Detective agency. DASC. Ukraine, Russia.
Perhaps you are right in terms of NPV, issues related to the professional activities of detectives are really discussed here.
And in general, I was somewhat surprised that basically the questions for us were not related to the professional point of view of the Black Sea Region, there were no questions about the specifics of investigations into cases involving prosecution of dog hunters, nor were there any recommendations for counteraction.
It is difficult to comment on the commercial benefits of BH from counteracting dog hunters, BH practically do not deal with this problem, in most cases, victims go either to law enforcement agencies, where there are cases of neglect and professionalism, or to animal welfare defenders, who often themselves need protection or are not involved declared activity.
As a result, the victim violates the law, either by himself or by contacting criminal structures of various levels, who are ready to help with the problem in money.
In fact - the majority of people simply don’t realize that they will turn to the black hole.
At the expense of personal affairs and popularization, there are facts of illegal actions containing all the signs of a crime, of course, and the public resonance in the circle of such cases is great.
"then I am categorically opposed to PR at the expense of us!" speculation, this statement, is equivalent if I declare that I am promoting this site by posting an urgent problem on it, which has a consistently high rating among animal welfare advocates and dog hunters, and judging by the letters, the latter are very excited about the participation of BH in the suppression of their activities.
I will not try to argue our presence here anymore, since it was originally planned that we would ask questions in the hope of receiving a qualified professional response, and possibly participating in investigative actions and / or preparing materials for a civil lawsuit.
Well, what decision will be made, this will be.
Original message
