Kagansky was reminded of the "Attic 100%"
The Investigative Committee of Russia (ICR) received a statement from the co-owner of the Moscow company Globus-V, who accuses Maxim Kagansky, who is in custody, of not paying him for a share in a business cafe in the center of Moscow.
The detainee on charges of extorting a large bribe Maxim Kagansky may become a defendant in another criminal case. The Investigative Committee of Russia (ICR) received a statement from the co-owner of the Moscow company Globus-V, which claims that Kagansky did not pay him for his share in the business - a cafe located in the center of the capital.
The applicant requests the Investigative Committee to give a legal assessment of the actions of Maxim Kagansky and Denis Glukhov, the son of General Ivan Glukhov, head of the Main Investigation Department of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for Moscow.
Judging by his words, Kagansky and Glukhov-ml. in 2009, became his business partners, having acquired shares in LLC Globus-V for his wives - Anastasia Kaganskaya and Olga Glukhova. The third co-owner of the LLC was a certain Maria Demchenko. The company owns the Attic 100% cafe located in building N 19/21 on Rusakovskaya Street.
“In 2008, my partner, with whom I worked before, wanted to get out of business, did not want to develop a restaurant, and I started looking for other partners,” said the applicant who wished not to give his name. “I found several people, including Maxim.”
According to the businessman, Maxim Kagansky and Denis Glukhov helped open new halls, investing tens of thousands of dollars with him in updating and promoting the updated cafe. “The cafe worked well, but a year later, in November 2009, I decided to quit the founders,” he says and admits that he expected to get $ 79,000 in compensation from partners, that is, the amount he invested.
Change of founders
The fact that the entrepreneur really invested money, he is ready to confirm with documents: "I have all the checks." However, he never received the money owed to him.
Moreover, the cafe without its knowledge was reissued to another legal entity, but when in 2011 Maxim Kagansky came into the view of law enforcement agencies, it again began to be listed as Globus-V. “I kind of became a co-founder again, but there wasn’t any money anymore,” the businessman laments. According to him, Kagansky explained the failure to fulfill the agreement with financial difficulties, and Denis Glukhov completely stopped answering his calls.
Meanwhile, Mikhail Borisov, a former police officer in the Eastern District of the capital, became the new CEO of Globus-V LLC.
During the pre-investigation check, which, at the request of the applicant, was initiated by the Main Directorate of Economic Security and Anti-Corruption of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (GUEBiPK), Borisov said that the Attic 100% cafe will continue to operate until May 2012, when the lease term ends.
Then, in its place, it is planned to open a chain restaurant “Baku Yard”. If you believe Tatyana Andreeva, the deputy head of the Sokolniki Administrative Board, the interests of the new rental company through the Moscow Property Department were lobbied by the famous theater director Roman Viktyuk.
New circumstances in the case of the “solver”
Recall that immediately after the detention of Kagansky, the Investigative Committee invited all victims of his actions to contact the investigating authorities.
Maxim Kagansky, who was on the run for several months, was detained on January 17. He is the main person involved in a high-profile investigation into the extortion of $ 3 million from the management of the Medica company for ending the criminal case of smuggling a tomograph.
It was he, according to the investigation, who was negotiating the closure of the case with the investigator of the Moscow Investigation Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (the former Main Directorate of the Central Internal Affairs Directorate of Moscow) Nelly Dmitrieva. According to investigators, he was an intermediary in receiving her a bribe.
Nelly Dmitrieva, while in custody, at first denied her guilt, stating that the decision to put Kagansky allegedly came from the head of the GUEBiPK, General Denis Sugrobov, who had personal accounts for Kagansky. However, it later became clear that this is not so.
The general himself does not comment on attacks on him. But, according to people from his circle, when Kagansky was an operative of the DEB (now the GUEBiPK), Denis Sugrobov did not communicate with him at all. Sugrobov joined the DEB in 2007 as deputy head of department of the 7th operative search bureau. Before that, he saw the future “solver” only once, several years earlier, when he served in the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for the Central Federal District - then the Kagansky operative, who worked there, came to work in a Mercedes car, accompanied by two security guards.
Nelly Dmitrieva not only pleaded guilty to receiving a bribe (part 4 of Article 290 of the Criminal Code, provides for punishment of up to 10 years in prison), but also gave detailed testimony to Kagansky. For this, they changed the preventive measure by releasing from custody.
Dmitrieva confessed under the pressure of irrefutable evidence, among which were materials of wiretaps of conversations of the defendants in the case. Of these, in particular, it became known about the conversation between Nelly Dmitrieva and one of her assistants, which took place in September 2011, the Kommersant newspaper reported. Investigator for particularly important cases, Nelly Dmitrieva, told him that representatives of Medica agreed to Lyam ($ 1 million). Of this amount, 200 thousand dollars should have gone to one of Dmitrieva’s bosses, and the remaining accomplices planned to divide 800 thousand among themselves.
The interlocutor of Dmitrieva doubted that Kagansky would "harness for such a trifle", to which she replied: "We have been scouring them for six months now."
Subsequently, it turned out that Kagansky planned to receive from the co-founder Medica company Boris Yudin, who was afraid of turning from a witness into an accused, another 2 million dollars.
During interrogations in the Investigative Committee of Moscow, Dmitrieva said that when Yudin came to her, she uttered code phrases, which Kagansky had previously spoken with a businessman. So Yudin should have understood that Dmitrieva agreed to a bribe.
According to BFM.ru, most likely, a pre-trial transaction will be concluded with Dmitrieva, which will allow her to count on a milder sentence than provided for by the article of the Criminal Code imputed to her. Then her case will be set aside in a separate proceeding and examined in a special order - without examining all the evidence and interrogating the witnesses. It can "go" to court in early summer.
The verdict of the court may prove the guilt of Maxim Kagansky, who still continues to deny his guilt. He does not testify in the case. For mediation in bribery (part 4 of Article 291.1 of the Criminal Code), he faces 7 to 12 years in prison with a fine in the amount of seventy-fold bribes.
Kagansky’s lawyer Sergei Nikitenko told BFM.ru that “he was again beginning to exert psychological pressure” on his client, who was recently transferred from the 5th detention center to detention center No. 6, where there are cameras for law enforcement officers, at the insistence of the defense. “Kagansky was placed in a special unit where there are more stringent conditions for isolation,” the lawyer said. According to him, there are three more prisoners together with the accused in the cell. “One is a suicide, walks around and says he doesn’t want to live. It’s with the help of such small dirty tricks that they create problems, ”complained Nikitenko.
Meanwhile, as BFM.ru stated, a source close to the investigation, the morale of the Kagansky cellmates is not a violation of the law. “Lawyers repeatedly told the media about the need to transfer their client to another detention center. Now their requirement has been met, but they are again unhappy, ”the portal’s interlocutor said.
[DLMURL="https://www.bfm.ru/articles/2012/04/17/k"] BFM.ru - business news of Russia and the world [/ DLMURL] ... k-100.html