IAPD Temsilcisi lisanslı bir dedektiftir.

[Гудимов Анатолий Геннадиевич]

In principle, in order to avoid any misunderstandings with the tax authorities and “misunderstandings” during the implementation of the NPV, under the agreement between the private detective and the NP, it is possible to work according to the following option.
NP, realizing the capabilities of its information resources in accordance with the Charter (clause 2.2), carries out activities to develop the market of detective services, as well as providing consumers with them, which will be expressed in the selection of potential customers who need licensed BH services. Received orders are forwarded to a specific BH which, concluding an appropriate contract for the provision of services, executes an order, receives an appropriate fee from the client and transfers part of this fee as a “voluntary donation” to the account of a non-commercial partnership (in accordance with clause 6.6 of the Charter). However, it is not possible to oblige the IP-licensed BH in accordance with any agreements or contracts to transfer these funds specifically as “voluntary donations.” When such a contract is concluded, the contract will be considered void due to the fact that the transfer of such “donations” implies precisely voluntariness of their contribution. Thus, by concluding agreements on cooperation with a particular BH, in such agreements it is possible to stipulate only the fact of non-repayable transfer by the NP of a particular BH to information about persons who need to provide BH services. In this case, the payment of any black money by this BH to the NP account will be possible only in the form of a “voluntary donation”, which does not guarantee the fact of its payment. However, this scheme, in the presence of a trusting relationship between NP and BH, is quite possible and acceptable.
On the issue of paying taxes, when implementing this scheme, there are also no questions if BH uses STS.
Other forms of cooperation between the NP and a specific IP-BH for profit generation will probably be quite troublesome ... But this is only a personal opinion ...

Thanks for working through the question!

 

[Андрей Захаров]

What can I do, as they say .... It also seems that a similar practice can be introduced among all PM NPs in the case of receipt and implementation of an order from a non-profit partnership (not from colleague to colleague, but from partnership) ... I have for example, there is a practice for “adjusting” an order — 10% of the amount of advance payments for an order ... If you apply this practice for 10% —thinks, it will not “strangle anyone” and help in the formation of partnership funds .... For account of voluntary donations ... You can put this issue into discussion with colleagues ... At the discretion of the leadership of the partnership ...