Violence in family

[Anonymous]

Reason for systemic “democratic” impunity

 

[Частный детектив. Владивосток.]

Andrei, they stole even before 1985, it just might not have gone on the air ... Remember - the "cotton" case, all the republics of the USSR, and across Russia itself - the guilds, etc. Some detective read our name and I don’t remember the author, it was written on the basis of real events about Uzbekistan, I remembered that one of the cotton mafiosi, officially passing as the chairman of the collective farm, had a house in the village. The house has an elevator, he drove into the elevator directly by car, went up to the second floor ...
After 1985, all this just popped out and began to pry openly, volumes, I agree, increased hundreds or thousands of times ... Here, yes, I agree ...

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

Yes, colleagues - nostalgia is a "heavy twig" .
Do not be sad - life goes on. And it’s not such a damned thing: D.

 

[Улисс ГК Скарамуш]

What does the situation have to do with it?
The question of violence and methods of work in this case, and the situation is already a consequence of the actions taken by the person (violent actions).
How to work, for whom to work, with whom to work, in what part to work? These are the questions that arise. Or, like the justices of the peace, we have toothlessness and work only on reconciliation; as investigators, not a desire to work because of the gravity of the evidence.
Who can guarantee that after reconciliation or refusal to initiate criminal proceedings, the villain will not repeat his actions again and again, referring to permissiveness, since he will have motivation: THE LAW IS NOT VIOLATED - MEAN MY ACTIONS ARE ALLOWED.
Someone wondered how many people can suffer because of one scum, how many old people do not live to the end of the allotted years, how many children suffer, and when they grow up, they begin to correspond with the actions of the parent.
Without preventing these actions, we ourselves “build” our relationship in the future.
I understand that this topic is either not read, or do not know it if they read. But the worst thing is if they are silent having any experience, and it doesn’t matter if they are positive or negative. Any experience is valuable, one teaches how to do it right, the other teaches what not to do. : evil:: twisted::?:

Amazingly amateurish approach to the situation.

Have you ever thought, for example, that the socio-economic conditions of society, coupled with the prevailing practice of direct discrimination of men by gender, forces many of them to become “scum”?

 

[Симферополь]

What does the situation have to do with it?
The question of violence and methods of work in this case, and the situation is already a consequence of the actions taken by the person (violent actions).
How to work, for whom to work, with whom to work, in what part to work? These are the questions that arise. Or, like the justices of the peace, we have toothlessness and work only on reconciliation; as investigators, not a desire to work because of the gravity of the evidence.
Who can guarantee that after reconciliation or refusal to initiate criminal proceedings, the villain will not repeat his actions again and again, referring to permissiveness, since he will have motivation: THE LAW IS NOT VIOLATED - MEAN MY ACTIONS ARE ALLOWED.
Someone wondered how many people can suffer because of one scum, how many old people do not live to the end of the allotted years, how many children suffer, and when they grow up, they begin to correspond with the actions of the parent.
Without preventing these actions, we ourselves “build” our relationship in the future.
I understand that this topic is either not read, or do not know it if they read. But the worst thing is if they are silent having any experience, and it doesn’t matter if they are positive or negative. Any experience is valuable, one teaches how to do it right, the other teaches what not to do. : evil:: twisted::?:

Amazingly amateurish approach to the situation.

Have you ever thought, for example, that the socio-economic conditions of society, coupled with the prevailing practice of direct discrimination of men by gender, forces many of them to become “scum”?

A man is getting smaller ... He is looking for excuses for his baseness in "socio-economic conditions and discrimination of men by gender"! Got it. Full insanity !!!
Type: "Yes, I became a bastard, but life made me. She is SO HEAVY !!"
In this place there is also not enough to cry “like a man” for persuasiveness.
You will go far, "colleague", promoting your beliefs-complexes.

Argus, hello! Old man, I share your point of view normal person and professional!

 

[Детективное агентство ИКС-Инфо.]

... direct discrimination of men by gender - Forcing many of them to become "scum"?

: shock:: shock:: shock:: shock:
Um ... um ... um ... No words ... some interjections:?
If it’s not a secret, dear, where is it that you were so “discriminated against”:?::?::?

Judging by some hysterical shades in "speeches",
You have to organize an analogue of the Femen movement ...

 

[Улисс ГК Скарамуш]

What does the situation have to do with it?
The question of violence and methods of work in this case, and the situation is already a consequence of the actions taken by the person (violent actions).
How to work, for whom to work, with whom to work, in what part to work? These are the questions that arise. Or, like the justices of the peace, we have toothlessness and work only on reconciliation; as investigators, not a desire to work because of the gravity of the evidence.
Who can guarantee that after reconciliation or refusal to initiate criminal proceedings, the villain will not repeat his actions again and again, referring to permissiveness, since he will have motivation: THE LAW IS NOT VIOLATED - MEAN MY ACTIONS ARE ALLOWED.
Someone wondered how many people can suffer because of one scum, how many old people do not live to the end of the allotted years, how many children suffer, and when they grow up, they begin to correspond with the actions of the parent.
Without preventing these actions, we ourselves “build” our relationship in the future.
I understand that this topic is either not read, or do not know it if they read. But the worst thing is if they are silent having any experience, and it doesn’t matter if they are positive or negative. Any experience is valuable, one teaches how to do it right, the other teaches what not to do. : evil:: twisted::?:

Amazingly amateurish approach to the situation.

Have you ever thought, for example, that the socio-economic conditions of society, coupled with the prevailing practice of direct discrimination of men by gender, forces many of them to become “scum”?

A man is getting smaller ... He is looking for excuses for his baseness in "socio-economic conditions and discrimination of men by gender"! Got it. Full insanity !!!
Type: "Yes, I became a bastard, but life made me. She is SO HEAVY !!"
In this place there is also not enough to cry “like a man” for persuasiveness.
You will go far, "colleague", promoting your beliefs-complexes.

Argus, hello! Old man, I share your point of view normal person and professional!

I said that the herds of silly Alenas are fat and plentiful.

By the way, the word "man" for a self-respecting man is an insult. According to the primary meaning, “Man” is a male slave, a slave.
And beliefs - complexes you should look for yourself in person. You obviously have enough of them. Well, unless of course you are not indifferent to the interests of your kind, your children, for example.

 

[Улисс ГК Скарамуш]

... direct discrimination of men by gender - Forcing many of them to become "scum"?

: shock:: shock:: shock:: shock:
Um ... um ... um ... No words ... some interjections:?
If it’s not a secret, dear, where is it that you were so “discriminated against”:?::?::?

Judging by some hysterical shades in "speeches",
You have to organize an analogue of the Femen movement ...

It has long been organized.
The male movement protects the rights of men who are seriously discriminated against by society.

You give a detailed argument? Just this conversation is not for one hour.

By the way, where did you see “hysterical shades” in my speeches. Deign to show.

 

[@InfoPoisk]

Argus, hello! Old man, I share your point of view normal person and professional!

Thank you brother.
Only the weak seek excuses not in themselves.

 

[Улисс ГК Скарамуш]

Argus, hello! Old man, I share your point of view normal person and professional!

Thank you brother.
Only the weak seek excuses not in themselves.

Only Deer considers himself guilty for the actions of another person. A man does not provide other people's decisions.