Hidden camera

[Саратов-Алиби]

Hello. I'm extremely interested in detective work. Such a question interests me: how legal is it to use a hidden camera in outdoor surveillance, where can I get it and can I use video recordings in court?
Nikolay.

Nikolay, where did you get such terms as "outdoor surveillance", "hidden camera" ??? ....... maybe a little about yourself? ...

"Young, she was not young! (12Stulyev, Ilf and Petrov), and here, probably, the beginner is far from a beginner ...........

 

[Детективное агентство Москва.]

Dear Colleagues!
Suffer until October of this year.
All these and other issues on the topic of NN will be comprehensively and efficiently covered in Sevastopol. [/quote]

Kostya, you are intriguing! already starting to think how to send everything and arrive, although ....., I’m closer to Tula.

 

[Детективное агентство. Москва. Арбат.]

Colleagues, let's be calmer. The man asked a question, he was clearly answered, why then cross among themselves? It is not at all necessary that a person had back thoughts, although, as correctly noted, a "beginner" cannot know the term "NN". There can be only one answer - observing a person without his consent is forbidden, video recording, too, is the point.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Colleagues, let's be calmer. The man asked a question, he was clearly answered, why then cross among themselves? It is not at all necessary that a person had back thoughts, although, as correctly noted, a "beginner" cannot know the term "NN". There can be only one answer - observing a person without his consent is forbidden, video recording, too, is the point.

+3

 

[ДНК]

??????

 

[ДНК]

I disagree with many here .... and here's why:
1. observation (I am not talking about the outside, but the outside is part of the observation), so observation is permitted by Art. 5 of the law .... what does the law say simply "observation to obtain the necessary information in order to provide services ...." further, for example, I entered into an agreement with a client to identify the fact of disclosure of trade secrets by one of my client’s alleged employees .. ..in order to fulfill the contract, I carry out a type of detective activity that is permitted to me - monitoring the alleged “disclosure” of secrets, which leaves the office at lunchtime and goes to a summer, open cafe, where it meets one of the competitors of the client company and gives it a bundle. ..or a flash drive .... according to Art. 5 of the same law (On MF&D) I am allowed to quote: "in the implementation of private detective activities, the use of video and audio recordings, films and photo shoots ... that are not harmful to life, health, the environment ..." ... i.e. . if I monitor the alleged "divulger" of trade secrets and fix it on a camera or camcorder from my car, how he meets a person and passes him something and later it turns out that this is a client’s competitor ..... what I committed a violation of applicable law ??? no ..... these are of course general words and methods and it will differ or adapt to the individual characteristics of the client and the order ... but in general terms, it is possible to conduct monitoring, to record on the video of the observed object is also not prohibited .... (not you have to be wise here about encrypted video shooting - after all, a video camera in a man purse is also not a prohibited special tool) ...
2. if I got information about the meeting of the alleged disclosure with the competitor, and then, at my prompt, the client himself found the contact with the competitor in the electronic correspondence (on the work computer) of the disclosure and pressed him against the wall, he received confirmation of the disclosure of the secret from him .... why my client and I cannot speak in court and give such evidence if all our actions were carried out in accordance with the law ... that is, using the fact of observation and video recording in court (subject to a number of conditions specified by me) is not prohibited by law .. .

 

[Детективное агентство Москва.]

Dima, I completely agree with you, you just have to properly arrange yourself. As well as wiretapping - ah, how not good, it is IMPOSSIBLE !!! BUT in office premises, for example office telephones, with the permission of the leadership it is possible.

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

I disagree with many here .... and here's why:
1. observation (I am not talking about the outside, but the outside is part of the observation), so observation is permitted by Art. 5 of the law .... what does the law say simply "observation to obtain the necessary information in order to provide services ...." further, for example, I entered into an agreement with a client to identify the fact of disclosure of trade secrets by one of my client’s alleged employees .. ..in order to fulfill the contract, I carry out a type of detective activity that is permitted to me - monitoring the alleged “disclosure” of secrets, which leaves the office at lunchtime and goes to a summer, open cafe, where it meets one of the competitors of the client company and gives it a bundle. ..or a flash drive .... according to Art. 5 of the same law (On MF&D) I am allowed to quote: "in the implementation of private detective activities, the use of video and audio recordings, films and photo shoots ... that are not harmful to life, health, the environment ..." ... i.e. . if I monitor the alleged "divulger" of trade secrets and fix it on a camera or camcorder from my car, how he meets a person and passes him something and later it turns out that this is a client’s competitor ..... what I committed a violation of applicable law ??? no ..... these are of course general words and methods and it will differ or adapt to the individual characteristics of the client and the order ... but in general terms, it is possible to conduct monitoring, to record on the video of the observed object is also not prohibited .... (not you have to be wise here about encrypted video shooting - after all, a video camera in a man purse is also not a prohibited special tool) ...
2. if I got information about the meeting of the alleged disclosure with the competitor, and then, at my prompt, the client himself found the contact with the competitor in the electronic correspondence (on the work computer) of the disclosure and pressed him against the wall, he received confirmation of the disclosure of the secret from him .... why my client and I cannot speak in court and give such evidence if all our actions were carried out in accordance with the law ... that is, using the fact of observation and video recording in court (subject to a number of conditions specified by me) is not prohibited by law .. .

Dima +5. Thank.

 

[Частный детектив Севастополь ОДБ]

You can go one after another as you like, anyone, anywhere. Shooting on your personal camera in public places is the same. So it’s good for your health. But external surveillance and covert photo-audio recording (or in other words, documentation) in premises owned by other persons is already an operational-search activity and is the prerogative of exclusively law enforcement agencies with which we are friends and closely interact on exclusively legal grounds.

 

[Роберт]

Use, gentlemen, on health. Until you get caught! : D