I apologize to everyone for the delay (I continue to hurt me vilely), but I fulfill the promise ..
“AGREED” “AGREED”
Director Manager
"____" _________ 2012 "____" ___________ 2012
“I affirm”
Director of Development
LLC ChOP
"____" ____________ 2012
INSTRUCTION
on conducting an inspection, restricting the free movement of an object of violators of the access or intraobjective regime
and registration of the fact of violation
on LLC _________
These instructions are developed in accordance with the requirements of the internal labor regulations established for employees of LLC ______ branch in Perm hereinafter referred to as the "Enterprise".
1. Restriction of free movement - this is a temporary restriction of freedom of movement across the territory of the object of the violator of the access or internal regime established at the enterprise for the period necessary for the preparation of documents fixing the violation.
2. Temporary detention - this is a temporary restriction on the freedom of movement of the offender until the arrival of police officers in the event of a criminal offense or administrative offense in the territory of the facility.
3. Restrictions on free movement may be subject to both employees of the "Enterprise" and employees of third-party organizations and visitors.
4. Employees of the private security company ____ private security company "Enterprises" have the right to temporarily restrict in free movement:
4.1. persons trying to unauthorized transfer from the guarded object any material values, or in the behavior of which there are signs giving the security officer reason to believe that they are preparing to commit or have performed these actions.
4.2. persons with clear signs of alcohol or drug (toxic) intoxication.
4.3. persons violating access and intraobjective regime.
The fact of restriction of free movement is drawn up by an act on violation of the requirements of access control or intra-facility regimes (Appendix No. 1).
5. In order to ensure the safety of the property of the “Enterprise”, to prevent the entry into the territory of the “Enterprise” of prohibited items, security officers have the right to inspect the deposited / removed property and hand luggage. Inspection can be subjected to both employees of the "Enterprise", as well as employees of third parties and visitors.
6. Security officers have the right to prevent a person who refuses to voluntarily present the property to be inspected on the territory of the “Enterprise”.
7. The basis for a personal inspection may be the presence of the following facts or signs:
7.1. When a person is caught at the moment of unauthorized transfer of material assets outside the protected territory, or immediately after the performance of these actions.
7.2. When there are direct or indirect signs, in the form of traces on clothes, an unnatural gait, a disproportionate figure, etc., giving reason to believe about an attempt to commit unauthorized removal of material values outside the protected territory.
7.3. When eyewitnesses directly point to a specific person who has committed unauthorized movement of material assets outside the protected territory.
7.4. In cases of violation of access control.
7.5. In the presence of indications of technical means of control, etc.
8. A personal examination is carried out in a closed room for examination by a person of the same sex as the person being examined.
9. The procedure for personal inspection:
9.1. Before conducting a personal inspection, a security officer invites at least two witnesses of the same gender with the person being examined. A personal inspection is carried out only in the presence of witnesses.
9.2. The inspector suggests that the inspector voluntarily present the contents of wearable personal items (briefcases, bags, etc.), show the contents of the pockets of clothing. Regardless of the results of the inspection, an inspection certificate (Appendix No. 2) is drawn up in 2 copies. The act is signed by the inspector, witnesses and the inspected.
10. In case of refusal of the person undergoing inspection to voluntarily present things for inspection, the shift supervisor calls the representative of the management of the department (workshop) where the inspected person works and in his presence draws up an act of refusal to conduct the inspection (Appendix No. 3). The act is signed by the representative of the management of the department (workshop), the senior shift guard, witnesses and inspected. Further, the act is transferred to the management of the "Enterprise" to make a decision on this fact.
11. During the inspection, the guard is prohibited:
11.1. Inspect without the voluntary consent of the person being inspected temporarily.
11.2. Personally inspect the contents of pockets of clothing, personal items being inspected and hand luggage.
12. In the event that the person being examined has material values belonging to the "Enterprise", the security officer must:
12.1. Call a representative of the management of the department (workshop) where the person being examined works.
12.2. To draw up an act of seizure of material assets, indicating the date, full name the inspected person, his personnel number, workshop, or the name of the organization where the inspected person works, the detailed results of the inspection — the number, weight, date of development, other distinguishing features, take a written explanation of the person who has been examined.
13. The act is signed:
13.1. The security officer who drew up the act.
13.2. A representative of the management of the department (workshop) where the temporarily detained person works.
13.3. Present during a personal examination by witnesses.
13.4. The person being examined.
13.4.1. In case of refusal of the inspected person from signing the act and giving explanations, the mark “Full name refused to sign and give an explanation. ” This record is certified by the signature of the security officer who carried out the inspection and witnesses.
14. If material values are discovered, the inspection certificate is drawn up in 3 copies, which are transmitted:
14.1. Guide "Enterprise" for decision.
14.2. To the laboratory of the "Enterprise".
14.3. ChOP management.
14.3.1. The seized material assets with the act of seizure are transferred to the "Enterprises" laboratory for analysis no later than the end of the shift of the security officer.
15. If there is a restriction in the freedom of movement of a person with obvious signs of alcohol or drug intoxication, security guards must:
15.1. Report to the senior shift on the fact of restriction of free movement of the face. The shift supervisor is required to deliver the person suspected of being intoxicated to the Enterprise medical center for his medical examination.
15.2. The shift supervisor informs the head of the workshop (department, warehouse) about the fact of restriction on the free movement of his subordinate and invites him to come, or send his representative, to the "Enterprise" medical center and be present at the examination.
15.3. The shift supervisor, in the presence of at least two witnesses, draws up an act on violation of the requirements of the access or intra-facility regimes (Appendix No. 1) indicating the date and time of the violation, full name the offender, his personnel number, workshop, or the name of the organization where he works, and also summarizes his oral explanations.
15.4. The shift supervisor must attach a copy of the protocol of the medical examination from the "Enterprise" medical center to the act.
15.5. In case of refusal of a person suspected of being intoxicated from examination in a medical center of the enterprise, conclusions about intoxication are made on the basis of external evidence based on witness testimony (at least 3 people) about which a note is made in the act. The pass from the violator is seized, and he is expelled from the territory of the enterprise.
16. The act of violation is drawn up regardless of the results of the examination in 2 copies, which are transmitted:
16.1. The management of the "Enterprise"
16.2. ChOP management.
17. Next, a person who is intoxicated is transferred to the representative of the workshop (department, warehouse) where he works, for his further medical examination at a drug treatment clinic and making a decision on suspension from work.
17.1. In the case of a positive result of the examination in the medical center of the “Enterprise” and disagreement with it, the person subjected to the examination is obliged, no later than 1 hour from the time of the examination in the medical center of the enterprise, to be examined in a narcological clinic in order to obtain objective information.
17.2. In case of refusal of a person suspected of being intoxicated from an examination in a narcological dispensary, an appropriate entry in the act of detention shall be made about this.
18. Security officers do not have the right to disclose information about persons subjected to restrictions on free movement, as well as the results of an examination or medical examination and facts, restrictions on free movement to unauthorized persons.
19. Security officers conducting an inspection of persons, their personal belongings and hand luggage, as well as personal inspection, must be correct and polite in relation to the person being examined, not to allow actions that degrade their personal dignity, damage to personal property and clothing. In case of negative inspection results, apologize.
20. Physical force and special means are used strictly in accordance with Art. 17 of the Law on Private Security and Detective Activities of the Russian Federation. The unlawful use of physical force and special means entails liability provided for by the current legislation of the Russian Federation.
Head of security
"AGREED"
Access administrator
LTD "
и всем раздам...
