Who has a specific experience - here

[Детективное агентство Тула]

Well, the fact that we, Helen, from you will never receive an act (protocol) of examination is understandable. However, the ownership form of your organization - LLC is somehow unpleasantly alarming ... Responsibility if, God forbid, what do you bear within the authorized capital? 10 000 rubles, if sclerosis doesn’t fail me ...

Konstantin, excuse me, but I don’t understand why you will never get the expertise from me. Please explain what you mean.
And what type of ownership does your organization belong to?

I will eagerly explain my sluggish wandering thought, Helen.
At the time of my youth, an examination was appointed as part of a criminal case based on a reasoned decision of an investigator, prosecutor, or court. Expert research, as a rule, was carried out according to a reasoned decision of the head of the body of inquiry, just to initiate a criminal case or to issue a decision to refuse to institute such. As far as I am familiar with the current legislation, the institute of private detective and his representatives in the form individual entrepreneur (IP) do not apply to the procedural persons indicated by me above. Or am I very old and missed something important?

 

[@InfoPoisk]

In the process, BH may represent one of the parties. An application for the appointment of an examination in this case is possible with the consent of the person conducting the inquiry (investigation), in addition, it is possible to conduct an examination and, independently, an expert opinion. So Helen can be an expert.
Helen needed to explain the mechanism for appointing a specific expert. And even if possible, Helen knows where specific examinations are carried out, that is, only in a particular organization.

 

[Элен]

I will eagerly explain my sluggish wandering thought, Helen.
At the time of my youth, an examination was appointed as part of a criminal case based on a reasoned decision of an investigator, prosecutor, or court. Expert research, as a rule, was carried out according to a reasoned decision of the head of the body of inquiry, just to initiate a criminal case or to issue a decision to refuse to institute such. As far as I am familiar with the current legislation, the institute of private detective and his representatives in the form individual entrepreneur (IP) do not apply to the procedural persons indicated by me above. Or am I very old and missed something important?

Konstantin, currently the examination is appointed in a similar way: as part of a criminal investigation - by order of the investigator; at the stage of consideration of the case in court - at the request of the prosecutor, the parties, on the basis of a court ruling. In the case of a civil case - its nuances that are not relevant to the essence of the matter.
At the same time, it is not forbidden to conduct independent research at the request of a citizen or his representative (for example, I did research on a lawyer's request). Such studies with a competent approach can subsequently be used in court. It is also not forbidden to petition the court (investigator) for an additional or repeated examination (again, there was a case when I conducted a second phonoscopic examination at the stage of the investigation of a criminal case).
So do not rush to delete me from the list of your contacts - suddenly I’ll come in handy

 

[Детективное агентство. Украина. Харьков. Львов.]

I will eagerly explain my sluggish wandering thought, Helen.
At the time of my youth, an examination was appointed as part of a criminal case based on a reasoned decision of an investigator, prosecutor, or court. Expert research, as a rule, was carried out according to a reasoned decision of the head of the body of inquiry, just to initiate a criminal case or to issue a decision to refuse to institute such. As far as I am familiar with the current legislation, the institute of private detective and his representatives in the form individual entrepreneur (IP) do not apply to the procedural persons indicated by me above. Or am I very old and missed something important?

Konstantin, currently the examination is appointed in a similar way: as part of a criminal investigation - by order of the investigator; at the stage of consideration of the case in court - at the request of the prosecutor, the parties, on the basis of a court ruling. In the case of a civil case - its nuances that are not relevant to the essence of the matter.
At the same time, it is not forbidden to conduct independent research at the request of a citizen or his representative (for example, I did research on a lawyer's request). Such studies with a competent approach can subsequently be used in court. It is also not forbidden to petition the court (investigator) for an additional or repeated examination (again, there was a case when I conducted a second phonoscopic examination at the stage of the investigation of a criminal case).
So do not rush to delete me from the list of your contacts - suddenly I’ll come in handy

We in Ukraine are working on the same expertise. )))

 

[Элен]

In the process, BH may represent one of the parties. An application for the appointment of an examination in this case is possible with the consent of the person conducting the inquiry (investigation), in addition, it is possible to conduct an examination and, independently, an expert opinion. So Helen can be an expert.
Helen needed to explain the mechanism for appointing a specific expert. And even if possible, Helen knows where specific examinations are carried out, that is, only in a particular organization.

Argus, welcome! We think in one direction
The mechanism for appointing "a specific expert" is quite simple: the expert is indicated in the application, which is accepted or rejected by the court (investigator). If the court (investigator) accepts the application, the expert automatically falls into the determination (decision), on the basis of which the examination is carried out.
Regarding specific examinations, it’s more difficult. That's why they are specific! : D Cases are very different.

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

I will eagerly explain my sluggish wandering thought, Helen.
At the time of my youth, an examination was appointed as part of a criminal case based on a reasoned decision of an investigator, prosecutor, or court. Expert research, as a rule, was carried out according to a reasoned decision of the head of the body of inquiry, just to initiate a criminal case or to issue a decision to refuse to institute such. As far as I am familiar with the current legislation, the institute of private detective and his representatives in the form individual entrepreneur (IP) do not apply to the procedural persons indicated by me above. Or am I very old and missed something important?

Konstantin, currently the examination is appointed in a similar way: as part of a criminal investigation - by order of the investigator; at the stage of consideration of the case in court - at the request of the prosecutor, the parties, on the basis of a court ruling. In the case of a civil case - its nuances that are not relevant to the essence of the matter.
At the same time, it is not forbidden to conduct independent research at the request of a citizen or his representative (for example, I did research on a lawyer's request). Such studies with a competent approach can subsequently be used in court. It is also not forbidden to petition the court (investigator) for an additional or repeated examination (again, there was a case when I conducted a second phonoscopic examination at the stage of the investigation of a criminal case).
So do not rush to delete me from the list of your contacts - suddenly I’ll come in handy

Of course, come in handy; we won’t delete you from contacts, even the second time we will circle your phone and address !!! Unfortunately, we (private investigators) - very often - are not lawyers, so we cannot represent anyone in the process ourselves ...
I agree, however, there is something to think about!

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

In the process, BH may represent one of the parties. An application for the appointment of an examination in this case is possible with the consent of the person conducting the inquiry (investigation), in addition, it is possible to conduct an examination and, independently, an expert opinion. So Helen can be an expert.
Helen needed to explain the mechanism for appointing a specific expert. And even if possible, Helen knows where specific examinations are carried out, that is, only in a particular organization.

Please clarify, colleague, in whose capacity we can represent one of the parties and in what process (civil or criminal). The Criminal Procedure Code does not give us much opportunity to roam around! With live lawyers, we can only provide operational support for their activities ...: oops:

 

[@InfoPoisk]

Please clarify, colleague, in whose capacity we can represent one of the parties and in what process (civil or criminal). The Criminal Procedure Code does not give us much opportunity to roam around! With live lawyers, we can only provide operational support for their activities ...: oops:

And to be a representative in a civil proceeding? : o

 

[Детективное агентство Тула]

In civil proceedings, the problem of collecting evidence is assigned to each of the parties. There, after the trial, there is no inquiry or preliminary investigation. But, citizens, as a rule, hire, to defend their interests in a civil court, certified lawyers, and not us ...

 

[@InfoPoisk]

That you correctly say "USUALLY", so we have something to strive for: mrgreen: