Moskova'nın yankısı

[Группа К]

Thank you, an excellent technique for predicting the business reliability of a future counterparty. It seems to me that this method can be applied not only to the construction industry, but for other activities.

 

[Роберт]

To health.

 

[Детектив-Молдова]

Colleagues, Rosfinmonitoring will need to pay budget money to private investigators, but is there a legislative norm to attract such specialists in its work? To conclude an agreement with the Detective Agency, it is necessary to follow the procedure for making public procurements, to conduct a tender (for services inclusive). To conclude an agreement with a private detective, you also need the norm of the Law. In my opinion this is not real. In my vision, it is necessary to lobby for the relevant changes in the NPV Law, then the budget will provide for the relevant articles to pay for the Black hole operation and all doors will open for us.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

No guys ... Not everything is as simple as it seems at first glance. I am serving several construction companies on our territory. We are currently undergoing tremendous construction at the expense of federal funds. (The city is being completely rebuilt). So, to the construction in fact, only semi-state or only state structures (with 100% state-owned corporation) and only SRO members (sufficiently reliable, from the point of view of our inspections, persons) are always involved as a general contractor. As a subcontractor, the general contractor involves various companies that , of course, attracted not just like that, but for a certain rollback (only if there are personal connections). The work is being carried out, but the general contractor actually does not pay. There are a lot of such cases. The solution to the corruption problem in this way is not to identify with some help not conscientious builders (the so-called one-day firms), whose activities are constantly being discussed, but a little bit friend. The problem is that the money disappears without a trace at the level of the general contractor, which everyone knows, has good assets. However, it is practically impossible to recover money from him for the performance of work, even through the court. Thus, the activity on checking the reliability of partners, especially on the part of the private investigation, is not necessary for the state (or rather, not for the state as such, but for specific officials), because this will prevent these officials from having a good gesheft ...

 

[Роберт]

Well, this method is well known. In Sochi, it seems, the same pattern. To solve this problem, you just need to control the posting of money. If the movement of accounts becomes transparent, then almost no questions will arise.

 

[Евгений СБ]

No guys ... Not everything is as simple as it seems at first glance. I am serving several construction companies on our territory. We are currently undergoing tremendous construction at the expense of federal funds. (The city is being completely rebuilt). So, to the construction in fact, only semi-state or only state structures (with 100% state-owned corporation) and only SRO members (sufficiently reliable, from the point of view of our inspections, persons) are always involved as a general contractor. As a subcontractor, the general contractor involves various companies that , of course, attracted not just like that, but for a certain rollback (only if there are personal connections). The work is being carried out, but the general contractor actually does not pay. There are a lot of such cases. The solution to the corruption problem in this way is not to identify with some help not conscientious builders (the so-called one-day firms), whose activities are constantly being discussed, but a little bit friend. The problem is that the money disappears without a trace at the level of the general contractor, which everyone knows, has good assets. However, it is practically impossible to recover money from him for the performance of work, even through the court. Thus, the activity on checking the reliability of partners, especially on the part of the private investigation, is not necessary for the state (or rather, not for the state as such, but for specific officials), because this will prevent these officials from having a good gesheft ...

Everything is correct Andrey. We have already encountered such a scheme. True, we managed to get money from the contractor, legally and even without litigation. But this work was worth a lot.

 

[Роберт]

No guys ... Not everything is as simple as it seems at first glance. I am serving several construction companies on our territory. We are currently undergoing tremendous construction at the expense of federal funds. (The city is being completely rebuilt). So, to the construction in fact, only semi-state or only state structures (with 100% state-owned corporation) and only SRO members (sufficiently reliable, from the point of view of our inspections, persons) are always involved as a general contractor. As a subcontractor, the general contractor involves various companies that , of course, attracted not just like that, but for a certain rollback (only if there are personal connections). The work is being carried out, but the general contractor actually does not pay. There are a lot of such cases. The solution to the corruption problem in this way is not to identify with some help not conscientious builders (the so-called one-day firms), whose activities are constantly being discussed, but a little bit friend. The problem is that the money disappears without a trace at the level of the general contractor, which everyone knows, has good assets. However, it is practically impossible to recover money from him for the performance of work, even through the court. Thus, the activity on checking the reliability of partners, especially on the part of the private investigation, is not necessary for the state (or rather, not for the state as such, but for specific officials), because this will prevent these officials from having a good gesheft ...

And how is it without a trace? Very interesting!