Re: "State Counselor" Autonomous Republic of Crimea-Ukraine, Moscow-Russia
Частный детектив CБ said:
I think that it is not worth voicing your opinions on punishment. So as not to influence in any way the decision of the Arbitrators. Except for the moment if they themselves do not want to hear the opinion of colleagues.
Eugene and no one asked to voice his opinion on PUNISHMENT.
What time? Again: it’s worth it, it’s not worth it, I’m like everything, no matter what happens, etc ........ And then when everything is resolved, unsubscribe: “I agree with the opinion of colleagues”, “I support”, “I agree "- ENOUGH either YES or NO. "On the floor of Fedor" in this situation does not roll.
The kid REALLY LIVES HIS FAMILY and FORUM (thanks to Denis, the forum was NOT an overseas forum in due time), and the ROD was CORRECT !!! Let the drunk, let the swindler, punish us to blame - but he is OUR !!! And who is lary ???
You don’t recognize Eugene lary as a PROVOCATOR, but you say that he behaves in the forum sometimes defiantly, when in fact he is a real PROVOCATOR, this is not only my opinion, but also Matushkina Andrey. I am sure that now you recognize lary as a PROVOCATOR. Have you talked with Matushkin about Denis? sure that NO. But I know that many harnessed for Denis, and I personally with Matushkin. I talked about this issue. Decide who is Denis for you, and who is lary, otherwise it’s somehow dumb: as long as you communicate with a person, everything is fine, but as a person, LOSE so quickly ...
It is necessary to fight for FRIENDS, and if the FRIEND is guilty, he will answer.