المباحث الخاصة. كيف لا نخطئ في الاختيار؟

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

The article can be described in just 2 words "DO NOT BELIEVE".
When Denis wrote the article, he was very worried- whether Drone would believe .... ehhh .... didn’t believe .... Denis and all his colleagues are upset- DRON MYSELF did not believe: lol:
The author gives examples without reinforcing them with anything or documents or links to Internet resources. Just PR for the sake of PR.
As Denis dared not reinforce the story of his activities with "links to Internet resources" ??? !!! Is it the Great Drone !!! He MANDATELY backs up all his painstaking efforts to conduct SuperMegaExpertiz with 150% certainty with links to virtFacts !!! : lol:
The author gives an example that they helped some woman, and so what?
The answer to the "smartest" question "so what?" - and then! We know how Denis works with SevHelp without examples, but we don’t have any idea who Drone helped with his verbiage ....
In this example, he says that they were able to surpass a certain "private detective" who allegedly took an advance payment for the work and didn’t do it, and a little lower he writes that they themselves take an advance payment with pleasure. And where is the guarantee that they will sometimes do the work and do it with dignity? What this is expressed is not clear, and the author himself is modestly silent about it. For example, in my work I do not contact the prepaid system at all. ( and rightly so for those so-called "results" would only be 100 rubles. gave, not like an advance payment: lol: ) Made an order, ( in, also do orders !!! - I DO NOT BELIEVE !! : lol: ) received the first result (and you know that the first will be followed by more and more information) then ask for money from the customer, being absolutely sure that the work will be completed to the end. And so this scam turns out, fundraisers ( True !!! Self-Criticism - GREAT MATTER !!! Bravo, Drone! ) But was there such a woman in general, that’s the question! When I am going to omit someone by belittling another, I usually have a document in my hands. For example, the customers of the examination are interested in whether my examination will take place in the courts - I show the verdicts of the courts in which this examination already appears as evidence. I also show a particular court ruling on a (purchased) polygraph examiner, my competitor, in which a judge speaks unflattering about his work. Moreover, he (this polygraph examiner) dumps at the cost of examination. But having these materials in hand, the customer can independently and objectively decide who to contact with the order. ( it’s necessary - you DO NOT understand yourself — what you wrote !!! - or did you, Dron, understand ??? : lol: ) In this case, even assuming that such a woman was in fact, a private detective is bound by a non-disclosure agreement about client information, so he simply can’t give this example!
Oh-pa !!! .... as we grow !!! Drone teaches how to work !!! : lol:

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

... يعطي المؤلف أمثلة دون دعمها بأي مستندات أو روابط لمصادر الإنترنت ...

أندري (طائرة بدون طيار) ، كيف تتخيل التعزيزات الوثائقية إذا كانت 99.99٪
الخدمات سرية ... والعملاء "لن يكونوا سعداء" بمثل هذه "الإعلانات".

... الذين أخذوا دفعة مقدمة للعمل ولم يكملوه ، وأقل قليلاً كتب بنفسه أنهم سعداء بأخذ دفعة مقدمة. وأين هو الضمان بأنهم سيؤدون العمل أحيانًا ويقومون به بكرامة؟

هذا المنتدى هو الضمان ، إذا لم تكن قد اكتشفته بعد ...
لا أريد التعليق أكثر:

هل تريد ان تعلمنا كيف نعمل ؟؟؟؟ :؟ :صدمة:
هل يمكننا أن نفعل الشيء الخاص بنا بهدوء؟ ؛)
سيكون الجميع أكثر هدوءًا ، صدقوني ...: لفة:

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

Can everyone quietly do their own thing ??

exactly !!!! .... drone! bake your pies and don’t litter it! ...... As long as there is no Matushkin, I will express myself .....

 

[Евгений СБ]

I agree with Alexander, Igor and Roman. At +100.
Igor And the novel is still +100, for having made a detailed analysis of the statements of the dron.
The comrade clearly does not understand what he is talking about. And why only left your page?

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

I agree with Alexander, Igor and Roman. At +100.
Igor And the novel is still +100, for having made a detailed analysis of the statements of the dron.
The comrade clearly does not understand what he is talking about. And why only left your page?

.... and so no matter where to spoil ...... if only it was unpunished .... sit yourself at the monitor and "grunt" - it is absolutely safe ....

 

[Анатолий Маланченко]

After the Help experiment with Drone, which failed miserably, I made up my mind about this "specialist".

 

[частный детектив Хмельницкий]

After the Help experiment with Drone, which failed miserably, I made up my mind about this "specialist".

ABOUT! Tolya! Hello! .... I must confess, you are one of those who said that you were not with us THERE (in the Crimean mountains) ..... I hope this situation will someday be corrected

 

[dron]

Why are you so boiling? Are you scattering emotions again? Is this page can be viewed only by private detectives and only? If yes, then I take my words back. In your narrow circle, you can praise yourself even until you turn blue. If not, then I claim that the article was written for PR. Because to the reader, far from the specifics of detective activity, the detective is all too early bound by his obligations to the client or not. If he (the detective) is no longer connected, for example, in cases where the client decided to write a letter of thanks or a reference to the detective, but doesn’t this happen, can the detective be praised for a good job? Then, the detective has the right to write about the client (without mentioning or with the name of the full name) or in cases of death of the client or in cases where the court verdict has entered into force, he can describe his heroic exploits. Is not it so? In the meantime, there are no such documents, it is better to be silent in a rag, well, or to PR as the author did by his misunderstanding without mentioning specific facts. But from the outside it looks like a shake of the air!

 

[Детективное агентство Симферополь]

: lol :: lol :: lol :: P

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

... that the article was written for PR.

It should be noted that any article is written for the sake of PR ...
By the way - you participate in the discussion for the same reason: P

... Because the reader, far from the specifics of detective work, is all too early for the detective to be bound by his obligations to the client or not.

Any reader of these pages is a potential client !!!
I would like to see a potential client who "doesn't care"
Detective confidentiality:? : shock:
Maybe you colleague there are specific examples of "vseravno" tuned customers ?? :? : roll:

... If he (the detective) is no longer connected, for example, in cases where the client decided to write a letter of thanks or a reference to the detective, but doesn’t this happen, can the detective be praised for a good job? Then, the detective has the right to write about the client (without mentioning or with the name of the full name) or in cases of death of the client or in cases where the court verdict has entered into force, he can describe his heroic exploits. Is not it so?

In all that you describe colleague cases usually there is the SECOND side, or, at worst, relatives:!:
Does your computer not take these variables into account? : roll:: oops:

In the meantime, there are no such documents, better to be silent in a rag , well, or PR as the author did by his misunderstanding without mentioning specific facts. But from the outside it looks like a shake of the air!

But this is a very practical advice. !!!
And we have repeatedly talked about this topic !!!
Do not know the realities - do not go into the subject:!::!::!:

By the way, in the topic with polygraphs, I (for the same reason) did not go very well: oops :: roll:
What I wish you colleague :!::!::!:
respectfully