The right to testify in the mother tongue

[Андрей Захаров]

Here, the question is not in “giving testimonies” in the native language, but in the execution of the protocol of the interrogation, which according to anyone will be executed in the official language of the state ... in our case, in Russian ... Based on the translation made by the translator ... If that that does not suit you in this matter, look at the procedure for appealing against the actions of judges in criminal proceedings (CCP) and appeal ....

 

[Ермаков Константин]

Here is a different situation. The defendant was from the category of "fearless" and flooded like a bull on the gate. To my surprise, the tactic works. The court faltered twice; the case was already followed up; a number of episodes are already excluded. He behaves in such a way that he has nothing to lose. Paradoxically. But this position works. Some of the victims are already refusing claims. And criminal cases have been filed for the other part

 

[Ермаков Константин]

So the protocol refused to issue. Here is the nonsense

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Regarding "tactics work," it will be seen when the sentence is pronounced .... sometimes it happens for several episodes, the term is short ... and sometimes for one- "on the crown" ....)))) the main thing here is not to overdo it. ...

 

[Ермаков Константин]

Regarding "tactics work," it will be seen when the sentence is pronounced .... sometimes it happens for several episodes, the term is short ... and sometimes for one- "on the crown" ....)))) the main thing here is not to overdo it. ...

 

[Ермаков Константин]

I try to keep the situation under control. In principle, it succeeds.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

I recommend that you read the Resolution of the Plenum of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation on the consideration of cases in the court of first instance, adopted the other day ...
[DLMURL="https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/plenum-vs-rf-razyasnil-rassmotrenie-ugolovnykh-del-v-sude-pervoy-instantsii/"] The Plenum of the RF Supreme Court clarified the consideration of criminal cases in court first instance [/ DLMURL]

 

[Ермаков Константин]

Greetings. Thank. Read. I did not see a particularly terrible repressive one. It is a pity about the translator that they did not state anything at all and about the right to testify in their native language.

 

[Андрей Захаров]

Greetings. Thank. Read. I did not see a particularly terrible repressive one. It is a pity about the translator that they did not state anything at all and about the right to testify in their native language.

There, in the order of making comments on the minutes of the court session .... What is needed if the court does not record something in the minutes ... this is important ... Better yet, contact a lawyer in person ... He’s all correctly explain (in person, and not by correspondence)))) ... And this forum is not a forum of lawyers ... but the Black Sea Forum ...)))) And this question (for testifying in the native language) is a question criminal proceedings ... a question for a specialist in this particular branch of law ...

 

[Ермаков Константин]

Courts are currently recording court hearings. If necessary, you can listen to it and compare it with the protocol. But in the whole you are right. Protocols are riveting ugly.