Detego' Alıntı:
Andrey, now I really don’t understand. How to establish the “location of the car” —that is, to search for property — without an agreement with the plaintiff (or his lawyer). I really wonder. This is a whole substantive conversation on which you can write a technique. I am not ironic if that:?
respectfully
Alexander
Why without a contract ... there is a contract .... I participated in the case as a representative of the plaintiff .... during the process this problem arose .... I collected information on a civil case on the basis of the contract ... I found a typewriter .. .. informed the plaintiff about this in the report to the customer ... then, together with the plaintiff and another witness, went to the location of the vehicle, where I and the witness took photographs of this vehicle with reference to the location .... the photo was framed by tables with signatures the participants (me, the plaintiff, the witness) .... after that, the court filed a written request for the interrogation of the witness, who was present when fixing the location of the vehicle and attaching photo tables to the case with the signatures of the participants described above .... and that’s it ... the court questioned the witness .... attached photographic tables to the case (As documents). made a decision .... we did not raise the question of compensation for court costs in court ... although it could theoretically be raised ... just the defendant admitted after our “body movements” lawsuit that expedited about the time of consideration of our claims ... the issue of compensation was not raised in connection with the agreement with the defendant .... compromise damn