Moskova'nın yankısı

[Группа К]

Lord!
Please comment on my latest blog on the Echo of Moscow forum
[DLMURL] https://www.echo.msk.ru/blog/y644232/925770-echo/ [/ DLMURL]
Thank!
Alexander

 

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

Or put it here?

 

[частный детектив Химки]

In the meantime, the one-day law has not been adopted, I suggest that Rosfinmonitoring, when monitoring dubious transactions, focus on concluding private investigators. I am sure that the risks of default on government contracts will become much less.

: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:
In fact, these are private detectives “in line” at Rosfinmonitoring are: lol :: lol :: lol:
Yes, and not everyone is served

 

[Группа К]

Methodology for Bureaucrats
September 02, 2012, 09:54

Yesterday, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev sharply criticized the progress in the construction of the Zenit Arena stadium in St. Petersburg. The developer explains the current shameful situation with bureaucratic delays.

In my opinion, the developer is right. The whole point is the irresponsibility of the bureaucrats who oversaw the errand of the former President. I mean the results of the meeting of the Anti-Corruption Council on January 13, 2011 at which Dmitry Medvedev criticized the Russian government for delaying the development of a bill relating to the activities of one-day firms.

Today, the one-day law has not been adopted.

To date, private investigators have accumulated tremendous experience in identifying signs of an unreliable business partner or an unscrupulous counterparty (taxpayer). based on pre-verification of more than 100 factors of the financial and economic activities of the audited entity.

For example:

1) If the legal form of the counterparty is “LLC”, then the risk of the transaction is higher than that of a closed joint-stock company, OJSC, or even individual entrepreneur.

2) The risk of non-fulfillment of obligations increases many times if an audit of records in Rosstat has shown that the counterparty does not submit reports to the statistical authorities.

3) If the company of the counterparty is registered less than a year ago, the risk of default on obligations under the contract increases significantly.

By the way, according to the Federal State Statistics Service, by the time the arena began construction (2007), the life cycle of the builder - LLC “Inzhtransstroy-SPb” (TIN 7801456461, registration date 12/17/2007) - did not exceed one (!) Month.

In the meantime, the one-day law has not been adopted, I suggest that Rosfinmonitoring, when monitoring dubious transactions, focus on concluding private investigators. I am sure that the risks of default on government contracts will be much less.

 

[Группа К]

In the meantime, the one-day law has not been adopted, I suggest that Rosfinmonitoring, when monitoring dubious transactions, focus on concluding private investigators. I am sure that the risks of default on government contracts will become much less.

: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:: lol:
In fact, these are private detectives “in line” at Rosfinmonitoring are: lol :: lol :: lol:
Yes, and not everyone is served

I can’t understand your remark, colleague For example, I’m not standing in line at Rosfinmonitoring.

 

[Игорь]

It all depends on the amount of the rollback, on objects of federal significance, as well as personal relationships and the detective will not be allowed there.

 

[Группа К]

I agree. But the method of detective audit does not provide that the owner of the company will allow a detective for a hidden inspection of the object. Only at the stage of preparing the report, the counterparty business reliability index is adjusted depending on the qualification of the detective, i.e. from the detective’s ability to find the information that the counterparty was not interested in showing.

 

[частный детектив Химки]

I can’t understand your remark, colleague

I mean, with its information arrays, capabilities, and administrative resources, Rosfinmonitoring only has what to focus on the conclusion of private detectives

 

[Группа К]

I agree, they have legal facts. But who can argue that guiding or supporting information cannot be used for evidence. And in this case, detectives have no equal. If you build the report correctly and logically, then the information collected by the detective will give odds even to the direct evidence of the investigator.

 

[Роберт]

About one-day construction projects. It is very simple there to bankrupt (in court) building companies allegedly having debts to each other for the supply of building materials, work, etc. So you can even not pay workers wages, referring to the bankruptcy procedure (bankruptcy trustee, etc.) The scam is quite simple to calculate: the same bankruptcy trustee appointed by the court, the same owners (founders, leaders, etc.)
It’s easy to find out: we take the court site for companies and databases for registered legal entities, and then we take the DBG database for the identified names and look at the property by founders and managers: D. We find out a lot of interesting things and rejoice: D from a job well done.