Igor Bederov everything will be fine ... To each his own
the road, someone just honestly work .... and someone distribute unreliable
information .... and live with it .....
Private detective Zakharov Andrey Valerievich "
Appendix to the statement on the publication of the response:
1. copy of state registration certificate
an entrepreneur carrying out his activities without education
legal entity No. 221 dated June 24, 1999.
2. certificate of making a record of individual
an entrepreneur registered before January 01, 2004. This
The certificate was issued to me by the IMNS in the Leninsky district of Saransk 16
December 2004
3. license of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Moldova for the implementation of a private detective (detective)
Activity No. 2 No. 001162 of June 16, 1999
4.copy of license No. 000010 with a copy of the application for a license exchange in 2013
5. extract from the USRIP received from the service of the Federal Tax Service
Individual entrepreneur Zakharov A.V.
November 16, 2015