Hello everyone! I read all the comments and I’ll say that D. Karpovich from Novosibirsk has the most accurate answer! I was only confused in the explanations from St. Petersburg that there was one who wanted to break through apartment number 5 and it’s not entirely clear why this apartment was and why the ban to go to the address was only for 10 hours. Why didn’t Mr. Budaev conduct an on-site flight analysis with a mandatory poll of an occupant for an apartment? I’ll say about my business that I’ve only successfully completed the search for a “loss” of 15 years today, at the same time, he had a photo of a girl from different angles and very fresh, but in 2.5 days the OMF received at least five false testimonies that they had definitely seen this girl in "this area" - he had lost a lot of time and effort to work out! Dad tried to lead her by the actions of the operas and mine, but I stopped it (the opera unfortunately was young and worked not from information, but for hapok!) I also certainly did not like the statement about "sitting at the same table", etc. I suggest-- made a presentation , then be specific !!! and at least correct !!! From n I wrote from Igor from St. Petersburg that I initially took the initiative from them and they performed ORM under “strict guidance” —that is absolutely categorically impossible: the task is set, the exhaustive information and the customer’s wishes are received, and there SORRY I will work as I can without advisers (especially civilians: we know absolutely EVERYTHING how to treat people and solve crimes!) Summarizing, I’ll say: sort out each other’s points and what you’ve gotten together (I’m holding my head and shoving it away!), (if you want), and the whole skirmish looks very unbecoming! Thank you for your attention! Respect to all, Igor