HTTPS for "MOD"

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

Interesting! Incomprehensible !!

: shock:: shock:: shock:

All Interesting and Interesting:!::!::!:

Someone else remembers last year's talk about games
with "semi-private", "private" and other "closed" branches:?:
If you remember, then everything is clear: P
And now it is also confirmed by these dialogs: roll:: oops:

 

[Stels]

Ruslan ... why so angry! ...

And thanks for that. As the saying goes, "fish without fish and cancer"
But I dare to quote part of your post: "... and paying a ton of money so that someone does not confuse our site with another is not reasonable ...".
In my opinion, many will not understand what is at stake, but in this way I will simplistically explain what MitM (Man-in-the-Middle attack (in Russian "man-in-the-middle") is.

This kind of attack involves the participation of three parties: the server (for example, the MOD server), the client (your KTO-TO) and the attacker (for example, special FSB, tax, etc.) located between them. In this situation, an attacker can intercept all messages that follow in both directions, and, if necessary, replace, distort them. The attacker appears to be the server for the client and the client for the server. However, such an attack is not possible when using the SSL protocol, since certificates authenticated by a certification authority are used to authenticate the source (usually the server).

An attack is successful if:
The server does not have a signed certificate.
The client does not verify the server certificate.
The user ignores the message that the certificate is not signed by the certification authority or that the certificate does not match the cached certificate.
Self-signed certificates can be easily replaced and used in man-in-the-middle attacks.

However, the self-signed certificates you created are better than nothing.
Misters detectives pass to HTTPS! Ruslan will explain - it’s simpler and much safer than walking naked on the Internet!

Sorry if I offended you! I will not pull a sponsor to help you (crisis in the country )

Regards, Stels.

 

[Stels]

And what kind of games you had with PRIVATE, if not a secret! Enemies bursting?

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

Thanks for the comment.

 

[Частный детектив. Тайный советник. Омск.]

Ruslan ... why so angry! ...

And thanks for that. As the saying goes, "fish without fish and cancer"
But I dare to quote part of your post: "... and paying a ton of money so that someone does not confuse our site with another is not reasonable ...".
In my opinion, many will not understand what is at stake, but in this way I will simplistically explain what MitM (Man-in-the-Middle attack (in Russian "man-in-the-middle") is.

This kind of attack involves the participation of three parties: the server (for example, the MOD server), the client (your KTO-TO) and the attacker (for example, special FSB, tax, etc.) located between them. In this situation, an attacker can intercept all messages that follow in both directions, and, if necessary, replace, distort them. The attacker appears to be the server for the client and the client for the server. However, such an attack is not possible when using the SSL protocol, since certificates authenticated by a certification authority are used to authenticate the source (usually the server).

An attack is successful if:
The server does not have a signed certificate.
The client does not verify the server certificate.
The user ignores the message that the certificate is not signed by the certification authority or that the certificate does not match the cached certificate.
Self-signed certificates can be easily replaced and used in man-in-the-middle attacks.

However, the self-signed certificates you created are better than nothing.
Misters detectives pass to HTTPS! Ruslan will explain - it’s simpler and much safer than walking naked on the Internet!

Sorry if I offended you! I will not pull a sponsor to help you (crisis in the country )

Regards, Stels.

Here are the explanations !!! It seems to me that they are worthy of our attention. Indeed, this is the safety of our communication.

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

And in my opinion, the BEST INFORMATION PROTECTION is not to "blame" it without looking left and right, but to think before you start talking ..... And what kind of secrets do we have here for the FSB and the tax ??? : lol: ...... though, escalating the hysteria of the universal “cap” was always fashionable and added fog for the ignorant: lol:

 

[Матушкин Андрей Николаевич]

And in my opinion, the BEST INFORMATION PROTECTION is not to "blame" it without looking left and right, but to think before you start talking ..... And what kind of secrets do we have here for the FSB and the tax ??? : lol: ...... though, escalating the hysteria of the universal “cap” was always fashionable and added fog for the ignorant: lol:

Strongly agree!

 

[Stels]

Dear Help or Uri (unfortunately I don’t know yet) quoting your words ... do not “blame” it (information, author's note) without looking left and right, but think before you start communicating ... I agree unequivocally, but however, something has to be "blamed". You are well aware of such a method of cognition as induction i.e. the movement of knowledge from particulars to statements of a general nature. I agree that we don’t have any such secrets here for the FSB (SBU, approx. Author)) and the tax ... (I quote) there is no, but they can have GOALS. Anyway, if everyone .. doesn’t “knock” it left and right, and thinks before they start talking ... why do you need SEMI-PRIVATE and PRIVATE or you look around there too.

 

[Stels]

Here is a general opinion on the topic How to secure your mail ?:

Kuznecov.Igorj wrote:
Andrey Hello! Question. But do we have completely secret information or secret? This is not provided for in the laws, so is it worth it to play counterintelligence? Igor

Oberon wrote:
Worth it. When you send an array of information on an object, it is not known how an outsider can use it. For example, I’m beware. Then you won’t get rid of the charge of fraud.

Detective agency. Corax. Kharkov wrote:
All right, not seeds, all the same, we trade information. But such safety methods are not so complicated and should not be neglected.

A private detective wrote:
Absolutely true colleagues. God saves man, who save himself ..........

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

So no one is against elementary security measures, I talked about something else:
1. You can get secure from unprofessional hackers-hooligans, but no measures will help if the pros take up the matter ...
2. The best security is not to abuse mail (especially important) from one mail or to avoid mail at all ..
3. to bring the opinion that there is a hunt around us and it is being conducted around the clock, which means approaching paranoia or a mania of persecution

And knowledge similar to the fact that you, Stealth, is important, but, I think, inaccessible to most ...